Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
NWW 22 May 03:15 pm LLG

Lineup Out

Bready Cricket Club, Magheramason
Ireland Inter-Provincial Limited Over Cup

Best Player Combinations For
NWW vs LLG

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

NWW vs LLG

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best NWW Player Combinations

Best NWW Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
G Roulston BAT NWW
C Melly BAT NWW
K Hilton WK NWW
S Getkate BAT NWW
A McBrine AR NWW
S Doheny WK NWW
G Hume BOW NWW
H Zimmermann BOW NWW
R MacBeth AR NWW
S Macbeth AR NWW
G Roulston
C Melly
K Hilton
S Getkate
A McBrine
S Doheny
G Hume
H Zimmermann
R MacBeth
S Macbeth
1
1 player
G Roulston
2 player
G Roulston
Strong Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
G Roulston
2 player
C Melly
Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
G Roulston
2 player
K Hilton
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
G Roulston
2 player
S Getkate
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Roulston
2 player
A McBrine
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
G Roulston
2 player
S Doheny
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
G Roulston
2 player
G Hume
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Roulston
2 player
H Zimmermann
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
G Roulston
2 player
R MacBeth
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
G Roulston
2 player
S Macbeth
Weak Negative Correlation
0.48
1 player
C Melly
2 player
G Roulston
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Melly
2 player
C Melly
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Melly
2 player
K Hilton
Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
C Melly
2 player
S Getkate
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
C Melly
2 player
A McBrine
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Melly
2 player
S Doheny
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Melly
2 player
G Hume
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
C Melly
2 player
H Zimmermann
Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
C Melly
2 player
R MacBeth
Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
C Melly
2 player
S Macbeth
Weak Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
K Hilton
2 player
G Roulston
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Hilton
2 player
C Melly
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Hilton
2 player
K Hilton
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
K Hilton
2 player
S Getkate
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
K Hilton
2 player
A McBrine
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
K Hilton
2 player
S Doheny
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Hilton
2 player
G Hume
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
K Hilton
2 player
H Zimmermann
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
K Hilton
2 player
R MacBeth
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
K Hilton
2 player
S Macbeth
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
S Getkate
2 player
G Roulston
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
S Getkate
2 player
C Melly
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
S Getkate
2 player
K Hilton
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Getkate
2 player
S Getkate
Strong Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
S Getkate
2 player
A McBrine
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
S Getkate
2 player
S Doheny
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
S Getkate
2 player
G Hume
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
S Getkate
2 player
H Zimmermann
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
S Getkate
2 player
R MacBeth
Weak Negative Correlation
0.31
1 player
S Getkate
2 player
S Macbeth
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A McBrine
2 player
G Roulston
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
A McBrine
2 player
C Melly
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
A McBrine
2 player
K Hilton
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
A McBrine
2 player
S Getkate
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A McBrine
2 player
A McBrine
Strong Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
A McBrine
2 player
S Doheny
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
A McBrine
2 player
G Hume
No Correlation
0.85
1 player
A McBrine
2 player
H Zimmermann
Strong Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
A McBrine
2 player
R MacBeth
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
A McBrine
2 player
S Macbeth
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
S Doheny
2 player
G Roulston
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Doheny
2 player
C Melly
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
S Doheny
2 player
K Hilton
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
S Doheny
2 player
S Getkate
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
S Doheny
2 player
A McBrine
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Doheny
2 player
S Doheny
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Doheny
2 player
G Hume
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
S Doheny
2 player
H Zimmermann
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
S Doheny
2 player
R MacBeth
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
S Doheny
2 player
S Macbeth
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
G Hume
2 player
G Roulston
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
G Hume
2 player
C Melly
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Hume
2 player
K Hilton
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
G Hume
2 player
S Getkate
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
G Hume
2 player
A McBrine
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Hume
2 player
S Doheny
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Hume
2 player
G Hume
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Hume
2 player
H Zimmermann
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
G Hume
2 player
R MacBeth
Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
G Hume
2 player
S Macbeth
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Zimmermann
2 player
G Roulston
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
H Zimmermann
2 player
C Melly
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
H Zimmermann
2 player
K Hilton
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
H Zimmermann
2 player
S Getkate
Weak Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
H Zimmermann
2 player
A McBrine
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
H Zimmermann
2 player
S Doheny
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Zimmermann
2 player
G Hume
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
H Zimmermann
2 player
H Zimmermann
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Zimmermann
2 player
R MacBeth
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
H Zimmermann
2 player
S Macbeth
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
R MacBeth
2 player
G Roulston
Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
R MacBeth
2 player
C Melly
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
R MacBeth
2 player
K Hilton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
R MacBeth
2 player
S Getkate
Weak Negative Correlation
0.21
1 player
R MacBeth
2 player
A McBrine
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
R MacBeth
2 player
S Doheny
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
R MacBeth
2 player
G Hume
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
R MacBeth
2 player
H Zimmermann
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R MacBeth
2 player
R MacBeth
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
R MacBeth
2 player
S Macbeth
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
S Macbeth
2 player
G Roulston
Weak Negative Correlation
0.31
1 player
S Macbeth
2 player
C Melly
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
S Macbeth
2 player
K Hilton
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
S Macbeth
2 player
S Getkate
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
S Macbeth
2 player
A McBrine
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
S Macbeth
2 player
S Doheny
Weak Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
S Macbeth
2 player
G Hume
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Macbeth
2 player
H Zimmermann
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Macbeth
2 player
R MacBeth
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Macbeth
2 player
S Macbeth
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick A McBrine and H Zimmermann together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick G Hume and H Zimmermann together
Positive Correlation

