Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
SCO 03 Jan 03:45 pm THU

Lineup Out

Perth Stadium
Australian T20 League

Best Player Combinations For
SCO vs THU

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

SCO vs THU

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best SCO Player Combinations

Best SCO Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
A Tye BOW SCO
J Behrendorff BOW SCO
A Turner BAT SCO
M Kelly BOW SCO
A Hardie AR SCO
M Hurst WK SCO
L Morris BOW SCO
F Allen WK SCO
N Hobson BAT SCO
C Connolly AR SCO
M Spoors AR SCO
A Tye
J Behrendorff
A Turner
M Kelly
A Hardie
M Hurst
L Morris
F Allen
N Hobson
C Connolly
M Spoors
1
1 player
A Tye
2 player
A Tye
Strong Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
A Tye
2 player
J Behrendorff
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Tye
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
0.49
1 player
A Tye
2 player
M Kelly
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
A Tye
2 player
A Hardie
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
A Tye
2 player
M Hurst
Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
A Tye
2 player
L Morris
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
A Tye
2 player
F Allen
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
A Tye
2 player
N Hobson
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Tye
2 player
C Connolly
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Tye
2 player
M Spoors
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
A Tye
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
J Behrendorff
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
A Turner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.69
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
M Kelly
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
A Hardie
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
M Hurst
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
L Morris
No Correlation
-0.28
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
F Allen
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.03
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
N Hobson
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
C Connolly
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
M Spoors
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Turner
2 player
A Tye
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Turner
2 player
J Behrendorff
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Turner
2 player
A Turner
Strong Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
A Turner
2 player
M Kelly
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
A Turner
2 player
A Hardie
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Turner
2 player
M Hurst
Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
A Turner
2 player
L Morris
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
A Turner
2 player
F Allen
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
A Turner
2 player
N Hobson
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Turner
2 player
C Connolly
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
A Turner
2 player
M Spoors
Weak Negative Correlation
0.49
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
A Tye
Positive Correlation
0.69
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
J Behrendorff
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
M Kelly
Strong Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
A Hardie
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
M Hurst
Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
L Morris
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
F Allen
No Correlation
-0.16
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
N Hobson
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
C Connolly
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
M Spoors
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
A Tye
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
J Behrendorff
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
M Kelly
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
A Hardie
Strong Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
M Hurst
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
L Morris
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
F Allen
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
N Hobson
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
C Connolly
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
M Spoors
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
A Tye
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
J Behrendorff
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
A Turner
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
M Kelly
Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
A Hardie
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
M Hurst
Strong Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
L Morris
Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
F Allen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
N Hobson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
C Connolly
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
M Spoors
No Correlation
0.41
1 player
L Morris
2 player
A Tye
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Morris
2 player
J Behrendorff
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
L Morris
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
L Morris
2 player
M Kelly
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
L Morris
2 player
A Hardie
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
L Morris
2 player
M Hurst
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Morris
2 player
L Morris
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
L Morris
2 player
F Allen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
L Morris
2 player
N Hobson
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Morris
2 player
C Connolly
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Morris
2 player
M Spoors
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
F Allen
2 player
A Tye
No Correlation
-0.28
1 player
F Allen
2 player
J Behrendorff
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.12
1 player
F Allen
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
0
1 player
F Allen
2 player
M Kelly
No Correlation
0
1 player
F Allen
2 player
A Hardie
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
F Allen
2 player
M Hurst
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
F Allen
2 player
L Morris
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
F Allen
2 player
F Allen
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
F Allen
2 player
N Hobson
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
F Allen
2 player
C Connolly
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
F Allen
2 player
M Spoors
Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
A Tye
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
J Behrendorff
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
-0.16
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
M Kelly
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
A Hardie
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
M Hurst
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
L Morris
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
F Allen
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
N Hobson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
C Connolly
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
M Spoors
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
A Tye
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
J Behrendorff
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
A Turner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
M Kelly
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
A Hardie
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
M Hurst
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
L Morris
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
F Allen
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
N Hobson
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
C Connolly
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
M Spoors
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
A Tye
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
J Behrendorff
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
A Turner
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
M Kelly
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
A Hardie
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
M Hurst
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
L Morris
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
F Allen
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
N Hobson
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
C Connolly
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
M Spoors
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick A Tye and M Spoors together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Behrendorff and M Kelly together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Kelly and M Hurst together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Kelly and L Morris together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Kelly and M Spoors together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 A Hardie

