Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
OS-W 29 Dec 05:10 am AH-W

Lineup Out

Molyneux Park
Women New Zealand T20 Domestic

Best Player Combinations For
OS-W vs AH-W

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

OS-W vs AH-W

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best OS-W Player Combinations

Best OS-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
A Browning AR OS-W
K Gordon BOW OS-W
B James WK OS-W
E Carson BOW OS-W
C Blakely BAT OS-W
H Jensen AR OS-W
E Black AR OS-W
F Leydon-Davis AR OS-W
O Gain BAT OS-W
P Inglis WK OS-W
S Bates AR OS-W
A Browning
K Gordon
B James
E Carson
C Blakely
H Jensen
E Black
F Leydon-Davis
O Gain
P Inglis
S Bates
1
1 player
A Browning
2 player
A Browning
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Browning
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
A Browning
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.8
1 player
A Browning
2 player
E Carson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.77
1 player
A Browning
2 player
C Blakely
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
A Browning
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
A Browning
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
A Browning
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
A Browning
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
A Browning
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
A Browning
2 player
S Bates
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
K Gordon
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
E Carson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
S Bates
Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
B James
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
B James
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B James
2 player
B James
Strong Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
B James
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
B James
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
B James
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
B James
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
B James
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.63
1 player
B James
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
B James
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
B James
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0.8
1 player
E Carson
2 player
A Browning
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Carson
2 player
K Gordon
Strong Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
E Carson
2 player
B James
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Carson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
E Carson
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
E Carson
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.52
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
E Carson
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
E Carson
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
E Carson
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
E Carson
2 player
S Bates
Positive Correlation
0.77
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
A Browning
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
C Blakely
Strong Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
K Gordon
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
H Jensen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
E Black
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
E Black
2 player
K Gordon
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
E Black
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.52
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Carson
Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
E Black
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
E Black
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Black
Strong Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
E Black
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
E Black
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
E Black
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
E Black
2 player
S Bates
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
A Browning
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
C Blakely
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
O Gain
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
O Gain
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
0.63
1 player
O Gain
2 player
B James
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
O Gain
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
O Gain
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
O Gain
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
O Gain
2 player
O Gain
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
O Gain
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
O Gain
2 player
S Bates
Weak Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
A Browning
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
P Inglis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
S Bates
2 player
A Browning
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Bates
2 player
K Gordon
Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
S Bates
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
S Bates
2 player
E Carson
Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
S Bates
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
S Bates
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
S Bates
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
S Bates
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
S Bates
2 player
O Gain
Weak Negative Correlation
0.13
1 player
S Bates
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Bates
2 player
S Bates
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick A Browning and E Carson together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick A Browning and C Blakely together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Gordon and E Carson together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick K Gordon and E Black together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Gordon and S Bates together
Positive Correlation

Pick B James and O Gain together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 S Bates

AR
Similar Perfomance
K Gordon 0.7
A Browning 0.48
E Carson 0.43
E Black 0.41
H Jensen 0.22
P Inglis 0.13
Opposite Perfomance
O Gain -0.27
C Blakely -0.1
B James -0.05
F Leydon-Davis -0.04

2 E Black

AR
Similar Perfomance
K Gordon 0.62
E Carson 0.52
S Bates 0.41
F Leydon-Davis 0.36
H Jensen 0.34
P Inglis 0.21
A Browning 0.15
B James 0.13
O Gain 0.05
C Blakely 0.03

3 E Carson

BOW
Similar Perfomance
K Gordon 1
A Browning 0.8
E Black 0.52
S Bates 0.43
F Leydon-Davis 0.22
P Inglis 0.2
H Jensen 0.18
O Gain 0.15
B James 0.13
C Blakely 0.13

4 H Jensen

AR
Similar Perfomance
F Leydon-Davis 0.48
K Gordon 0.4
P Inglis 0.36
E Black 0.34
S Bates 0.22
C Blakely 0.19
E Carson 0.18
A Browning 0.13
B James 0.13
O Gain 0.1

5 P Inglis

WK
Similar Perfomance
F Leydon-Davis 0.43
A Browning 0.38
H Jensen 0.36
B James 0.35
C Blakely 0.35
O Gain 0.33
K Gordon 0.28
E Black 0.21
E Carson 0.2
S Bates 0.13

