Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
SK 18 Sep 11:30 pm OBI

Lineup Out

Boland Park
Boland T10 League

Best Player Combinations For
SK vs OBI

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

SK vs OBI

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best SK Player Combinations

Best SK Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
E Cunningham AR SK
C Olivier AR SK
R Henry BOW SK
A Hanekom BAT SK
D Ross Watt BOW SK
R Rhode BOW SK
T Cornelissen AR SK
L Smit BAT SK
M de-Vries WK SK
W Brand WK SK
A Gqamane BOW SK
E Cunningham
C Olivier
R Henry
A Hanekom
D Ross Watt
R Rhode
T Cornelissen
L Smit
M de-Vries
W Brand
A Gqamane
1
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
E Cunningham
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
C Olivier
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
R Henry
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
A Hanekom
Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
D Ross Watt
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.04
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
R Rhode
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
T Cornelissen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
L Smit
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
M de-Vries
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
W Brand
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
A Gqamane
Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
C Olivier
2 player
E Cunningham
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Olivier
2 player
C Olivier
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
C Olivier
2 player
R Henry
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
C Olivier
2 player
A Hanekom
Weak Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
C Olivier
2 player
D Ross Watt
Strong Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
C Olivier
2 player
R Rhode
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
C Olivier
2 player
T Cornelissen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Olivier
2 player
L Smit
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Olivier
2 player
M de-Vries
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
C Olivier
2 player
W Brand
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
C Olivier
2 player
A Gqamane
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
R Henry
2 player
E Cunningham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
R Henry
2 player
C Olivier
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Henry
2 player
R Henry
Strong Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
R Henry
2 player
A Hanekom
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
R Henry
2 player
D Ross Watt
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Henry
2 player
R Rhode
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
R Henry
2 player
T Cornelissen
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
R Henry
2 player
L Smit
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
R Henry
2 player
M de-Vries
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
R Henry
2 player
W Brand
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
R Henry
2 player
A Gqamane
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
E Cunningham
Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
C Olivier
Weak Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
R Henry
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
A Hanekom
Strong Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
D Ross Watt
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
R Rhode
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
T Cornelissen
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
L Smit
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
M de-Vries
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
W Brand
Weak Positive Correlation
0.65
1 player
A Hanekom
2 player
A Gqamane
Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
D Ross Watt
2 player
E Cunningham
Weak Negative Correlation
0.8
1 player
D Ross Watt
2 player
C Olivier
Strong Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
D Ross Watt
2 player
R Henry
Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
D Ross Watt
2 player
A Hanekom
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Ross Watt
2 player
D Ross Watt
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
D Ross Watt
2 player
R Rhode
Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
D Ross Watt
2 player
T Cornelissen
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
D Ross Watt
2 player
L Smit
Weak Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
D Ross Watt
2 player
M de-Vries
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
D Ross Watt
2 player
W Brand
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
D Ross Watt
2 player
A Gqamane
Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
R Rhode
2 player
E Cunningham
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
R Rhode
2 player
C Olivier
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Rhode
2 player
R Henry
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
R Rhode
2 player
A Hanekom
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Rhode
2 player
D Ross Watt
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Rhode
2 player
R Rhode
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
R Rhode
2 player
T Cornelissen
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
R Rhode
2 player
L Smit
Weak Negative Correlation
0.29
1 player
R Rhode
2 player
M de-Vries
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
R Rhode
2 player
W Brand
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
R Rhode
2 player
A Gqamane
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
T Cornelissen
2 player
E Cunningham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
T Cornelissen
2 player
C Olivier
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
T Cornelissen
2 player
R Henry
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
T Cornelissen
2 player
A Hanekom
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
T Cornelissen
2 player
D Ross Watt
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
T Cornelissen
2 player
R Rhode
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Cornelissen
2 player
T Cornelissen
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
T Cornelissen
2 player
L Smit
Weak Negative Correlation
0.28
1 player
T Cornelissen
2 player
M de-Vries
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
T Cornelissen
2 player
W Brand
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
T Cornelissen
2 player
A Gqamane
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
L Smit
2 player
E Cunningham
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
L Smit
2 player
C Olivier
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
L Smit
2 player
R Henry
Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
L Smit
2 player
A Hanekom
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
L Smit
2 player
D Ross Watt
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
L Smit
2 player
R Rhode
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
L Smit
2 player
T Cornelissen
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
L Smit
2 player
L Smit
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Smit
2 player
M de-Vries
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
L Smit
2 player
W Brand
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Smit
2 player
A Gqamane
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
M de-Vries
2 player
E Cunningham
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
M de-Vries
2 player
C Olivier
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
M de-Vries
2 player
R Henry
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
M de-Vries
2 player
A Hanekom
Weak Positive Correlation
0.8
1 player
M de-Vries
2 player
D Ross Watt
Strong Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
M de-Vries
2 player
R Rhode
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
M de-Vries
2 player
T Cornelissen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M de-Vries
2 player
L Smit
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M de-Vries
2 player
M de-Vries
Strong Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
M de-Vries
2 player
W Brand
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
M de-Vries
2 player
A Gqamane
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
W Brand
2 player
E Cunningham
Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
W Brand
2 player
C Olivier
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
W Brand
2 player
R Henry
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
W Brand
2 player
A Hanekom
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
W Brand
2 player
D Ross Watt
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
W Brand
2 player
R Rhode
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
W Brand
2 player
T Cornelissen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
W Brand
2 player
L Smit
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
W Brand
2 player
M de-Vries
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
W Brand
2 player
W Brand
Strong Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
W Brand
2 player
A Gqamane
Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
A Gqamane
2 player
E Cunningham
Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
A Gqamane
2 player
C Olivier
Weak Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
A Gqamane
2 player
R Henry
Positive Correlation
0.65
1 player
A Gqamane
2 player
A Hanekom
Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
A Gqamane
2 player
D Ross Watt
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
A Gqamane
2 player
R Rhode
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
A Gqamane
2 player
T Cornelissen
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Gqamane
2 player
L Smit
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
A Gqamane
2 player
M de-Vries
Weak Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
A Gqamane
2 player
W Brand
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Gqamane
2 player
A Gqamane
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick C Olivier and D Ross Watt together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick R Henry and L Smit together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Hanekom and A Gqamane together
Positive Correlation

