Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
SYS 14 Nov 10:00 am BRS

Lineup Out

North Sydney Oval
Australian Womens T20 League

Best Player Combinations For
SYS vs BRS

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

SYS vs BRS

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best SYS Player Combinations

Best SYS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
S Ecclestone BOW SYS
C Bray BOW SYS
M Brown AR SYS
C Sippel BOW SYS
H Armitage BAT SYS
S Bryce WK SYS
A Kerr AR SYS
L Cheatle BOW SYS
E Perry AR SYS
A Gardner AR SYS
A Healy WK SYS
S Ecclestone
C Bray
M Brown
C Sippel
H Armitage
S Bryce
A Kerr
L Cheatle
E Perry
A Gardner
A Healy
1
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
S Ecclestone
Strong Positive Correlation
0.58
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
C Bray
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
M Brown
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
C Sippel
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
S Bryce
No Correlation
0.9
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
A Kerr
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
L Cheatle
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
E Perry
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
A Gardner
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
A Healy
No Correlation
0.58
1 player
C Bray
2 player
S Ecclestone
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Bray
2 player
C Bray
Strong Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
C Bray
2 player
M Brown
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Bray
2 player
C Sippel
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
C Bray
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Bray
2 player
S Bryce
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Bray
2 player
A Kerr
Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
C Bray
2 player
L Cheatle
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
C Bray
2 player
E Perry
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Bray
2 player
A Gardner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Bray
2 player
A Healy
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
M Brown
2 player
S Ecclestone
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
M Brown
2 player
C Bray
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Brown
2 player
M Brown
Strong Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
M Brown
2 player
C Sippel
Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
M Brown
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
M Brown
2 player
S Bryce
Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
M Brown
2 player
A Kerr
Weak Negative Correlation
0.28
1 player
M Brown
2 player
L Cheatle
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
M Brown
2 player
E Perry
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
M Brown
2 player
A Gardner
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
M Brown
2 player
A Healy
Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
S Ecclestone
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
C Bray
Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
M Brown
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
C Sippel
Strong Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
H Armitage
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
S Bryce
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
A Kerr
Negative Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
L Cheatle
Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
E Perry
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
A Gardner
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
A Healy
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
S Ecclestone
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
C Bray
Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
M Brown
Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
C Sippel
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
H Armitage
Strong Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
S Bryce
Positive Correlation
-0.55
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
A Kerr
Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
L Cheatle
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E Perry
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
A Gardner
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
A Healy
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
S Ecclestone
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
C Bray
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
M Brown
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
C Sippel
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
S Bryce
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
A Kerr
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
L Cheatle
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
E Perry
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
A Gardner
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
A Healy
Positive Correlation
0.9
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
S Ecclestone
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
C Bray
Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
M Brown
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
C Sippel
Negative Correlation
-0.55
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
H Armitage
Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
S Bryce
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
A Kerr
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
L Cheatle
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
E Perry
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
A Gardner
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
A Healy
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
S Ecclestone
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
C Bray
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
M Brown
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
C Sippel
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
S Bryce
Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
A Kerr
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
L Cheatle
Strong Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
E Perry
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
A Gardner
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
A Healy
Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
E Perry
2 player
S Ecclestone
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
E Perry
2 player
C Bray
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
E Perry
2 player
M Brown
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
E Perry
2 player
C Sippel
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
E Perry
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
E Perry
2 player
S Bryce
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
E Perry
2 player
A Kerr
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
E Perry
2 player
L Cheatle
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Perry
2 player
E Perry
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
E Perry
2 player
A Gardner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
E Perry
2 player
A Healy
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
S Ecclestone
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
C Bray
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
M Brown
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
C Sippel
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
S Bryce
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
A Kerr
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
L Cheatle
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
E Perry
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
A Gardner
Strong Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
A Healy
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Healy
2 player
S Ecclestone
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Healy
2 player
C Bray
Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
A Healy
2 player
M Brown
Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
A Healy
2 player
C Sippel
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
A Healy
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Healy
2 player
S Bryce
Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
A Healy
2 player
A Kerr
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Healy
2 player
L Cheatle
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
A Healy
2 player
E Perry
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
A Healy
2 player
A Gardner
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Healy
2 player
A Healy
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick S Ecclestone and A Kerr together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick M Brown and H Armitage together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Brown and S Bryce together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Sippel and H Armitage together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick C Sippel and A Healy together
Positive Correlation

