Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
SAU-W 06 Oct 05:00 am TAS-W

Lineup Out

Karen Rolton Oval
Womens National Cricket League

Best Player Combinations For
SAU-W vs TAS-W

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

SAU-W vs TAS-W

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best SAU-W Player Combinations

Best SAU-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
E Larosa AR SAU-W
C Webb BAT SAU-W
A Wellington AR SAU-W
B Patterson WK SAU-W
J Barsby AR SAU-W
H Armitage BAT SAU-W
M Penna AR SAU-W
C Neale BOW SAU-W
E de Broughe BAT SAU-W
K Peterson BOW SAU-W
E Johnston WK SAU-W
E Larosa
C Webb
A Wellington
B Patterson
J Barsby
H Armitage
M Penna
C Neale
E de Broughe
K Peterson
E Johnston
1
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
E Larosa
Strong Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
C Webb
Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
B Patterson
Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
J Barsby
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
M Penna
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
C Neale
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
E de Broughe
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
K Peterson
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
E Johnston
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
C Webb
2 player
E Larosa
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Webb
2 player
C Webb
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Webb
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
C Webb
2 player
B Patterson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Webb
2 player
J Barsby
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Webb
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
C Webb
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
C Webb
2 player
C Neale
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
C Webb
2 player
E de Broughe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
C Webb
2 player
K Peterson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
C Webb
2 player
E Johnston
Weak Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
E Larosa
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
A Wellington
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
B Patterson
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
J Barsby
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
C Neale
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
E de Broughe
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
K Peterson
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
E Johnston
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
E Larosa
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
C Webb
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
B Patterson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
J Barsby
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
H Armitage
Negative Correlation
0.07
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
C Neale
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
E de Broughe
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
K Peterson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
E Johnston
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
E Larosa
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
B Patterson
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
J Barsby
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
H Armitage
Strong Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
C Neale
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
E de Broughe
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
K Peterson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
E Johnston
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E Larosa
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
C Webb
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
B Patterson
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
J Barsby
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
H Armitage
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
M Penna
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
C Neale
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E de Broughe
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Peterson
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E Johnston
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Penna
2 player
E Larosa
Weak Negative Correlation
0.1
1 player
M Penna
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
M Penna
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
M Penna
2 player
B Patterson
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
M Penna
2 player
J Barsby
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Penna
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Penna
2 player
M Penna
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Penna
2 player
C Neale
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
M Penna
2 player
E de Broughe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
M Penna
2 player
K Peterson
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
M Penna
2 player
E Johnston
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Neale
2 player
E Larosa
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
C Neale
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Neale
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
C Neale
2 player
B Patterson
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
C Neale
2 player
J Barsby
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Neale
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Neale
2 player
M Penna
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Neale
2 player
C Neale
Strong Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
C Neale
2 player
E de Broughe
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Neale
2 player
K Peterson
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Neale
2 player
E Johnston
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
E Larosa
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
C Webb
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
B Patterson
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
J Barsby
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Negative Correlation
0.26
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
M Penna
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
C Neale
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
E de Broughe
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
K Peterson
No Correlation
-0.28
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
E Johnston
Weak Negative Correlation
0.04
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
E Larosa
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
C Webb
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
B Patterson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
J Barsby
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
H Armitage
Negative Correlation
0.12
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
C Neale
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
E de Broughe
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
K Peterson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
E Johnston
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
E Larosa
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
C Webb
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
B Patterson
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
J Barsby
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
H Armitage
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
C Neale
No Correlation
-0.28
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
E de Broughe
Weak Negative Correlation
0.27
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
K Peterson
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
E Johnston
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick E Larosa and J Barsby together
Positive Correlation

Pick E Larosa and H Armitage together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Wellington and H Armitage together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Barsby and H Armitage together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick H Armitage and M Penna together
Positive Correlation

Pick H Armitage and E Johnston together
Strong Positive Correlation

Don’t Pick B Patterson and H Armitage together
Negative Correlation

Don’t Pick H Armitage and K Peterson together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 A Wellington

AR
Similar Perfomance
H Armitage 0.7
E Larosa 0.57
J Barsby 0.45
C Neale 0.14
C Webb 0.11
M Penna 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
B Patterson -0.05
E Johnston -0.04
K Peterson -0.03
E de Broughe -0.02

2 J Barsby

AR
Similar Perfomance
H Armitage 1
E Larosa 0.62
A Wellington 0.45
K Peterson 0.29
C Webb 0.14
E Johnston 0.14
E de Broughe 0.09
B Patterson 0.03
M Penna 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
C Neale -0.02