Best AH-W Player Combinations

Best AH-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
I Gaze WK AH-W
B Illing BOW AH-W
L Down BAT AH-W
S Shahri BAT AH-W
B Armstrong BAT AH-W
F Jonas BOW AH-W
B Halliday AR AH-W
M Penfold BOW AH-W
M Green WK AH-W
J Penfold AR AH-W
P Catton BAT AH-W
I Gaze
B Illing
L Down
S Shahri
B Armstrong
F Jonas
B Halliday
M Penfold
M Green
J Penfold
P Catton
1
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
I Gaze
Strong Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
L Down
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
B Armstrong
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
B Halliday
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.31
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
M Green
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
B Illing
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Illing
2 player
B Illing
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Illing
2 player
L Down
Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
B Illing
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
B Illing
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
B Illing
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
B Illing
2 player
B Halliday
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
B Illing
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
B Illing
2 player
M Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Illing
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
B Illing
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
L Down
2 player
I Gaze
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Down
2 player
B Illing
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
L Down
2 player
L Down
Strong Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
L Down
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Down
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
L Down
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
L Down
2 player
B Halliday
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
L Down
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
L Down
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
L Down
2 player
J Penfold
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
L Down
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
L Down
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
S Shahri
Strong Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
B Armstrong
Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
B Halliday
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
I Gaze
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
L Down
Weak Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
S Shahri
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
B Armstrong
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.26
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
B Halliday
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
F Jonas
Strong Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
B Halliday
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
M Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
I Gaze
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
B Illing
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
-0.26
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Negative Correlation
0.44
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
F Jonas
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
B Halliday
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
L Down
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
B Halliday
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
M Penfold
Strong Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.31
1 player
M Green
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Negative Correlation
0.3
1 player
M Green
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
M Green
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
M Green
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Green
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Green
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
M Green
2 player
B Halliday
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
M Green
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Green
2 player
M Green
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.19
1 player
M Green
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
M Green
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
L Down
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
B Halliday
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.19
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
J Penfold
Strong Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
P Catton
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
P Catton
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
P Catton
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
P Catton
2 player
L Down
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
P Catton
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
P Catton
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
P Catton
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
P Catton
2 player
B Halliday
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
P Catton
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
P Catton
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
P Catton
2 player
J Penfold
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Catton
2 player
P Catton
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick I Gaze and L Down together
Positive Correlation

Pick I Gaze and B Armstrong together
Positive Correlation

Pick I Gaze and B Halliday together
Positive Correlation

Don’t pick B Illing and L Down in the same lineup
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 F Jonas

BOW
Similar Perfomance
B Halliday 0.44
M Penfold 0.36
P Catton 0.34
B Armstrong 0.3
M Green 0.2
B Illing 0.18
L Down 0.15
J Penfold 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
S Shahri -0.02

2 M Penfold

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Penfold 0.36
F Jonas 0.36
B Armstrong 0.33
P Catton 0.31
I Gaze 0.26
B Illing 0.26
S Shahri 0.23
L Down 0.2
B Halliday 0.18
M Green 0.06

3 B Armstrong

BAT
Similar Perfomance
I Gaze 0.6
S Shahri 0.51
L Down 0.33
M Penfold 0.33
F Jonas 0.3
B Illing 0.26
P Catton 0.12
J Penfold 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
B Halliday -0.26
M Green -0.14

4 S Shahri

BAT
Similar Perfomance
B Armstrong 0.51
I Gaze 0.35
L Down 0.32
M Penfold 0.23
B Halliday 0.16
J Penfold 0.16
Opposite Perfomance
M Green -0.17
P Catton -0.11
B Illing -0.08
F Jonas -0.02

5 M Green

WK
Similar Perfomance
B Illing 0.3
F Jonas 0.2
B Halliday 0.07
M Penfold 0.06
P Catton 0.01
Opposite Perfomance
I Gaze -0.31
J Penfold -0.19
S Shahri -0.17
B Armstrong -0.14
L Down -0.02