Pick H Armitage and A Healy together
Positive Correlation

Pick S Bryce and A Healy together
Positive Correlation

Don’t Pick C Sippel and A Kerr together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 E Perry

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Cheatle 0.36
A Gardner 0.34
S Ecclestone 0.31
A Kerr 0.22
C Bray 0.13
S Bryce 0.12
A Healy 0.1
M Brown 0.04
C Sippel 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
H Armitage -0.02

2 A Gardner

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Cheatle 0.45
E Perry 0.34
C Bray 0.28
A Kerr 0.28
A Healy 0.24
M Brown 0.17
S Ecclestone 0.15
C Sippel 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
H Armitage -0.05
S Bryce -0.05

3 L Cheatle

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C Bray 0.52
A Healy 0.5
A Gardner 0.45
C Sippel 0.4
S Bryce 0.4
E Perry 0.36
M Brown 0.28
S Ecclestone 0.2
H Armitage 0.18
Opposite Perfomance
A Kerr -0.07

4 S Ecclestone

BOW
Similar Perfomance
A Kerr 0.9
C Bray 0.58
E Perry 0.31
H Armitage 0.23
L Cheatle 0.2
A Gardner 0.15
M Brown 0.1
C Sippel 0.01

5 M Brown

AR
Similar Perfomance
H Armitage 0.62
S Bryce 0.6
C Sippel 0.51
A Healy 0.45
C Bray 0.36
L Cheatle 0.28
A Gardner 0.17
S Ecclestone 0.1
E Perry 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
A Kerr -0.27

Best BRS Player Combinations

Best BRS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
N de Klerk AR BRS
L Hamilton BOW BRS
G Redmayne WK BRS
N Hancock BOW BRS
G Harris BAT BRS
C Knott AR BRS
L Harris BAT BRS
J Jonassen AR BRS
G Parsons BOW BRS
S Pandey BOW BRS
J Rodrigues BAT BRS
N de Klerk
L Hamilton
G Redmayne
N Hancock
G Harris
C Knott
L Harris
J Jonassen
G Parsons
S Pandey
J Rodrigues
1
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
N de Klerk
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
L Hamilton
Negative Correlation
0.07
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
N Hancock
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
G Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
L Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Negative Correlation
0.05
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
G Parsons
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
S Pandey
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
J Rodrigues
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
N de Klerk
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
L Hamilton
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
G Harris
Negative Correlation
0.56
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
C Knott
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
L Harris
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
G Parsons
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
S Pandey
Weak Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
J Rodrigues
Strong Negative Correlation
0.07
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
N de Klerk
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
G Redmayne
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
N Hancock
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
G Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
L Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.66
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
G Parsons
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
S Pandey
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
J Rodrigues
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
N de Klerk
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
N Hancock
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
G Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
L Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
J Jonassen
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
G Parsons
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
S Pandey
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
J Rodrigues
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
G Harris
2 player
N de Klerk
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
G Harris
2 player
L Hamilton
Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Harris
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
G Harris
2 player
N Hancock
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Harris
2 player
G Harris
Strong Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
G Harris
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
G Harris
2 player
L Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
G Harris
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.3
1 player
G Harris
2 player
G Parsons
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Harris
2 player
S Pandey
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
G Harris
2 player
J Rodrigues
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
C Knott
2 player
N de Klerk
No Correlation
0.56
1 player
C Knott
2 player
L Hamilton
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
C Knott
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
C Knott
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
C Knott
2 player
G Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Knott
2 player
C Knott
Strong Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
C Knott
2 player
L Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
C Knott
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
C Knott
2 player
G Parsons
No Correlation
0.57
1 player
C Knott
2 player
S Pandey
Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
C Knott
2 player
J Rodrigues
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
L Harris
2 player
N de Klerk
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Harris
2 player
L Hamilton
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
L Harris
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
L Harris
2 player
N Hancock
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
L Harris
2 player
G Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
L Harris
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Harris
2 player
L Harris
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
L Harris
2 player
J Jonassen
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
L Harris
2 player
G Parsons
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
L Harris
2 player
S Pandey
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
L Harris
2 player
J Rodrigues
No Correlation
-0.28
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
N de Klerk
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
L Hamilton
Weak Negative Correlation
0.26
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
G Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
J Jonassen
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
G Parsons
No Correlation
0.75
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
S Pandey
Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
J Rodrigues
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
N de Klerk
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
L Hamilton
Strong Positive Correlation
0.66
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
G Redmayne
Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
G Harris
Weak Negative Correlation
0.04
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
L Harris
Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
J Jonassen
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
G Parsons
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
S Pandey
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
J Rodrigues
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
N de Klerk
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
L Hamilton
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
G Redmayne
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
N Hancock
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
G Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
C Knott
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
0.75
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
J Jonassen
Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
G Parsons
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
S Pandey
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
J Rodrigues
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
N de Klerk
Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
L Hamilton
Strong Negative Correlation
0.1
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
N Hancock
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
G Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
J Jonassen
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
G Parsons
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
S Pandey
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
J Rodrigues
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick L Hamilton and L Harris together
Positive Correlation