Pick D Ross Watt and R Rhode together
Positive Correlation

Pick D Ross Watt and M de-Vries together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick L Smit and M de-Vries together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 E Cunningham

AR
Similar Perfomance
W Brand 0.5
A Gqamane 0.49
A Hanekom 0.47
T Cornelissen 0.27
R Henry 0.26
M de-Vries 0.17
Opposite Perfomance
D Ross Watt -0.28
C Olivier -0.06
R Rhode -0.04
L Smit -0.03

2 A Gqamane

BOW
Similar Perfomance
A Hanekom 0.65
W Brand 0.54
E Cunningham 0.49
R Henry 0.49
D Ross Watt 0.45
R Rhode 0.39
M de-Vries 0.31
T Cornelissen 0.26
C Olivier 0.24

3 R Rhode

BOW
Similar Perfomance
D Ross Watt 0.7
A Gqamane 0.39
C Olivier 0.32
M de-Vries 0.29
A Hanekom 0.28
R Henry 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
L Smit -0.22
W Brand -0.09
E Cunningham -0.04
T Cornelissen -0.01

4 A Hanekom

BAT
Similar Perfomance
A Gqamane 0.65
D Ross Watt 0.55
R Henry 0.51
E Cunningham 0.47
W Brand 0.36
C Olivier 0.31
R Rhode 0.28
M de-Vries 0.26
T Cornelissen 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
L Smit -0.07

5 R Henry

BOW
Similar Perfomance
L Smit 0.6
A Hanekom 0.51
A Gqamane 0.49
D Ross Watt 0.48
W Brand 0.47
M de-Vries 0.29
E Cunningham 0.26
R Rhode 0.23
C Olivier 0.22
Opposite Perfomance
T Cornelissen -0.09