AR
Similar Perfomance
M Hurst 0.55
A Tye 0.37
J Behrendorff 0.34
M Kelly 0.32
L Morris 0.32
C Connolly 0.29
Opposite Perfomance
N Hobson -0.2
A Turner -0.07

2 J Behrendorff

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Kelly 0.69
C Connolly 0.37
A Hardie 0.34
A Tye 0.32
A Turner 0.25
L Morris 0.14
M Hurst 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
M Spoors -0.4
F Allen -0.28
N Hobson -0.03

3 A Tye

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Spoors 0.7
M Kelly 0.49
M Hurst 0.47
L Morris 0.41
A Hardie 0.37
J Behrendorff 0.32
A Turner 0.14
C Connolly 0.11
F Allen 0.1
N Hobson 0.03

4 A Turner

BAT
Similar Perfomance
M Hurst 0.42
C Connolly 0.35
J Behrendorff 0.25
A Tye 0.14
M Kelly 0.06
N Hobson 0.05
L Morris 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
M Spoors -0.4
F Allen -0.12
A Hardie -0.07

5 C Connolly

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Behrendorff 0.37
A Turner 0.35
A Hardie 0.29
M Hurst 0.28
L Morris 0.23
M Kelly 0.2
A Tye 0.11
N Hobson 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
M Spoors -0.4
F Allen -0.12

Best THU Player Combinations

Best THU Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
C Bancroft WK THU
C Green AR THU
M Gilkes WK THU
D Sams AR THU
L Ferguson BOW THU
T Andrews BOW THU
B Nikitaras BAT THU
S Billings WK THU
W Agar BOW THU
D Warner BAT THU
S Rutherford BAT THU
C Bancroft
C Green
M Gilkes
D Sams
L Ferguson
T Andrews
B Nikitaras
S Billings
W Agar
D Warner
S Rutherford
1
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
C Bancroft
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
M Gilkes
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
D Sams
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
L Ferguson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
T Andrews
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
S Billings
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.37
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
W Agar
Weak Negative Correlation
0.26
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
D Warner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
S Rutherford
Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Green
2 player
C Bancroft
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Green
2 player
C Green
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Green
2 player
M Gilkes
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Green
2 player
D Sams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Green
2 player
L Ferguson
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
C Green
2 player
T Andrews
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Green
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
C Green
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
C Green
2 player
W Agar
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Green
2 player
D Warner
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
C Green
2 player
S Rutherford
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
C Bancroft
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
C Green
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
M Gilkes
Strong Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
D Sams
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
L Ferguson
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
T Andrews
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
W Agar
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
D Warner
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
S Rutherford
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
D Sams
2 player
C Bancroft
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
D Sams
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
D Sams
2 player
M Gilkes
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Sams
2 player
D Sams
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
D Sams
2 player
L Ferguson
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Sams
2 player
T Andrews
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
D Sams
2 player
B Nikitaras
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
D Sams
2 player
S Billings
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
D Sams
2 player
W Agar
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
D Sams
2 player
D Warner
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
D Sams
2 player
S Rutherford
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
C Bancroft
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
M Gilkes
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
D Sams
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
L Ferguson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
T Andrews
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
W Agar
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
D Warner
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
S Rutherford
Weak Negative Correlation
0.55
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
C Bancroft
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
M Gilkes
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
D Sams
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
L Ferguson
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
T Andrews
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
S Billings
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
W Agar
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
D Warner
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
S Rutherford
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
C Bancroft
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
M Gilkes
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
D Sams
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
L Ferguson
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
T Andrews
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
B Nikitaras
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
W Agar
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
D Warner
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
S Rutherford
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Billings
2 player
C Bancroft
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
S Billings
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
S Billings
2 player
M Gilkes
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
S Billings
2 player
D Sams
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Billings
2 player
L Ferguson
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
S Billings
2 player
T Andrews
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Billings
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Billings
2 player
S Billings
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Billings
2 player
W Agar
Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
S Billings
2 player
D Warner
Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
S Billings
2 player
S Rutherford
No Correlation
-0.37
1 player
W Agar
2 player
C Bancroft
Weak Negative Correlation
0.02
1 player
W Agar
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
W Agar
2 player
M Gilkes
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
W Agar
2 player
D Sams
Positive Correlation
-0.3
1 player
W Agar
2 player
L Ferguson
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
W Agar
2 player
T Andrews
No Correlation
0
1 player
W Agar
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
W Agar
2 player
S Billings
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
W Agar
2 player
W Agar
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
W Agar
2 player
D Warner
Positive Correlation
-0.85
1 player
W Agar
2 player
S Rutherford
Strong Negative Correlation
0.26
1 player
D Warner
2 player
C Bancroft
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
D Warner
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
D Warner
2 player
M Gilkes
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
D Warner
2 player
D Sams
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
D Warner
2 player
L Ferguson
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
D Warner
2 player
T Andrews
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
D Warner
2 player
B Nikitaras
Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
D Warner
2 player
S Billings
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
D Warner
2 player
W Agar
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Warner
2 player
D Warner
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Warner
2 player
S Rutherford
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
C Bancroft
Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
M Gilkes
Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
D Sams
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
L Ferguson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.15
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
T Andrews
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
-0.85
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
W Agar
Strong Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
D Warner
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
S Rutherford
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick M Gilkes and S Rutherford together
Positive Correlation