Pick L Hamilton and G Parsons together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick G Redmayne and G Parsons together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Jonassen and S Pandey together
Positive Correlation

Don’t pick N de Klerk and L Hamilton in the same lineup
Negative Correlation

Don’t pick L Hamilton and J Rodrigues in the same lineup
Strong Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 J Jonassen

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Pandey 0.75
G Harris 0.32
G Redmayne 0.26
C Knott 0.26
N Hancock 0.18
L Harris 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
L Hamilton -0.33
N de Klerk -0.28
J Rodrigues -0.08
G Parsons -0.03

2 C Knott

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Pandey 0.57
L Hamilton 0.56
L Harris 0.36
G Redmayne 0.3
J Jonassen 0.26
G Harris 0.21
N Hancock 0.17
N de Klerk 0.13
G Parsons 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
J Rodrigues -0.07

3 N Hancock

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Pandey 0.47
G Harris 0.34
G Redmayne 0.33
L Harris 0.32
N de Klerk 0.25
J Jonassen 0.18
C Knott 0.17
Opposite Perfomance
J Rodrigues -0.35
L Hamilton -0.1
G Parsons -0.09

4 G Harris

BAT
Similar Perfomance
N de Klerk 0.35
J Rodrigues 0.35
N Hancock 0.34
S Pandey 0.33
J Jonassen 0.32
C Knott 0.21
L Harris 0.21
G Redmayne 0.2
Opposite Perfomance
L Hamilton -0.42
G Parsons -0.3

5 G Redmayne

WK
Similar Perfomance
G Parsons 0.66
S Pandey 0.42
L Harris 0.36
N Hancock 0.33
C Knott 0.3
J Jonassen 0.26
G Harris 0.2
J Rodrigues 0.1
N de Klerk 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
L Hamilton -0.17