Best OBI Player Combinations

Best OBI Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
L Botha AR OBI
D Philmon WK OBI
C Deelman BOW OBI
N Swartland BOW OBI
B Swiegers BAT OBI
G Wolmerans BAT OBI
L Dennis BOW OBI
R Abrahams BOW OBI
V Adams WK OBI
K Opperman BOW OBI
A Mgijima AR OBI
L Botha
D Philmon
C Deelman
N Swartland
B Swiegers
G Wolmerans
L Dennis
R Abrahams
V Adams
K Opperman
A Mgijima
1
1 player
L Botha
2 player
L Botha
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Botha
2 player
D Philmon
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
L Botha
2 player
C Deelman
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
L Botha
2 player
N Swartland
Weak Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
L Botha
2 player
B Swiegers
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
L Botha
2 player
G Wolmerans
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
L Botha
2 player
L Dennis
Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
L Botha
2 player
R Abrahams
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
L Botha
2 player
V Adams
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
L Botha
2 player
K Opperman
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
L Botha
2 player
A Mgijima
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
L Botha
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
D Philmon
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
C Deelman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
N Swartland
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
B Swiegers
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
G Wolmerans
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
L Dennis
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
R Abrahams
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
V Adams
Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
K Opperman
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
A Mgijima
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
L Botha
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
D Philmon
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
C Deelman
Strong Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
N Swartland
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
B Swiegers
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
G Wolmerans
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
L Dennis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
R Abrahams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
V Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
K Opperman
Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
A Mgijima
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
L Botha
Weak Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
D Philmon
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
C Deelman
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
N Swartland
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
B Swiegers
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
G Wolmerans
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
L Dennis
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
R Abrahams
Positive Correlation
0.65
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
V Adams
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
K Opperman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
A Mgijima
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
L Botha
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
D Philmon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
C Deelman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
N Swartland
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
B Swiegers
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
G Wolmerans
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
L Dennis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.64
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
R Abrahams
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
V Adams
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
K Opperman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
A Mgijima
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
L Botha
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
D Philmon
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
C Deelman
Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
N Swartland
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
B Swiegers
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
G Wolmerans
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
L Dennis
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
R Abrahams
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
V Adams
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
K Opperman
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
A Mgijima
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
L Botha
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
D Philmon
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
C Deelman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
N Swartland
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
B Swiegers
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
G Wolmerans
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
L Dennis
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
R Abrahams
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
V Adams
No Correlation
0.58
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
K Opperman
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
A Mgijima
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
L Botha
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
D Philmon
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
C Deelman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
N Swartland
Positive Correlation
0.64
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
B Swiegers
Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
G Wolmerans
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
L Dennis
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
R Abrahams
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
V Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
K Opperman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
A Mgijima
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
V Adams
2 player
L Botha
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
V Adams
2 player
D Philmon
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
V Adams
2 player
C Deelman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.65
1 player
V Adams
2 player
N Swartland
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
V Adams
2 player
B Swiegers
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
V Adams
2 player
G Wolmerans
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
V Adams
2 player
L Dennis
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
V Adams
2 player
R Abrahams
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
V Adams
2 player
V Adams
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
V Adams
2 player
K Opperman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
V Adams
2 player
A Mgijima
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
L Botha
Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
D Philmon
Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
C Deelman
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
N Swartland
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
B Swiegers
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.06
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
G Wolmerans
No Correlation
0.58
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
L Dennis
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
R Abrahams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
V Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
K Opperman
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
A Mgijima
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
L Botha
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
D Philmon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
C Deelman
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
N Swartland
Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
B Swiegers
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
G Wolmerans
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
L Dennis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
R Abrahams
No Correlation
0.52
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
V Adams
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
K Opperman
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
A Mgijima
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick N Swartland and V Adams together
Positive Correlation

Pick B Swiegers and R Abrahams together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 L Botha

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Dennis 0.5
K Opperman 0.42
G Wolmerans 0.39
C Deelman 0.32
A Mgijima 0.27
B Swiegers 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
N Swartland -0.35
R Abrahams -0.07
V Adams -0.03

2 G Wolmerans

BAT
Similar Perfomance
C Deelman 0.5
L Botha 0.39
B Swiegers 0.23
D Philmon 0.13
L Dennis 0.12
A Mgijima 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
N Swartland -0.16
V Adams -0.08
K Opperman -0.06
R Abrahams -0.05

3 C Deelman

BOW
Similar Perfomance
A Mgijima 0.56
G Wolmerans 0.5
K Opperman 0.46
L Botha 0.32
B Swiegers 0.31
N Swartland 0.29
R Abrahams 0.29
D Philmon 0.28
V Adams 0.26
L Dennis 0.2

4 A Mgijima

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Deelman 0.56
V Adams 0.52
K Opperman 0.5
N Swartland 0.42
L Dennis 0.37
D Philmon 0.34
L Botha 0.27
B Swiegers 0.19
G Wolmerans 0.11
R Abrahams 0.05

5 L Dennis

BOW
Similar Perfomance
K Opperman 0.58
L Botha 0.5
A Mgijima 0.37
B Swiegers 0.24
C Deelman 0.2
N Swartland 0.15
D Philmon 0.14
V Adams 0.14
G Wolmerans 0.12