3 C Webb

BAT
Similar Perfomance
E Larosa 0.47
H Armitage 0.4
B Patterson 0.39
E de Broughe 0.27
K Peterson 0.22
E Johnston 0.22
J Barsby 0.14
C Neale 0.12
A Wellington 0.11
M Penna 0.1

4 B Patterson

WK
Similar Perfomance
E Larosa 0.42
C Webb 0.39
K Peterson 0.23
E Johnston 0.14
E de Broughe 0.11
M Penna 0.07
C Neale 0.04
J Barsby 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
H Armitage -0.7
A Wellington -0.05

5 E de Broughe

BAT
Similar Perfomance
C Neale 0.46
C Webb 0.27
M Penna 0.26
K Peterson 0.18
B Patterson 0.11
J Barsby 0.09
E Larosa 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
H Armitage -0.4
E Johnston -0.28
A Wellington -0.02

Best TAS-W Player Combinations

Best TAS-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
L Lee BAT TAS-W
J Cavanough BOW TAS-W
T Saville BAT TAS-W
N Stalenberg BAT TAS-W
M Gibson BOW TAS-W
M Strano BOW TAS-W
L Smith BOW TAS-W
E Manix-Geeves WK TAS-W
R Johnston BAT TAS-W
N Carey AR TAS-W
E Villani BAT TAS-W
L Lee
J Cavanough
T Saville
N Stalenberg
M Gibson
M Strano
L Smith
E Manix-Geeves
R Johnston
N Carey
E Villani
1
1 player
L Lee
2 player
L Lee
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
L Lee
2 player
J Cavanough
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Lee
2 player
T Saville
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Lee
2 player
N Stalenberg
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
L Lee
2 player
M Gibson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
L Lee
2 player
M Strano
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
L Lee
2 player
L Smith
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
L Lee
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
Weak Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
L Lee
2 player
R Johnston
Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
L Lee
2 player
N Carey
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
L Lee
2 player
E Villani
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
L Lee
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
J Cavanough
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
T Saville
Weak Negative Correlation
0.19
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
N Stalenberg
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
M Gibson
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
M Strano
No Correlation
-1
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
L Smith
Strong Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
No Correlation
-0.55
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
R Johnston
Negative Correlation
-0.1
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
N Carey
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
E Villani
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Saville
2 player
L Lee
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
T Saville
2 player
J Cavanough
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
T Saville
2 player
T Saville
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
T Saville
2 player
N Stalenberg
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
T Saville
2 player
M Gibson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
T Saville
2 player
M Strano
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
T Saville
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
T Saville
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Saville
2 player
R Johnston
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
T Saville
2 player
N Carey
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
T Saville
2 player
E Villani
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
L Lee
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
J Cavanough
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
T Saville
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
N Stalenberg
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
M Gibson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
M Strano
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
L Smith
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
R Johnston
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
N Carey
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
E Villani
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
L Lee
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
J Cavanough
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
T Saville
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
N Stalenberg
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
M Gibson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
M Strano
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
R Johnston
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
N Carey
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
E Villani
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
M Strano
2 player
L Lee
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Strano
2 player
J Cavanough
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
M Strano
2 player
T Saville
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
M Strano
2 player
N Stalenberg
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Strano
2 player
M Gibson
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Strano
2 player
M Strano
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Strano
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
M Strano
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
M Strano
2 player
R Johnston
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
M Strano
2 player
N Carey
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Strano
2 player
E Villani
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
L Smith
2 player
L Lee
No Correlation
-1
1 player
L Smith
2 player
J Cavanough
Strong Negative Correlation
0.22
1 player
L Smith
2 player
T Saville
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
L Smith
2 player
N Stalenberg
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Smith
2 player
M Gibson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Smith
2 player
M Strano
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Smith
2 player
L Smith
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Smith
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
L Smith
2 player
R Johnston
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
L Smith
2 player
N Carey
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Smith
2 player
E Villani
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
L Lee
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
J Cavanough
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
T Saville
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
N Stalenberg
No Correlation
0.41
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
M Gibson
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
M Strano
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
L Smith
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
R Johnston
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
N Carey
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
E Villani
Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
L Lee
Positive Correlation
-0.55
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
J Cavanough
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
T Saville
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
N Stalenberg
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
M Gibson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.34
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
M Strano
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
R Johnston
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
N Carey
Negative Correlation
0.3
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
E Villani
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
N Carey
2 player
L Lee
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
N Carey
2 player
J Cavanough
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
N Carey
2 player
T Saville
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N Carey
2 player
N Stalenberg
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
N Carey
2 player
M Gibson
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
N Carey
2 player
M Strano
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
N Carey
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
N Carey
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
N Carey
2 player
R Johnston
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
N Carey
2 player
N Carey
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
N Carey
2 player
E Villani
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
E Villani
2 player
L Lee
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
E Villani
2 player
J Cavanough
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
E Villani
2 player
T Saville
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Villani
2 player
N Stalenberg
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
E Villani
2 player
M Gibson
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
E Villani
2 player
M Strano
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Villani
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
E Villani
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
E Villani
2 player
R Johnston
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
E Villani
2 player
N Carey
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Villani
2 player
E Villani
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick N Stalenberg and R Johnston together
Positive Correlation