Pick H Zimmermann and R MacBeth together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 S Macbeth

AR
Similar Perfomance
G Hume 0.51
A McBrine 0.38
C Melly 0.31
S Getkate 0.31
S Doheny 0.27
H Zimmermann 0.14
R MacBeth 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
G Roulston -0.4
K Hilton -0.2

2 S Doheny

WK
Similar Perfomance
K Hilton 0.48
S Getkate 0.3
G Roulston 0.28
S Macbeth 0.27
G Hume 0.2
A McBrine 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
H Zimmermann -0.2
R MacBeth -0.01

3 R MacBeth

AR
Similar Perfomance
H Zimmermann 0.7
G Hume 0.5
C Melly 0.46
G Roulston 0.42
K Hilton 0.36
A McBrine 0.21
S Macbeth 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
S Getkate -0.22
S Doheny -0.01

4 G Hume

BOW
Similar Perfomance
H Zimmermann 0.7
S Macbeth 0.51
C Melly 0.5
R MacBeth 0.5
S Doheny 0.2
A McBrine 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
S Getkate -0.17
G Roulston -0.15

5 S Getkate

BAT
Similar Perfomance
A McBrine 0.54
G Roulston 0.35
H Zimmermann 0.32
S Macbeth 0.31
S Doheny 0.3
Opposite Perfomance
R MacBeth -0.22
K Hilton -0.2
G Hume -0.17
C Melly -0.03