Best SK Player Combinations

Best SK Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

High Performing Players

Best OBI Player Combinations

Best OBI Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
L Botha AR OBI
D Philmon WK OBI
C Deelman BOW OBI
N Swartland BOW OBI
B Swiegers BAT OBI
G Wolmerans BAT OBI
L Dennis BOW OBI
R Abrahams BOW OBI
V Adams WK OBI
K Opperman BOW OBI
A Mgijima AR OBI
L Botha
D Philmon
C Deelman
N Swartland
B Swiegers
G Wolmerans
L Dennis
R Abrahams
V Adams
K Opperman
A Mgijima
1
1 player
L Botha
2 player
L Botha
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
L Botha
2 player
D Philmon
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Botha
2 player
C Deelman
Weak Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
L Botha
2 player
N Swartland
Strong Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Botha
2 player
B Swiegers
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Botha
2 player
G Wolmerans
No Correlation
0.71
1 player
L Botha
2 player
L Dennis
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Botha
2 player
R Abrahams
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Botha
2 player
V Adams
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
L Botha
2 player
K Opperman
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Botha
2 player
A Mgijima
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
L Botha
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
D Philmon
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
C Deelman
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
N Swartland
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
B Swiegers
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
G Wolmerans
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
L Dennis
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
R Abrahams
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
V Adams
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
K Opperman
Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
D Philmon
2 player
A Mgijima
Strong Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
L Botha
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
D Philmon
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
C Deelman
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
N Swartland
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
B Swiegers
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
G Wolmerans
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
L Dennis
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
R Abrahams
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
V Adams
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
K Opperman
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Deelman
2 player
A Mgijima
No Correlation
-1
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
L Botha
Strong Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
D Philmon
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
C Deelman
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
N Swartland
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
B Swiegers
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
G Wolmerans
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
L Dennis
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
R Abrahams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
V Adams
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
K Opperman
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
N Swartland
2 player
A Mgijima
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
L Botha
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
D Philmon
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
C Deelman
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
N Swartland
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
B Swiegers
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
G Wolmerans
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
L Dennis
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
R Abrahams
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
V Adams
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
K Opperman
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B Swiegers
2 player
A Mgijima
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
L Botha
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
D Philmon
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
C Deelman
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
N Swartland
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
B Swiegers
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
G Wolmerans
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
L Dennis
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
R Abrahams
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
V Adams
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
K Opperman
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Wolmerans
2 player
A Mgijima
No Correlation
0.71
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
L Botha
Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
D Philmon
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
C Deelman
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
N Swartland
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
B Swiegers
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
G Wolmerans
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
L Dennis
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
R Abrahams
Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
V Adams
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
K Opperman
Positive Correlation
0.71
1 player
L Dennis
2 player
A Mgijima
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
L Botha
Weak Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
D Philmon
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
C Deelman
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
N Swartland
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
B Swiegers
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
G Wolmerans
Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
L Dennis
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
R Abrahams
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
V Adams
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
K Opperman
Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
R Abrahams
2 player
A Mgijima
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
V Adams
2 player
L Botha
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
V Adams
2 player
D Philmon
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
V Adams
2 player
C Deelman
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
V Adams
2 player
N Swartland
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
V Adams
2 player
B Swiegers
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
V Adams
2 player
G Wolmerans
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
V Adams
2 player
L Dennis
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
V Adams
2 player
R Abrahams
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
V Adams
2 player
V Adams
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
V Adams
2 player
K Opperman
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
V Adams
2 player
A Mgijima
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
L Botha
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
D Philmon
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
C Deelman
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
N Swartland
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
B Swiegers
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
G Wolmerans
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
L Dennis
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
R Abrahams
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
V Adams
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
K Opperman
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Opperman
2 player
A Mgijima
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
L Botha
Weak Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
D Philmon
Strong Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
C Deelman
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
N Swartland
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
B Swiegers
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
G Wolmerans
No Correlation
0.71
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
L Dennis
Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
R Abrahams
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
V Adams
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
K Opperman
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Mgijima
2 player
A Mgijima
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick L Botha and L Dennis together
Positive Correlation

Pick D Philmon and N Swartland together
Positive Correlation

Pick D Philmon and R Abrahams together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Deelman and K Opperman together
Positive Correlation

Pick L Dennis and A Mgijima together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Opperman and A Mgijima together
Positive Correlation

Pick L Botha and N Swartland together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick D Philmon and A Mgijima together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick B Swiegers and K Opperman together
Negative Correlation

Pick G Wolmerans and R Abrahams together
Negative Correlation

Pick L Dennis and R Abrahams together
Negative Correlation

Pick R Abrahams and A Mgijima together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 L Botha

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Dennis 0.71
K Opperman 0.42
C Deelman 0.33
A Mgijima 0.33
G Wolmerans 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
N Swartland -1
D Philmon -0.43
R Abrahams -0.33
V Adams -0.33

2 A Mgijima

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Dennis 0.71
K Opperman 0.7
L Botha 0.33
C Deelman 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
D Philmon -1
R Abrahams -0.67
N Swartland -0.33
B Swiegers -0.33
V Adams -0.33
G Wolmerans -0.14

3 C Deelman

BOW
Similar Perfomance
K Opperman 0.67
L Botha 0.33
G Wolmerans 0.25
V Adams 0.14
A Mgijima 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
B Swiegers -0.43
N Swartland -0.14
R Abrahams -0.14

4 G Wolmerans

BAT
Similar Perfomance
C Deelman 0.25
L Botha 0.14
B Swiegers 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
R Abrahams -0.67
N Swartland -0.42
V Adams -0.14
A Mgijima -0.14

5 L Dennis

BOW
Similar Perfomance
L Botha 0.71
A Mgijima 0.71
K Opperman 0.42
Opposite Perfomance
R Abrahams -0.67
D Philmon -0.43
V Adams -0.42
N Swartland -0.33

More on PL Labs

SK vs OBI

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only