Best SYS Player Combinations

Best SYS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
S Ecclestone BOW SYS
C Bray BOW SYS
M Brown AR SYS
C Sippel BOW SYS
H Armitage BAT SYS
S Bryce WK SYS
A Kerr AR SYS
L Cheatle BOW SYS
E Perry AR SYS
A Gardner AR SYS
A Healy WK SYS
S Ecclestone
C Bray
M Brown
C Sippel
H Armitage
S Bryce
A Kerr
L Cheatle
E Perry
A Gardner
A Healy
1
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
S Ecclestone
Strong Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
C Bray
Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
M Brown
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
C Sippel
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
S Bryce
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
A Kerr
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
L Cheatle
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
E Perry
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
A Gardner
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
S Ecclestone
2 player
A Healy
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
C Bray
2 player
S Ecclestone
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Bray
2 player
C Bray
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Bray
2 player
M Brown
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
C Bray
2 player
C Sippel
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Bray
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
C Bray
2 player
S Bryce
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Bray
2 player
A Kerr
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Bray
2 player
L Cheatle
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
C Bray
2 player
E Perry
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
C Bray
2 player
A Gardner
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Bray
2 player
A Healy
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
M Brown
2 player
S Ecclestone
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Brown
2 player
C Bray
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Brown
2 player
M Brown
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Brown
2 player
C Sippel
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Brown
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Brown
2 player
S Bryce
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Brown
2 player
A Kerr
Negative Correlation
-0.05
1 player
M Brown
2 player
L Cheatle
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
M Brown
2 player
E Perry
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
M Brown
2 player
A Gardner
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Brown
2 player
A Healy
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
S Ecclestone
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
C Bray
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
M Brown
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
C Sippel
Strong Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
S Bryce
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
A Kerr
Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
L Cheatle
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
E Perry
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
A Gardner
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
A Healy
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
S Ecclestone
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
C Bray
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
M Brown
Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
C Sippel
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
H Armitage
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
S Bryce
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
A Kerr
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
L Cheatle
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E Perry
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
A Gardner
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
A Healy
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
S Ecclestone
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
C Bray
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
M Brown
Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
C Sippel
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
S Bryce
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
A Kerr
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
L Cheatle
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
E Perry
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
A Gardner
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Bryce
2 player
A Healy
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
S Ecclestone
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
C Bray
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
M Brown
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
C Sippel
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
H Armitage
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
S Bryce
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
A Kerr
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
L Cheatle
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
E Perry
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
A Gardner
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Kerr
2 player
A Healy
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
S Ecclestone
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
C Bray
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
M Brown
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
C Sippel
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
S Bryce
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
A Kerr
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
L Cheatle
Strong Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
E Perry
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
A Gardner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
L Cheatle
2 player
A Healy
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Perry
2 player
S Ecclestone
Weak Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
E Perry
2 player
C Bray
Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E Perry
2 player
M Brown
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
E Perry
2 player
C Sippel
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Perry
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Perry
2 player
S Bryce
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Perry
2 player
A Kerr
No Correlation
0.52
1 player
E Perry
2 player
L Cheatle
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Perry
2 player
E Perry
Strong Positive Correlation
0.58
1 player
E Perry
2 player
A Gardner
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Perry
2 player
A Healy
Weak Negative Correlation
0.27
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
S Ecclestone
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
C Bray
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.1
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
M Brown
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
C Sippel
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
S Bryce
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
A Kerr
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
L Cheatle
Weak Positive Correlation
0.58
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
E Perry
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
A Gardner
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Gardner
2 player
A Healy
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Healy
2 player
S Ecclestone
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
A Healy
2 player
C Bray
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Healy
2 player
M Brown
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Healy
2 player
C Sippel
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Healy
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
A Healy
2 player
S Bryce
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Healy
2 player
A Kerr
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Healy
2 player
L Cheatle
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Healy
2 player
E Perry
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Healy
2 player
A Gardner
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Healy
2 player
A Healy
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick S Ecclestone and C Bray together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Bray and E Perry together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Brown and C Sippel together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick C Sippel and S Bryce together
Positive Correlation

Pick S Ecclestone and S Bryce together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Brown and A Kerr together
Negative Correlation

Pick H Armitage and A Kerr together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Bryce and A Kerr together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 E Perry

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Bray 0.67
A Gardner 0.58
L Cheatle 0.52
S Ecclestone 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
A Healy -0.33
M Brown -0.2
C Sippel -0.11

2 A Gardner

AR
Similar Perfomance
E Perry 0.58
L Cheatle 0.36
A Kerr 0.35
S Ecclestone 0.27
Opposite Perfomance
C Sippel -0.56
C Bray -0.33
H Armitage -0.33
S Bryce -0.33
A Healy -0.11
M Brown -0.1

3 L Cheatle

BOW
Similar Perfomance
E Perry 0.52
A Healy 0.4
A Gardner 0.36
C Sippel 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
A Kerr -0.35
M Brown -0.05

4 S Ecclestone

BOW
Similar Perfomance
A Kerr 0.7
C Bray 0.67
E Perry 0.33
A Gardner 0.27
Opposite Perfomance
S Bryce -0.67
M Brown -0.43
C Sippel -0.43
A Healy -0.11

5 C Bray

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Ecclestone 0.67
E Perry 0.67
H Armitage 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
S Bryce -0.33
A Gardner -0.33
A Healy -0.23
M Brown -0.14
C Sippel -0.11