Best LLG Player Combinations

Best LLG Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
S Harbinson AR LLG
C Defreitas BAT LLG
S Modgil AR LLG
D Delany AR LLG
T Tector BAT LLG
M O Reilly BOW LLG
S Lynch WK LLG
G Hoey BOW LLG
R Wilson BOW LLG
S Harbinson
C Defreitas
S Modgil
D Delany
T Tector
M O Reilly
S Lynch
G Hoey
R Wilson
1
1 player
S Harbinson
2 player
S Harbinson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
S Harbinson
2 player
C Defreitas
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
S Harbinson
2 player
S Modgil
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
S Harbinson
2 player
D Delany
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
S Harbinson
2 player
T Tector
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
S Harbinson
2 player
M O Reilly
Weak Negative Correlation
0.32
1 player
S Harbinson
2 player
S Lynch
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.24
1 player
S Harbinson
2 player
G Hoey
Weak Negative Correlation
0.02
1 player
S Harbinson
2 player
R Wilson
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Defreitas
2 player
S Harbinson
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Defreitas
2 player
C Defreitas
Strong Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
C Defreitas
2 player
S Modgil
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
C Defreitas
2 player
D Delany
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
C Defreitas
2 player
T Tector
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
C Defreitas
2 player
M O Reilly
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
C Defreitas
2 player
S Lynch
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Defreitas
2 player
G Hoey
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Defreitas
2 player
R Wilson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
S Modgil
2 player
S Harbinson
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
S Modgil
2 player
C Defreitas
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Modgil
2 player
S Modgil
Strong Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
S Modgil
2 player
D Delany
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Modgil
2 player
T Tector
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
S Modgil
2 player
M O Reilly
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Modgil
2 player
S Lynch
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Modgil
2 player
G Hoey
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Modgil
2 player
R Wilson
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
D Delany
2 player
S Harbinson
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
D Delany
2 player
C Defreitas
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
D Delany
2 player
S Modgil
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Delany
2 player
D Delany
Strong Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
D Delany
2 player
T Tector
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
D Delany
2 player
M O Reilly
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
D Delany
2 player
S Lynch
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
D Delany
2 player
G Hoey
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
D Delany
2 player
R Wilson
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
T Tector
2 player
S Harbinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
T Tector
2 player
C Defreitas
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
T Tector
2 player
S Modgil
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
T Tector
2 player
D Delany
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Tector
2 player
T Tector
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Tector
2 player
M O Reilly
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
T Tector
2 player
S Lynch
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
T Tector
2 player
G Hoey
No Correlation
0.46
1 player
T Tector
2 player
R Wilson
Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
M O Reilly
2 player
S Harbinson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.55
1 player
M O Reilly
2 player
C Defreitas
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
M O Reilly
2 player
S Modgil
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
M O Reilly
2 player
D Delany
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
M O Reilly
2 player
T Tector
No Correlation
1
1 player
M O Reilly
2 player
M O Reilly
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
M O Reilly
2 player
S Lynch
Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
M O Reilly
2 player
G Hoey
No Correlation
0
1 player
M O Reilly
2 player
R Wilson
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
S Lynch
2 player
S Harbinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
S Lynch
2 player
C Defreitas
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Lynch
2 player
S Modgil
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
S Lynch
2 player
D Delany
Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
S Lynch
2 player
T Tector
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
S Lynch
2 player
M O Reilly
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Lynch
2 player
S Lynch
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
S Lynch
2 player
G Hoey
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
S Lynch
2 player
R Wilson
Positive Correlation
-0.24
1 player
G Hoey
2 player
S Harbinson
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
G Hoey
2 player
C Defreitas
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
G Hoey
2 player
S Modgil
Weak Negative Correlation
0.16
1 player
G Hoey
2 player
D Delany
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
G Hoey
2 player
T Tector
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
G Hoey
2 player
M O Reilly
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
G Hoey
2 player
S Lynch
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Hoey
2 player
G Hoey
Strong Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
G Hoey
2 player
R Wilson
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
R Wilson
2 player
S Harbinson
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
R Wilson
2 player
C Defreitas
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Wilson
2 player
S Modgil
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Wilson
2 player
D Delany
Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
R Wilson
2 player
T Tector
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Wilson
2 player
M O Reilly
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
R Wilson
2 player
S Lynch
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
R Wilson
2 player
G Hoey
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Wilson
2 player
R Wilson
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick C Defreitas and S Modgil together
Positive Correlation

Pick S Modgil and S Lynch together
Positive Correlation

Pick D Delany and R Wilson together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 G Hoey

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Lynch 0.18
D Delany 0.16
R Wilson 0.16
T Tector 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
S Modgil -0.33
S Harbinson -0.24
M O Reilly -0.02

2 D Delany

AR
Similar Perfomance
R Wilson 0.7
C Defreitas 0.48
S Lynch 0.48
T Tector 0.44
G Hoey 0.16
S Harbinson 0.13
S Modgil 0.13
M O Reilly 0.12

3 R Wilson

BOW
Similar Perfomance
D Delany 0.7
S Lynch 0.55
T Tector 0.46
C Defreitas 0.35
G Hoey 0.16
S Harbinson 0.02

4 T Tector

BAT
Similar Perfomance
R Wilson 0.46
S Lynch 0.45
D Delany 0.44
C Defreitas 0.34
S Modgil 0.23
S Harbinson 0.21
M O Reilly 0.14
G Hoey 0.09

5 S Harbinson

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Defreitas 0.5
S Modgil 0.47
S Lynch 0.32
T Tector 0.21
D Delany 0.13
R Wilson 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
M O Reilly -0.28
G Hoey -0.24

Best NWW Player Combinations

Best NWW Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

High Performing Players

Best LLG Player Combinations

Best LLG Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

High Performing Players

More on PL Labs

NWW vs LLG

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only