Pick D Sams and W Agar together
Positive Correlation

Pick L Ferguson and T Andrews together
Positive Correlation

Pick S Billings and W Agar together
Positive Correlation

Don’t pick W Agar and S Rutherford in the same lineup
Strong Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 D Sams

AR
Similar Perfomance
W Agar 0.7
B Nikitaras 0.4
L Ferguson 0.35
D Warner 0.3
M Gilkes 0.29
C Green 0.28
S Billings 0.22
C Bancroft 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
S Rutherford -0.28

2 C Green

AR
Similar Perfomance
M Gilkes 0.42
D Sams 0.28
D Warner 0.2
T Andrews 0.1
L Ferguson 0.08
W Agar 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
S Rutherford -0.18
C Bancroft -0.09
S Billings -0.01

3 M Gilkes

WK
Similar Perfomance
S Rutherford 0.7
T Andrews 0.5
C Green 0.42
L Ferguson 0.4
D Sams 0.29
D Warner 0.29
B Nikitaras 0.15
Opposite Perfomance
S Billings -0.08
C Bancroft -0.04
W Agar -0.02

4 C Bancroft

WK
Similar Perfomance
T Andrews 0.55
S Rutherford 0.43
D Warner 0.26
S Billings 0.23
L Ferguson 0.2
D Sams 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
W Agar -0.37
C Green -0.09
M Gilkes -0.04

5 D Warner

BAT
Similar Perfomance
B Nikitaras 0.5
W Agar 0.5
S Billings 0.45
T Andrews 0.43
D Sams 0.3
M Gilkes 0.29
C Bancroft 0.26
C Green 0.2
Opposite Perfomance
L Ferguson -0.08