Don’t pick J Cavanough and L Smith in the same lineup
Strong Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 N Carey

AR
Similar Perfomance
M Strano 0.34
L Smith 0.28
M Gibson 0.14
L Lee 0.04
E Manix-Geeves 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
R Johnston -0.5
N Stalenberg -0.14
J Cavanough -0.1
E Villani -0.08
T Saville -0.04

2 M Strano

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Gibson 0.4
R Johnston 0.34
N Carey 0.34
L Smith 0.33
L Lee 0.32
T Saville 0.28
E Manix-Geeves 0.15
J Cavanough 0.14
E Villani 0.11
N Stalenberg 0.09

3 E Villani

BAT
Similar Perfomance
T Saville 0.47
M Gibson 0.42
E Manix-Geeves 0.42
L Smith 0.33
R Johnston 0.3
N Stalenberg 0.2
M Strano 0.11
L Lee 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
J Cavanough -0.09
N Carey -0.08

4 E Manix-Geeves

WK
Similar Perfomance
E Villani 0.42
M Gibson 0.41
L Lee 0.34
R Johnston 0.2
N Stalenberg 0.19
T Saville 0.18
M Strano 0.15
L Smith 0.14
J Cavanough 0.09
N Carey 0.02

5 N Stalenberg

BAT
Similar Perfomance
R Johnston 0.7
M Gibson 0.35
T Saville 0.34
L Lee 0.23
E Villani 0.2
J Cavanough 0.19
E Manix-Geeves 0.19
L Smith 0.16
M Strano 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
N Carey -0.14

Best SAU-W Player Combinations

Best SAU-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
E Larosa AR SAU-W
C Webb BAT SAU-W
A Wellington AR SAU-W
B Patterson WK SAU-W
J Barsby AR SAU-W
H Armitage BAT SAU-W
M Penna AR SAU-W
C Neale BOW SAU-W
E de Broughe BAT SAU-W
K Peterson BOW SAU-W
E Johnston WK SAU-W
E Larosa
C Webb
A Wellington
B Patterson
J Barsby
H Armitage
M Penna
C Neale
E de Broughe
K Peterson
E Johnston
1
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
E Larosa
Strong Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
C Webb
Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
B Patterson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
J Barsby
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
M Penna
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
C Neale
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
E de Broughe
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
K Peterson
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Larosa
2 player
E Johnston
Weak Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
C Webb
2 player
E Larosa
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Webb
2 player
C Webb
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
C Webb
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Webb
2 player
B Patterson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Webb
2 player
J Barsby
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Webb
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
C Webb
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
C Webb
2 player
C Neale
Negative Correlation
0.07
1 player
C Webb
2 player
E de Broughe
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
C Webb
2 player
K Peterson
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Webb
2 player
E Johnston
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
E Larosa
Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
A Wellington
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.21
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
B Patterson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.54
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
J Barsby
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
C Neale
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.21
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
E de Broughe
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.36
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
K Peterson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
E Johnston
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
E Larosa
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
C Webb
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.21
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
B Patterson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.29
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
J Barsby
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
H Armitage
Negative Correlation
-0.46
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
M Penna
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
C Neale
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
E de Broughe
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
K Peterson
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Patterson
2 player
E Johnston
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
E Larosa
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
-0.29
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
B Patterson
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
J Barsby
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
C Neale
Weak Negative Correlation
0.07
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
E de Broughe
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
K Peterson
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Barsby
2 player
E Johnston
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E Larosa
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
C Webb
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
B Patterson
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
J Barsby
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
H Armitage
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
M Penna
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
C Neale
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E de Broughe
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Peterson
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E Johnston
Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
M Penna
2 player
E Larosa
Negative Correlation
-0.15
1 player
M Penna
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Penna
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
-0.46
1 player
M Penna
2 player
B Patterson
Negative Correlation
0.04
1 player
M Penna
2 player
J Barsby
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Penna
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Penna
2 player
M Penna
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Penna
2 player
C Neale
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
M Penna
2 player
E de Broughe
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Penna
2 player
K Peterson
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Penna
2 player
E Johnston
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Neale
2 player
E Larosa
Negative Correlation
-0.56
1 player
C Neale
2 player
C Webb
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
C Neale
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
C Neale
2 player
B Patterson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
C Neale
2 player
J Barsby
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Neale
2 player
H Armitage
Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Neale
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Neale
2 player
C Neale
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Neale
2 player
E de Broughe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Neale
2 player
K Peterson
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Neale
2 player
E Johnston
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
E Larosa
Weak Negative Correlation
0.07
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
-0.21
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
B Patterson
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
J Barsby
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
H Armitage
Negative Correlation
0.15
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
C Neale
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
E de Broughe
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
K Peterson
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
E de Broughe
2 player
E Johnston
Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
E Larosa
Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
-0.36
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
B Patterson
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
J Barsby
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
H Armitage
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
C Neale
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
E de Broughe
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
K Peterson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
K Peterson
2 player
E Johnston
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
E Larosa
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
C Webb
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
B Patterson
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
J Barsby
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
C Neale
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
E de Broughe
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
K Peterson
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Johnston
2 player
E Johnston
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick E Larosa and C Webb together
Positive Correlation