Best OS-W Player Combinations

Best OS-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
A Browning AR OS-W
K Gordon BOW OS-W
B James WK OS-W
E Carson BOW OS-W
C Blakely BAT OS-W
H Jensen AR OS-W
E Black AR OS-W
F Leydon-Davis AR OS-W
O Gain BAT OS-W
P Inglis WK OS-W
S Bates AR OS-W
A Browning
K Gordon
B James
E Carson
C Blakely
H Jensen
E Black
F Leydon-Davis
O Gain
P Inglis
S Bates
1
1 player
A Browning
2 player
A Browning
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Browning
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Browning
2 player
B James
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Browning
2 player
E Carson
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Browning
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Browning
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
A Browning
2 player
E Black
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Browning
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
A Browning
2 player
O Gain
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Browning
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Browning
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
K Gordon
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
B James
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
E Carson
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
O Gain
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
S Bates
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B James
2 player
A Browning
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
B James
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
B James
2 player
B James
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
B James
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
B James
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
B James
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
B James
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
B James
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
0.57
1 player
B James
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B James
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
B James
2 player
S Bates
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Carson
2 player
A Browning
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Carson
2 player
K Gordon
Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
E Carson
2 player
B James
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Carson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
E Carson
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
E Carson
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
E Carson
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
E Carson
2 player
O Gain
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.04
1 player
E Carson
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
E Carson
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
A Browning
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
B James
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
C Blakely
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Black
Weak Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
-0.48
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
S Bates
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
A Browning
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
K Gordon
Positive Correlation
-0.3
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
B James
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.05
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
H Jensen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
E Black
2 player
A Browning
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
E Black
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
E Black
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
E Black
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Negative Correlation
0.05
1 player
E Black
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Black
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Black
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Black
2 player
O Gain
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.1
1 player
E Black
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
E Black
2 player
S Bates
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
A Browning
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
B James
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
E Black
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.76
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
S Bates
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
O Gain
2 player
A Browning
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
O Gain
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Negative Correlation
0.57
1 player
O Gain
2 player
B James
Positive Correlation
-0.3
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Carson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.12
1 player
O Gain
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
O Gain
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Black
Weak Negative Correlation
0.26
1 player
O Gain
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
O Gain
2 player
O Gain
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
O Gain
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.37
1 player
O Gain
2 player
S Bates
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
A Browning
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
B James
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
P Inglis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
S Bates
2 player
A Browning
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Bates
2 player
K Gordon
Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
S Bates
2 player
B James
Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
S Bates
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
-0.48
1 player
S Bates
2 player
C Blakely
Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
S Bates
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
S Bates
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
-0.76
1 player
S Bates
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Negative Correlation
-0.37
1 player
S Bates
2 player
O Gain
Weak Negative Correlation
0.04
1 player
S Bates
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Bates
2 player
S Bates
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick A Browning and P Inglis together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Gordon and H Jensen together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Browning and B James together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Browning and F Leydon-Davis together
Negative Correlation

Pick F Leydon-Davis and S Bates together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 E Black

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Bates 0.45
E Carson 0.33
H Jensen 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
C Blakely -0.38
A Browning -0.35
F Leydon-Davis -0.33
O Gain -0.33
B James -0.11
P Inglis -0.1

2 E Carson

BOW
Similar Perfomance
A Browning 0.7
K Gordon 0.7
E Black 0.33
S Bates 0.18
Opposite Perfomance
O Gain -0.3
F Leydon-Davis -0.18
B James -0.13
C Blakely -0.12
H Jensen -0.05
P Inglis -0.04

3 S Bates

AR
Similar Perfomance
K Gordon 0.7
E Black 0.45
A Browning 0.35
E Carson 0.18
P Inglis 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
F Leydon-Davis -0.76
C Blakely -0.48
B James -0.43
O Gain -0.37
H Jensen -0.2

4 P Inglis

WK
Similar Perfomance
A Browning 0.7
K Gordon 0.35
O Gain 0.2
S Bates 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
F Leydon-Davis -0.27
C Blakely -0.13
E Black -0.1
H Jensen -0.09
E Carson -0.04

5 H Jensen

AR
Similar Perfomance
K Gordon 0.7
A Browning 0.23
E Black 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
B James -0.3
S Bates -0.2
C Blakely -0.09
P Inglis -0.09
O Gain -0.06
E Carson -0.05