Best SCO Player Combinations

Best SCO Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
A Tye BOW SCO
J Behrendorff BOW SCO
A Turner BAT SCO
M Kelly BOW SCO
A Hardie AR SCO
M Hurst WK SCO
L Morris BOW SCO
F Allen WK SCO
N Hobson BAT SCO
C Connolly AR SCO
M Spoors AR SCO
A Tye
J Behrendorff
A Turner
M Kelly
A Hardie
M Hurst
L Morris
F Allen
N Hobson
C Connolly
M Spoors
1
1 player
A Tye
2 player
A Tye
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
A Tye
2 player
J Behrendorff
No Correlation
-0.24
1 player
A Tye
2 player
A Turner
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Tye
2 player
M Kelly
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
A Tye
2 player
A Hardie
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Tye
2 player
M Hurst
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Tye
2 player
L Morris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Tye
2 player
F Allen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Tye
2 player
N Hobson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.18
1 player
A Tye
2 player
C Connolly
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Tye
2 player
M Spoors
Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
A Tye
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
J Behrendorff
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
M Kelly
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
A Hardie
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
M Hurst
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
L Morris
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
F Allen
Negative Correlation
-0.3
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
N Hobson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.29
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
C Connolly
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Behrendorff
2 player
M Spoors
Negative Correlation
-0.24
1 player
A Turner
2 player
A Tye
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Turner
2 player
J Behrendorff
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Turner
2 player
A Turner
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Turner
2 player
M Kelly
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Turner
2 player
A Hardie
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Turner
2 player
M Hurst
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Turner
2 player
L Morris
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Turner
2 player
F Allen
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Turner
2 player
N Hobson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
A Turner
2 player
C Connolly
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Turner
2 player
M Spoors
Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
A Tye
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
J Behrendorff
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
M Kelly
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
A Hardie
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
M Hurst
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
L Morris
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
F Allen
Negative Correlation
-0.6
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
N Hobson
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
C Connolly
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Kelly
2 player
M Spoors
Negative Correlation
0.12
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
A Tye
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
J Behrendorff
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
M Kelly
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
A Hardie
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
M Hurst
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
L Morris
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
F Allen
No Correlation
-0.24
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
N Hobson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.12
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
C Connolly
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Hardie
2 player
M Spoors
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
A Tye
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
J Behrendorff
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
M Kelly
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
A Hardie
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
M Hurst
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
L Morris
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
F Allen
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
N Hobson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
C Connolly
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Hurst
2 player
M Spoors
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Morris
2 player
A Tye
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Morris
2 player
J Behrendorff
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
L Morris
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
L Morris
2 player
M Kelly
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Morris
2 player
A Hardie
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Morris
2 player
M Hurst
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Morris
2 player
L Morris
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Morris
2 player
F Allen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
L Morris
2 player
N Hobson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
L Morris
2 player
C Connolly
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Morris
2 player
M Spoors
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
F Allen
2 player
A Tye
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
F Allen
2 player
J Behrendorff
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
F Allen
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
F Allen
2 player
M Kelly
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
F Allen
2 player
A Hardie
No Correlation
0
1 player
F Allen
2 player
M Hurst
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
F Allen
2 player
L Morris
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
F Allen
2 player
F Allen
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
F Allen
2 player
N Hobson
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
F Allen
2 player
C Connolly
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
F Allen
2 player
M Spoors
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
A Tye
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.3
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
J Behrendorff
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
A Turner
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.6
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
M Kelly
Negative Correlation
-0.24
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
A Hardie
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
M Hurst
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
L Morris
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
F Allen
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
N Hobson
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
C Connolly
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Hobson
2 player
M Spoors
Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
A Tye
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
J Behrendorff
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
A Turner
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
M Kelly
Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
A Hardie
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
M Hurst
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
L Morris
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
F Allen
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
N Hobson
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
C Connolly
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Connolly
2 player
M Spoors
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
A Tye
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
J Behrendorff
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
A Turner
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
M Kelly
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
A Hardie
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
M Hurst
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
L Morris
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
F Allen
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
N Hobson
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
C Connolly
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Spoors
2 player
M Spoors
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick F Allen and M Spoors together
Positive Correlation

Pick N Hobson and M Spoors together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Behrendorff and M Spoors together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Turner and M Spoors together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Kelly and F Allen together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Kelly and N Hobson together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Hardie and M Hurst together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Connolly and M Spoors together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 A Hardie

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Morris 0.33
A Tye 0.12
Opposite Perfomance
M Hurst -0.7
N Hobson -0.24
C Connolly -0.12
A Turner -0.11
J Behrendorff -0.09

2 A Tye

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Spoors 0.7
F Allen 0.35
L Morris 0.33
M Hurst 0.23
M Kelly 0.2
A Hardie 0.12
Opposite Perfomance
N Hobson -0.25
A Turner -0.24
C Connolly -0.18
J Behrendorff -0.17

3 J Behrendorff

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Kelly 1
M Hurst 0.35
C Connolly 0.29
Opposite Perfomance
M Spoors -0.7
F Allen -0.42
N Hobson -0.3
A Tye -0.17
A Hardie -0.09

4 A Turner

BAT
Similar Perfomance
C Connolly 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
M Spoors -0.7
N Hobson -0.33
A Tye -0.24
F Allen -0.14
A Hardie -0.11
L Morris -0.11

5 C Connolly

AR
Similar Perfomance
M Kelly 0.42
M Hurst 0.35
J Behrendorff 0.29
A Turner 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
M Spoors -0.7
F Allen -0.42
L Morris -0.23
A Tye -0.18
A Hardie -0.12