Pick E Larosa and A Wellington together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Webb and H Armitage together
Positive Correlation

Pick E Larosa and M Penna together
Negative Correlation

Pick E Larosa and C Neale together
Negative Correlation

Pick H Armitage and C Neale together
Negative Correlation

Pick H Armitage and E de Broughe together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 A Wellington

AR
Similar Perfomance
H Armitage 0.7
E Larosa 0.67
J Barsby 0.54
M Penna 0.08
C Webb 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
K Peterson -0.36
C Neale -0.33
B Patterson -0.21
E de Broughe -0.21
E Johnston -0.14

2 J Barsby

AR
Similar Perfomance
H Armitage 0.7
E Larosa 0.67
A Wellington 0.54
C Webb 0.14
E Johnston 0.14
K Peterson 0.08
E de Broughe 0.07
M Penna 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
C Neale -0.33
B Patterson -0.29

3 C Webb

BAT
Similar Perfomance
H Armitage 0.7
E Larosa 0.67
B Patterson 0.33
J Barsby 0.14
E Johnston 0.14
A Wellington 0.07
E de Broughe 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
C Neale -0.56
M Penna -0.15
K Peterson -0.08

4 E de Broughe

BAT
Similar Perfomance
C Neale 0.33
M Penna 0.15
K Peterson 0.08
C Webb 0.07
J Barsby 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
H Armitage -0.7
E Johnston -0.42
E Larosa -0.33
A Wellington -0.21
B Patterson -0.2

5 M Penna

AR
Similar Perfomance
H Armitage 0.7
E de Broughe 0.15
C Neale 0.11
A Wellington 0.08
J Barsby 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
E Larosa -0.67
B Patterson -0.46
C Webb -0.15
E Johnston -0.14