Best BRS Player Combinations

Best BRS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
N de Klerk AR BRS
L Hamilton BOW BRS
G Redmayne WK BRS
N Hancock BOW BRS
G Harris BAT BRS
C Knott AR BRS
L Harris BAT BRS
J Jonassen AR BRS
G Parsons BOW BRS
S Pandey BOW BRS
J Rodrigues BAT BRS
N de Klerk
L Hamilton
G Redmayne
N Hancock
G Harris
C Knott
L Harris
J Jonassen
G Parsons
S Pandey
J Rodrigues
1
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
N de Klerk
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
L Hamilton
Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
G Redmayne
Strong Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
N Hancock
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
0
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
L Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
J Jonassen
Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
G Parsons
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
S Pandey
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
N de Klerk
2 player
J Rodrigues
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
N de Klerk
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
L Hamilton
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
G Harris
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
L Harris
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
J Jonassen
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
G Parsons
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
S Pandey
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
J Rodrigues
Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
N de Klerk
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
G Redmayne
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
L Harris
Weak Negative Correlation
0.22
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.71
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
G Parsons
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
S Pandey
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
J Rodrigues
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
N de Klerk
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
N Hancock
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
0
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
G Parsons
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
S Pandey
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
J Rodrigues
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
G Harris
2 player
N de Klerk
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Harris
2 player
L Hamilton
Negative Correlation
-0.18
1 player
G Harris
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
G Harris
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Harris
2 player
G Harris
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
G Harris
2 player
C Knott
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
G Harris
2 player
L Harris
Weak Negative Correlation
0.22
1 player
G Harris
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
G Harris
2 player
G Parsons
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
G Harris
2 player
S Pandey
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
G Harris
2 player
J Rodrigues
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Knott
2 player
N de Klerk
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Knott
2 player
L Hamilton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
C Knott
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Knott
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
C Knott
2 player
G Harris
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
C Knott
2 player
C Knott
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.29
1 player
C Knott
2 player
L Harris
Weak Negative Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Knott
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Knott
2 player
G Parsons
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Knott
2 player
S Pandey
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
C Knott
2 player
J Rodrigues
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Harris
2 player
N de Klerk
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Harris
2 player
L Hamilton
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Harris
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Negative Correlation
0.12
1 player
L Harris
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
L Harris
2 player
G Harris
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.29
1 player
L Harris
2 player
C Knott
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
L Harris
2 player
L Harris
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.54
1 player
L Harris
2 player
J Jonassen
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Harris
2 player
G Parsons
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Harris
2 player
S Pandey
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Harris
2 player
J Rodrigues
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
N de Klerk
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.3
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
N Hancock
Weak Negative Correlation
0.22
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
G Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.54
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
L Harris
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
J Jonassen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
G Parsons
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
S Pandey
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
J Rodrigues
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
N de Klerk
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
L Hamilton
Positive Correlation
0.71
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
G Redmayne
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
N Hancock
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
G Harris
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
G Parsons
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
S Pandey
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
G Parsons
2 player
J Rodrigues
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
N de Klerk
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
L Hamilton
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
N Hancock
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
C Knott
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
J Jonassen
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
G Parsons
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
S Pandey
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
J Rodrigues
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
N de Klerk
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
L Hamilton
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
N Hancock
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
G Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
C Knott
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
J Jonassen
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
G Parsons
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
S Pandey
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Rodrigues
2 player
J Rodrigues
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Pick N de Klerk and G Redmayne together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick N de Klerk and J Jonassen together
Negative Correlation

Pick L Hamilton and G Harris together
Negative Correlation

Pick L Hamilton and S Pandey together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 J Jonassen

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Pandey 0.42
G Parsons 0.33
C Knott 0.28
G Redmayne 0.22
G Harris 0.22
Opposite Perfomance
N de Klerk -0.67
L Harris -0.54
N Hancock -0.3

2 C Knott

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Pandey 0.42
L Hamilton 0.33
J Jonassen 0.28
G Redmayne 0.26
Opposite Perfomance
J Rodrigues -0.35
L Harris -0.29
G Harris -0.25
G Parsons -0.14

3 G Redmayne

WK
Similar Perfomance
G Parsons 0.71
C Knott 0.26
J Jonassen 0.22
S Pandey 0.14
N Hancock 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
N de Klerk -1
J Rodrigues -0.35
L Harris -0.33
G Harris -0.18
L Hamilton -0.14

4 N Hancock

BOW
Similar Perfomance
N de Klerk 0.42
L Harris 0.12
G Harris 0.09
G Redmayne 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
S Pandey -0.42
G Parsons -0.33
J Jonassen -0.3
J Rodrigues -0.23

5 G Harris

BAT
Similar Perfomance
J Rodrigues 0.35
J Jonassen 0.22
S Pandey 0.14
N Hancock 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
L Hamilton -0.7
G Parsons -0.42
L Harris -0.27
C Knott -0.25
G Redmayne -0.18

More on PL Labs

SYS vs BRS

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only