Best THU Player Combinations

Best THU Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
C Bancroft WK THU
C Green AR THU
M Gilkes WK THU
D Sams AR THU
L Ferguson BOW THU
T Andrews BOW THU
B Nikitaras BAT THU
S Billings WK THU
W Agar BOW THU
D Warner BAT THU
S Rutherford BAT THU
C Bancroft
C Green
M Gilkes
D Sams
L Ferguson
T Andrews
B Nikitaras
S Billings
W Agar
D Warner
S Rutherford
1
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
C Bancroft
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
C Green
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
M Gilkes
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
D Sams
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
L Ferguson
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
T Andrews
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
-1
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
S Billings
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
W Agar
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
D Warner
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Bancroft
2 player
S Rutherford
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
C Green
2 player
C Bancroft
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
C Green
2 player
C Green
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
C Green
2 player
M Gilkes
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
C Green
2 player
D Sams
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Green
2 player
L Ferguson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Green
2 player
T Andrews
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Green
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Green
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Green
2 player
W Agar
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
C Green
2 player
D Warner
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Green
2 player
S Rutherford
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
C Bancroft
Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
M Gilkes
Strong Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
D Sams
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
L Ferguson
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
T Andrews
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
B Nikitaras
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
S Billings
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
W Agar
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
D Warner
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Gilkes
2 player
S Rutherford
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Sams
2 player
C Bancroft
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
D Sams
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
D Sams
2 player
M Gilkes
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Sams
2 player
D Sams
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
D Sams
2 player
L Ferguson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
D Sams
2 player
T Andrews
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Sams
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Sams
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
D Sams
2 player
W Agar
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Sams
2 player
D Warner
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
D Sams
2 player
S Rutherford
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
C Bancroft
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
C Green
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
M Gilkes
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
D Sams
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
L Ferguson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
T Andrews
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
W Agar
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
D Warner
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
L Ferguson
2 player
S Rutherford
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
C Bancroft
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
C Green
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
M Gilkes
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
D Sams
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
L Ferguson
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
T Andrews
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
W Agar
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
D Warner
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Andrews
2 player
S Rutherford
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
C Bancroft
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
M Gilkes
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
D Sams
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
L Ferguson
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
T Andrews
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
B Nikitaras
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
W Agar
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
D Warner
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B Nikitaras
2 player
S Rutherford
No Correlation
-1
1 player
S Billings
2 player
C Bancroft
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Billings
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
S Billings
2 player
M Gilkes
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Billings
2 player
D Sams
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Billings
2 player
L Ferguson
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Billings
2 player
T Andrews
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Billings
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Billings
2 player
S Billings
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Billings
2 player
W Agar
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Billings
2 player
D Warner
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
S Billings
2 player
S Rutherford
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
W Agar
2 player
C Bancroft
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
W Agar
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
W Agar
2 player
M Gilkes
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
W Agar
2 player
D Sams
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
W Agar
2 player
L Ferguson
No Correlation
0
1 player
W Agar
2 player
T Andrews
No Correlation
0
1 player
W Agar
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
W Agar
2 player
S Billings
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
W Agar
2 player
W Agar
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
W Agar
2 player
D Warner
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
W Agar
2 player
S Rutherford
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Warner
2 player
C Bancroft
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
D Warner
2 player
C Green
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Warner
2 player
M Gilkes
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Warner
2 player
D Sams
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Warner
2 player
L Ferguson
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
D Warner
2 player
T Andrews
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
D Warner
2 player
B Nikitaras
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Warner
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
D Warner
2 player
W Agar
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Warner
2 player
D Warner
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
D Warner
2 player
S Rutherford
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
C Bancroft
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
C Green
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
M Gilkes
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
D Sams
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
L Ferguson
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
T Andrews
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
B Nikitaras
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
S Billings
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
W Agar
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
D Warner
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Rutherford
2 player
S Rutherford
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick M Gilkes and L Ferguson together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Gilkes and T Andrews together
Positive Correlation

Pick W Agar and D Warner together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Bancroft and S Billings together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick C Green and T Andrews together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Gilkes and B Nikitaras together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Gilkes and W Agar together
Negative Correlation

Pick D Sams and S Rutherford together
Negative Correlation

Pick B Nikitaras and D Warner together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 D Sams

AR
Similar Perfomance
W Agar 0.7
L Ferguson 0.35
C Green 0.07
M Gilkes 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
S Rutherford -0.7
T Andrews -0.23

2 C Green

AR
Similar Perfomance
M Gilkes 0.18
D Sams 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
T Andrews -0.7
D Warner -0.45
C Bancroft -0.43
L Ferguson -0.23
S Rutherford -0.23
S Billings -0.14
W Agar -0.14

3 M Gilkes

WK
Similar Perfomance
L Ferguson 0.7
T Andrews 0.7
S Rutherford 0.7
C Green 0.18
D Sams 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
B Nikitaras -0.7
W Agar -0.7
C Bancroft -0.43
S Billings -0.35

4 D Warner

BAT
Similar Perfomance
W Agar 0.7
T Andrews 0.23
C Bancroft 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
B Nikitaras -0.7
C Green -0.45
S Rutherford -0.35

5 C Bancroft

WK
Similar Perfomance
S Rutherford 0.35
D Warner 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
S Billings -1
C Green -0.43
M Gilkes -0.43
W Agar -0.23

More on PL Labs

SCO vs THU

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only