Best AH-W Player Combinations

Best AH-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
I Gaze WK AH-W
B Illing BOW AH-W
L Down BAT AH-W
S Shahri BAT AH-W
B Armstrong BAT AH-W
F Jonas BOW AH-W
B Halliday AR AH-W
M Penfold BOW AH-W
M Green WK AH-W
J Penfold AR AH-W
P Catton BAT AH-W
I Gaze
B Illing
L Down
S Shahri
B Armstrong
F Jonas
B Halliday
M Penfold
M Green
J Penfold
P Catton
1
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
I Gaze
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
L Down
Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
B Halliday
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
M Green
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
P Catton
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Illing
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Illing
2 player
B Illing
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Illing
2 player
L Down
Negative Correlation
-0.56
1 player
B Illing
2 player
S Shahri
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Illing
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Illing
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Illing
2 player
B Halliday
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Illing
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Illing
2 player
M Green
Weak Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
B Illing
2 player
J Penfold
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
B Illing
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Down
2 player
I Gaze
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Down
2 player
B Illing
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
L Down
2 player
L Down
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
L Down
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Down
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
L Down
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
L Down
2 player
B Halliday
Negative Correlation
-0.12
1 player
L Down
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
L Down
2 player
M Green
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Down
2 player
J Penfold
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Down
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
B Illing
Negative Correlation
-0.12
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
S Shahri
Strong Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
-0.53
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
F Jonas
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
B Halliday
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
M Green
Weak Negative Correlation
0.4
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
J Penfold
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
P Catton
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
L Down
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
B Armstrong
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
B Halliday
Negative Correlation
-0.05
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
J Penfold
Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
B Armstrong
2 player
P Catton
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
0
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
-0.53
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
S Shahri
Negative Correlation
-0.22
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
F Jonas
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
B Halliday
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
M Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
F Jonas
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
L Down
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
B Armstrong
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
B Halliday
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
M Green
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
B Halliday
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
L Down
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
B Halliday
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
M Penfold
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
M Green
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
M Green
2 player
I Gaze
Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
M Green
2 player
B Illing
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Green
2 player
L Down
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Green
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Green
2 player
B Armstrong
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Green
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Green
2 player
B Halliday
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
M Green
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Green
2 player
M Green
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
M Green
2 player
J Penfold
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Green
2 player
P Catton
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
-1
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
B Illing
Strong Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
L Down
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
S Shahri
Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
B Armstrong
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
F Jonas
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
B Halliday
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
M Green
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
J Penfold
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
P Catton
2 player
I Gaze
Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
P Catton
2 player
B Illing
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
P Catton
2 player
L Down
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
P Catton
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
P Catton
2 player
B Armstrong
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
P Catton
2 player
F Jonas
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
P Catton
2 player
B Halliday
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
P Catton
2 player
M Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
P Catton
2 player
M Green
Weak Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
P Catton
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Catton
2 player
P Catton
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick L Down and J Penfold together
Positive Correlation

Pick B Illing and J Penfold together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick B Armstrong and B Halliday together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 F Jonas

BOW
Similar Perfomance
P Catton 0.33
M Green 0.2
B Halliday 0.14
M Penfold 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
S Shahri -0.53
B Armstrong -0.22
L Down -0.2
I Gaze -0.09

2 S Shahri

BAT
Similar Perfomance
J Penfold 0.4
B Halliday 0.14
B Armstrong 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
B Illing -0.56
F Jonas -0.53
M Green -0.33
P Catton -0.33
I Gaze -0.17
L Down -0.12

3 M Penfold

BOW
Similar Perfomance
P Catton 0.33
F Jonas 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
I Gaze -0.27
L Down -0.12
M Green -0.09
B Armstrong -0.05

4 M Green

WK
Similar Perfomance
B Illing 0.25
F Jonas 0.2
Opposite Perfomance
I Gaze -0.5
J Penfold -0.43
L Down -0.35
B Halliday -0.35
S Shahri -0.33
P Catton -0.33
B Armstrong -0.14
M Penfold -0.09

5 B Armstrong

BAT
Similar Perfomance
L Down 0.33
I Gaze 0.25
B Illing 0.14
S Shahri 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
B Halliday -0.7
J Penfold -0.43
P Catton -0.27
F Jonas -0.22
M Green -0.14
M Penfold -0.05

More on PL Labs

OS-W vs AH-W

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only