Best TAS-W Player Combinations

Best TAS-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
L Lee BAT TAS-W
J Cavanough BOW TAS-W
T Saville BAT TAS-W
N Stalenberg BAT TAS-W
M Gibson BOW TAS-W
M Strano BOW TAS-W
L Smith BOW TAS-W
E Manix-Geeves WK TAS-W
R Johnston BAT TAS-W
N Carey AR TAS-W
E Villani BAT TAS-W
L Lee
J Cavanough
T Saville
N Stalenberg
M Gibson
M Strano
L Smith
E Manix-Geeves
R Johnston
N Carey
E Villani
1
1 player
L Lee
2 player
L Lee
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Lee
2 player
J Cavanough
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
L Lee
2 player
T Saville
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Lee
2 player
N Stalenberg
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Lee
2 player
M Gibson
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
L Lee
2 player
M Strano
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
L Lee
2 player
L Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
L Lee
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Lee
2 player
R Johnston
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
L Lee
2 player
N Carey
No Correlation
-0.16
1 player
L Lee
2 player
E Villani
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
L Lee
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
J Cavanough
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
T Saville
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
N Stalenberg
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
M Gibson
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
M Strano
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
L Smith
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
R Johnston
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
N Carey
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Cavanough
2 player
E Villani
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
T Saville
2 player
L Lee
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Saville
2 player
J Cavanough
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
T Saville
2 player
T Saville
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
T Saville
2 player
N Stalenberg
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Saville
2 player
M Gibson
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Saville
2 player
M Strano
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Saville
2 player
L Smith
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
T Saville
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Saville
2 player
R Johnston
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
T Saville
2 player
N Carey
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Saville
2 player
E Villani
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
L Lee
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
J Cavanough
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
T Saville
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
N Stalenberg
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
M Gibson
No Correlation
-0.31
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
M Strano
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
L Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
R Johnston
Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
N Carey
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N Stalenberg
2 player
E Villani
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
L Lee
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
J Cavanough
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
T Saville
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
N Stalenberg
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
M Gibson
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
M Strano
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
L Smith
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
R Johnston
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
N Carey
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
M Gibson
2 player
E Villani
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
M Strano
2 player
L Lee
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Strano
2 player
J Cavanough
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Strano
2 player
T Saville
No Correlation
-0.31
1 player
M Strano
2 player
N Stalenberg
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Strano
2 player
M Gibson
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Strano
2 player
M Strano
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
M Strano
2 player
L Smith
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
M Strano
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Strano
2 player
R Johnston
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
M Strano
2 player
N Carey
Positive Correlation
-0.31
1 player
M Strano
2 player
E Villani
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.38
1 player
L Smith
2 player
L Lee
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Smith
2 player
J Cavanough
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
L Smith
2 player
T Saville
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Smith
2 player
N Stalenberg
Weak Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
L Smith
2 player
M Gibson
Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
L Smith
2 player
M Strano
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Smith
2 player
L Smith
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
L Smith
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
L Smith
2 player
R Johnston
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Smith
2 player
N Carey
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Smith
2 player
E Villani
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
L Lee
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
J Cavanough
Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
T Saville
Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
N Stalenberg
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
M Gibson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
M Strano
Weak Negative Correlation
0.07
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
L Smith
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
R Johnston
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
N Carey
Weak Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
E Manix-Geeves
2 player
E Villani
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
L Lee
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
J Cavanough
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
T Saville
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
N Stalenberg
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
M Gibson
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
M Strano
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
L Smith
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
R Johnston
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
N Carey
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Johnston
2 player
E Villani
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
N Carey
2 player
L Lee
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N Carey
2 player
J Cavanough
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
N Carey
2 player
T Saville
Negative Correlation
-0.15
1 player
N Carey
2 player
N Stalenberg
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
N Carey
2 player
M Gibson
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
N Carey
2 player
M Strano
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
N Carey
2 player
L Smith
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
N Carey
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N Carey
2 player
R Johnston
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
N Carey
2 player
N Carey
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.36
1 player
N Carey
2 player
E Villani
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.16
1 player
E Villani
2 player
L Lee
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Villani
2 player
J Cavanough
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
E Villani
2 player
T Saville
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
E Villani
2 player
N Stalenberg
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
E Villani
2 player
M Gibson
No Correlation
-0.31
1 player
E Villani
2 player
M Strano
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Villani
2 player
L Smith
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
E Villani
2 player
E Manix-Geeves
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Villani
2 player
R Johnston
No Correlation
-0.36
1 player
E Villani
2 player
N Carey
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
E Villani
2 player
E Villani
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Pick J Cavanough and T Saville together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Cavanough and R Johnston together
Negative Correlation

Pick R Johnston and N Carey together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 N Carey

AR
Similar Perfomance
M Strano 0.48
L Smith 0.33
M Gibson 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
R Johnston -0.7
T Saville -0.5
E Villani -0.36
E Manix-Geeves -0.23
L Lee -0.2
N Stalenberg -0.15
J Cavanough -0.14

2 M Strano

BOW
Similar Perfomance
N Carey 0.48
L Lee 0.18
T Saville 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
N Stalenberg -0.31
E Villani -0.31
E Manix-Geeves -0.23
L Smith -0.17
J Cavanough -0.14
R Johnston -0.14

3 E Villani

BAT
Similar Perfomance
E Manix-Geeves 0.43
J Cavanough 0.14
L Smith 0.14
R Johnston 0.14
M Gibson 0.12
Opposite Perfomance
N Carey -0.36
M Strano -0.31
L Lee -0.16
T Saville -0.14
N Stalenberg -0.14

4 E Manix-Geeves

WK
Similar Perfomance
E Villani 0.43
M Gibson 0.29
R Johnston 0.14
L Smith 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
T Saville -0.5
J Cavanough -0.43
M Strano -0.23
N Carey -0.23
L Lee -0.2
N Stalenberg -0.2

5 L Smith

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Gibson 0.43
N Carey 0.33
E Villani 0.14
E Manix-Geeves 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
J Cavanough -0.7
L Lee -0.38
N Stalenberg -0.33
R Johnston -0.23
M Strano -0.17

More on PL Labs

SAU-W vs TAS-W

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only