YOR 11 Jul 11:00 pm DUR

Lineup Out

Headingley
English T20 Blast

Best Player Combinations For
YOR vs DUR

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best YOR Player Combinations

Best YOR Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

No data found

Best DUR Player Combinations

Best DUR Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

No data found

Best YOR Player Combinations

Best YOR Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

No data found

Best DUR Player Combinations

Best DUR Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
A Turner BAT DUR
B Dwarshuis BOW DUR
B de Leede AR DUR
M Jones BAT DUR
O George-Robinson WK DUR
N Sowter BOW DUR
A Lees BAT DUR
B Raine AR DUR
G Clark BAT DUR
C Parkinson BOW DUR
C Ackermann AR DUR
A Turner
B Dwarshuis
B de Leede
M Jones
O George-Robinson
N Sowter
A Lees
B Raine
G Clark
C Parkinson
C Ackermann
1
1 player
A Turner
2 player
A Turner
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Turner
2 player
B Dwarshuis
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
A Turner
2 player
B de Leede
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.06
1 player
A Turner
2 player
M Jones
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
A Turner
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
A Turner
2 player
N Sowter
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
A Turner
2 player
A Lees
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
A Turner
2 player
B Raine
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Turner
2 player
G Clark
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
A Turner
2 player
C Parkinson
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Turner
2 player
C Ackermann
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
B de Leede
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
M Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
N Sowter
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
A Lees
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
B Raine
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
G Clark
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
C Parkinson
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Dwarshuis
2 player
C Ackermann
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
B de Leede
2 player
A Turner
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B de Leede
2 player
B Dwarshuis
No Correlation
1
1 player
B de Leede
2 player
B de Leede
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
B de Leede
2 player
M Jones
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
B de Leede
2 player
O George-Robinson
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B de Leede
2 player
N Sowter
No Correlation
-0.53
1 player
B de Leede
2 player
A Lees
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
B de Leede
2 player
B Raine
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
B de Leede
2 player
G Clark
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
B de Leede
2 player
C Parkinson
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
B de Leede
2 player
C Ackermann
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
M Jones
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
M Jones
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
M Jones
2 player
B de Leede
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Jones
2 player
M Jones
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
M Jones
2 player
O George-Robinson
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Jones
2 player
N Sowter
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Jones
2 player
A Lees
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
M Jones
2 player
B Raine
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
M Jones
2 player
G Clark
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Jones
2 player
C Parkinson
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Jones
2 player
C Ackermann
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
A Turner
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
B de Leede
Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
M Jones
No Correlation
1
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
O George-Robinson
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
N Sowter
No Correlation
-0.24
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
A Lees
Weak Negative Correlation
0.21
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
B Raine
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
G Clark
Weak Negative Correlation
0.24
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
C Parkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
O George-Robinson
2 player
C Ackermann
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
B de Leede
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
M Jones
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
O George-Robinson
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
N Sowter
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
A Lees
No Correlation
0
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
B Raine
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
G Clark
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
C Parkinson
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
N Sowter
2 player
C Ackermann
Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
A Lees
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Lees
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Negative Correlation
-0.53
1 player
A Lees
2 player
B de Leede
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Lees
2 player
M Jones
No Correlation
-0.24
1 player
A Lees
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.1
1 player
A Lees
2 player
N Sowter
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Lees
2 player
A Lees
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.31
1 player
A Lees
2 player
B Raine
Weak Negative Correlation
0.36
1 player
A Lees
2 player
G Clark
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
A Lees
2 player
C Parkinson
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Lees
2 player
C Ackermann
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
B Raine
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
B Raine
2 player
B Dwarshuis
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Raine
2 player
B de Leede
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
B Raine
2 player
M Jones
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
B Raine
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Raine
2 player
N Sowter
No Correlation
-0.31
1 player
B Raine
2 player
A Lees
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
B Raine
2 player
B Raine
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
B Raine
2 player
G Clark
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
B Raine
2 player
C Parkinson
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
B Raine
2 player
C Ackermann
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Clark
2 player
A Turner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
G Clark
2 player
B Dwarshuis
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
G Clark
2 player
B de Leede
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
G Clark
2 player
M Jones
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
G Clark
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.17
1 player
G Clark
2 player
N Sowter
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
G Clark
2 player
A Lees
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
G Clark
2 player
B Raine
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
G Clark
2 player
G Clark
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.37
1 player
G Clark
2 player
C Parkinson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
G Clark
2 player
C Ackermann
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
A Turner
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
B Dwarshuis
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
B de Leede
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
M Jones
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
N Sowter
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
A Lees
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
B Raine
No Correlation
-0.37
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
G Clark
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
C Parkinson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Parkinson
2 player
C Ackermann
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
A Turner
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
B Dwarshuis
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
B de Leede
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
M Jones
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
O George-Robinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
N Sowter
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
A Lees
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
B Raine
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
G Clark
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
C Parkinson
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Ackermann
2 player
C Ackermann
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick B de Leede and O George-Robinson together
Positive Correlation

No data found

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved