Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
MIS 06 Apr 10:00 pm PPS

Lineup Out

Shaw Park
Bago T10 Blast, 3rd Edition

Best Player Combinations For
MIS vs PPS

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

MIS vs PPS

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best MIS Player Combinations

Best MIS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
A Chandler BOW MIS
S Duncan BOW MIS
S Peters BAT MIS
D Melville WK MIS
A Pierre BAT MIS
S Thomas BOW MIS
R Lezama BOW MIS
I Craig BAT MIS
K Dillon BOW MIS
S Rambaran AR MIS
A Clarke WK MIS
A Chandler
S Duncan
S Peters
D Melville
A Pierre
S Thomas
R Lezama
I Craig
K Dillon
S Rambaran
A Clarke
1
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
A Chandler
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
S Duncan
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
S Peters
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
D Melville
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
A Pierre
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
S Thomas
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
R Lezama
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
I Craig
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
K Dillon
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
S Rambaran
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
A Clarke
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
A Chandler
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
S Duncan
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
S Peters
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
D Melville
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
A Pierre
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
S Thomas
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
R Lezama
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
I Craig
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
K Dillon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
S Rambaran
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
A Clarke
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Peters
2 player
A Chandler
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
S Peters
2 player
S Duncan
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Peters
2 player
S Peters
Strong Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
S Peters
2 player
D Melville
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
S Peters
2 player
A Pierre
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
S Peters
2 player
S Thomas
Positive Correlation
0.61
1 player
S Peters
2 player
R Lezama
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Peters
2 player
I Craig
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Peters
2 player
K Dillon
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
S Peters
2 player
S Rambaran
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Peters
2 player
A Clarke
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Melville
2 player
A Chandler
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
D Melville
2 player
S Duncan
Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
D Melville
2 player
S Peters
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Melville
2 player
D Melville
Strong Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
D Melville
2 player
A Pierre
Weak Positive Correlation
0.68
1 player
D Melville
2 player
S Thomas
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
D Melville
2 player
R Lezama
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Melville
2 player
I Craig
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
D Melville
2 player
K Dillon
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
D Melville
2 player
S Rambaran
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Melville
2 player
A Clarke
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
A Chandler
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
S Duncan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
S Peters
Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
D Melville
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
A Pierre
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
S Thomas
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
R Lezama
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
I Craig
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
K Dillon
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
S Rambaran
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
A Clarke
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
A Chandler
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
S Duncan
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
S Peters
Positive Correlation
0.68
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
D Melville
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
A Pierre
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
S Thomas
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
R Lezama
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
I Craig
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
K Dillon
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
S Rambaran
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
A Clarke
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
A Chandler
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
S Duncan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.61
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
S Peters
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
D Melville
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
A Pierre
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
S Thomas
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
R Lezama
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
I Craig
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
K Dillon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
S Rambaran
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
A Clarke
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Craig
2 player
A Chandler
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Craig
2 player
S Duncan
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Craig
2 player
S Peters
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Craig
2 player
D Melville
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Craig
2 player
A Pierre
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Craig
2 player
S Thomas
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Craig
2 player
R Lezama
No Correlation
1
1 player
I Craig
2 player
I Craig
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
I Craig
2 player
K Dillon
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Craig
2 player
S Rambaran
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Craig
2 player
A Clarke
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
A Chandler
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
S Duncan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
S Peters
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
D Melville
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
A Pierre
No Correlation
-0.06
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
S Thomas
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
R Lezama
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
I Craig
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
K Dillon
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
S Rambaran
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
A Clarke
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
A Chandler
No Correlation
0.49
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
S Duncan
Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
S Peters
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
D Melville
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
A Pierre
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
S Thomas
Negative Correlation
0.22
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
R Lezama
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
I Craig
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
K Dillon
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
S Rambaran
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
A Clarke
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
A Chandler
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
S Duncan
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
S Peters
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
D Melville
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
A Pierre
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
S Thomas
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
R Lezama
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
I Craig
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
K Dillon
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
S Rambaran
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
A Clarke
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick S Peters and R Lezama together
Positive Correlation

Pick D Melville and S Thomas together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 S Rambaran

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Duncan 0.49
A Pierre 0.31
R Lezama 0.22
D Melville 0.12
K Dillon 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
S Thomas -0.42
A Clarke -0.4
S Peters -0.17

2 S Duncan

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Rambaran 0.49
D Melville 0.43
R Lezama 0.36
A Pierre 0.28
K Dillon 0.27
S Peters 0.26
S Thomas 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
A Clarke -0.4

3 K Dillon

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Duncan 0.27
R Lezama 0.23
A Pierre 0.17
S Peters 0.11
S Rambaran 0.1
D Melville 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
S Thomas -0.06

4 A Pierre

BAT
Similar Perfomance
S Peters 0.48
S Rambaran 0.31
S Duncan 0.28
R Lezama 0.28
D Melville 0.24
K Dillon 0.17

5 R Lezama

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Peters 0.61
D Melville 0.44
S Duncan 0.36
A Pierre 0.28
K Dillon 0.23
S Rambaran 0.22
S Thomas 0.1

Best PPS Player Combinations

Best PPS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
D Mohammed BOW PPS
A Medina BAT PPS
B Melville BAT PPS
A Alexander BOW PPS
J Kent WK PPS
A Providence AR PPS
D Roberts BOW PPS
Mickel Frederick AR PPS
R Williams BOW PPS
K Tinto AR PPS
D Mohammed
A Medina
B Melville
A Alexander
J Kent
A Providence
D Roberts
Mickel Frederick
R Williams
K Tinto
1
1 player
D Mohammed
2 player
D Mohammed
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Mohammed
2 player
A Medina
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Mohammed
2 player
B Melville
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Mohammed
2 player
A Alexander
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Mohammed
2 player
J Kent
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Mohammed
2 player
A Providence
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Mohammed
2 player
D Roberts
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Mohammed
2 player
Mickel Frederick
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Mohammed
2 player
R Williams
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Mohammed
2 player
K Tinto
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Medina
2 player
D Mohammed
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Medina
2 player
A Medina
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Medina
2 player
B Melville
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Medina
2 player
A Alexander
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Medina
2 player
J Kent
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Medina
2 player
A Providence
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Medina
2 player
D Roberts
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Medina
2 player
Mickel Frederick
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Medina
2 player
R Williams
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Medina
2 player
K Tinto
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Melville
2 player
D Mohammed
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Melville
2 player
A Medina
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Melville
2 player
B Melville
Strong Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
B Melville
2 player
A Alexander
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
B Melville
2 player
J Kent
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
B Melville
2 player
A Providence
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
B Melville
2 player
D Roberts
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Melville
2 player
Mickel Frederick
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
B Melville
2 player
R Williams
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Melville
2 player
K Tinto
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Alexander
2 player
D Mohammed
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Alexander
2 player
A Medina
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
A Alexander
2 player
B Melville
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Alexander
2 player
A Alexander
Strong Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
A Alexander
2 player
J Kent
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
A Alexander
2 player
A Providence
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
A Alexander
2 player
D Roberts
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Alexander
2 player
Mickel Frederick
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
A Alexander
2 player
R Williams
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Alexander
2 player
K Tinto
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Kent
2 player
D Mohammed
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Kent
2 player
A Medina
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
J Kent
2 player
B Melville
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
J Kent
2 player
A Alexander
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Kent
2 player
J Kent
Strong Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
J Kent
2 player
A Providence
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
J Kent
2 player
D Roberts
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Kent
2 player
Mickel Frederick
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
J Kent
2 player
R Williams
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Kent
2 player
K Tinto
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Providence
2 player
D Mohammed
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Providence
2 player
A Medina
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
A Providence
2 player
B Melville
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
A Providence
2 player
A Alexander
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
A Providence
2 player
J Kent
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Providence
2 player
A Providence
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
A Providence
2 player
D Roberts
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Providence
2 player
Mickel Frederick
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Providence
2 player
R Williams
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Providence
2 player
K Tinto
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Roberts
2 player
D Mohammed
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Roberts
2 player
A Medina
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
D Roberts
2 player
B Melville
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
D Roberts
2 player
A Alexander
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
D Roberts
2 player
J Kent
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
D Roberts
2 player
A Providence
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Roberts
2 player
D Roberts
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Roberts
2 player
Mickel Frederick
No Correlation
0.51
1 player
D Roberts
2 player
R Williams
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Roberts
2 player
K Tinto
No Correlation
0
1 player
Mickel Frederick
2 player
D Mohammed
No Correlation
0
1 player
Mickel Frederick
2 player
A Medina
No Correlation
0
1 player
Mickel Frederick
2 player
B Melville
No Correlation
0
1 player
Mickel Frederick
2 player
A Alexander
No Correlation
0
1 player
Mickel Frederick
2 player
J Kent
No Correlation
0
1 player
Mickel Frederick
2 player
A Providence
No Correlation
0
1 player
Mickel Frederick
2 player
D Roberts
No Correlation
1
1 player
Mickel Frederick
2 player
Mickel Frederick
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
Mickel Frederick
2 player
R Williams
No Correlation
0
1 player
Mickel Frederick
2 player
K Tinto
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Williams
2 player
D Mohammed
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Williams
2 player
A Medina
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Williams
2 player
B Melville
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
R Williams
2 player
A Alexander
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
R Williams
2 player
J Kent
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Williams
2 player
A Providence
No Correlation
0.51
1 player
R Williams
2 player
D Roberts
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Williams
2 player
Mickel Frederick
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Williams
2 player
R Williams
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Williams
2 player
K Tinto
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Tinto
2 player
D Mohammed
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Tinto
2 player
A Medina
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Tinto
2 player
B Melville
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Tinto
2 player
A Alexander
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Tinto
2 player
J Kent
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Tinto
2 player
A Providence
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Tinto
2 player
D Roberts
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Tinto
2 player
Mickel Frederick
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Tinto
2 player
R Williams
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Tinto
2 player
K Tinto
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick B Melville and R Williams together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 J Kent

WK
Similar Perfomance
B Melville 0.39
A Providence 0.31
A Alexander 0.29
R Williams 0.11
D Roberts 0.1

2 A Providence

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Alexander 0.39
J Kent 0.31
R Williams 0.14
D Roberts 0.12
B Melville 0.06

3 R Williams

BOW
Similar Perfomance
B Melville 0.7
D Roberts 0.51
A Alexander 0.37
A Providence 0.14
J Kent 0.11

4 D Roberts

BOW
Similar Perfomance
R Williams 0.51
A Alexander 0.43
B Melville 0.39
A Providence 0.12
J Kent 0.1

5 A Alexander

BOW
Similar Perfomance
B Melville 0.45
D Roberts 0.43
A Providence 0.39
R Williams 0.37
J Kent 0.29

Best MIS Player Combinations

Best MIS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
A Chandler BOW MIS
S Duncan BOW MIS
S Peters BAT MIS
D Melville WK MIS
A Pierre BAT MIS
S Thomas BOW MIS
R Lezama BOW MIS
I Craig BAT MIS
K Dillon BOW MIS
S Rambaran AR MIS
A Clarke WK MIS
A Chandler
S Duncan
S Peters
D Melville
A Pierre
S Thomas
R Lezama
I Craig
K Dillon
S Rambaran
A Clarke
1
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
A Chandler
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
S Duncan
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
S Peters
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
D Melville
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
A Pierre
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
S Thomas
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
R Lezama
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
I Craig
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
K Dillon
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
S Rambaran
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Chandler
2 player
A Clarke
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
A Chandler
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
S Duncan
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.64
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
S Peters
Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
D Melville
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
A Pierre
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.56
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
S Thomas
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
R Lezama
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
I Craig
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
K Dillon
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
S Rambaran
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Duncan
2 player
A Clarke
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Peters
2 player
A Chandler
No Correlation
-0.64
1 player
S Peters
2 player
S Duncan
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Peters
2 player
S Peters
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Peters
2 player
D Melville
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
S Peters
2 player
A Pierre
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
S Peters
2 player
S Thomas
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Peters
2 player
R Lezama
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Peters
2 player
I Craig
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
S Peters
2 player
K Dillon
Negative Correlation
-0.78
1 player
S Peters
2 player
S Rambaran
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Peters
2 player
A Clarke
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Melville
2 player
A Chandler
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
D Melville
2 player
S Duncan
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
D Melville
2 player
S Peters
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Melville
2 player
D Melville
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
D Melville
2 player
A Pierre
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
D Melville
2 player
S Thomas
Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
D Melville
2 player
R Lezama
Strong Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Melville
2 player
I Craig
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
D Melville
2 player
K Dillon
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
D Melville
2 player
S Rambaran
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Melville
2 player
A Clarke
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
A Chandler
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
S Duncan
Weak Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
S Peters
Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
D Melville
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
A Pierre
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
S Thomas
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
R Lezama
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
I Craig
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
K Dillon
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
S Rambaran
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Pierre
2 player
A Clarke
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
A Chandler
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
S Duncan
Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
S Peters
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
D Melville
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
A Pierre
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
S Thomas
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
R Lezama
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
I Craig
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
K Dillon
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
S Rambaran
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Thomas
2 player
A Clarke
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
A Chandler
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
S Duncan
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
S Peters
No Correlation
-1
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
D Melville
Strong Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
A Pierre
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
S Thomas
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
R Lezama
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
I Craig
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
K Dillon
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
S Rambaran
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Lezama
2 player
A Clarke
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Craig
2 player
A Chandler
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Craig
2 player
S Duncan
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Craig
2 player
S Peters
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Craig
2 player
D Melville
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Craig
2 player
A Pierre
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Craig
2 player
S Thomas
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Craig
2 player
R Lezama
No Correlation
1
1 player
I Craig
2 player
I Craig
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
I Craig
2 player
K Dillon
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Craig
2 player
S Rambaran
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Craig
2 player
A Clarke
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
A Chandler
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
S Duncan
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
S Peters
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
D Melville
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
A Pierre
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
S Thomas
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
R Lezama
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
I Craig
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
K Dillon
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
S Rambaran
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Dillon
2 player
A Clarke
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
A Chandler
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
S Duncan
No Correlation
-0.78
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
S Peters
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
D Melville
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
A Pierre
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
S Thomas
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
R Lezama
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
I Craig
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
K Dillon
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
S Rambaran
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Rambaran
2 player
A Clarke
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
A Chandler
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
S Duncan
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
S Peters
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
D Melville
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
A Pierre
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
S Thomas
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
R Lezama
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
I Craig
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
K Dillon
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
S Rambaran
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Clarke
2 player
A Clarke
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick R Lezama and K Dillon together
Positive Correlation

Pick S Duncan and S Peters together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Duncan and A Clarke together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Peters and K Dillon together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Peters and S Rambaran together
Negative Correlation

Pick D Melville and R Lezama together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick S Thomas and R Lezama together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Thomas and S Rambaran together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Rambaran and A Clarke together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 S Duncan

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Rambaran 0.17
Opposite Perfomance
A Clarke -0.7
S Peters -0.64
S Thomas -0.56
A Pierre -0.22
R Lezama -0.14
D Melville -0.11
K Dillon -0.1

2 S Rambaran

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Duncan 0.17
R Lezama 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
S Peters -0.78
A Clarke -0.7
S Thomas -0.67
D Melville -0.33
K Dillon -0.2

3 K Dillon

BOW
Similar Perfomance
R Lezama 0.7
Opposite Perfomance
S Peters -0.67
D Melville -0.35
S Thomas -0.33
S Rambaran -0.2
S Duncan -0.1
A Pierre -0.08

4 A Pierre

BAT
Similar Perfomance
S Peters 0.5
R Lezama 0.42
Opposite Perfomance
S Thomas -0.5
D Melville -0.43
S Duncan -0.22
K Dillon -0.08

5 R Lezama

BOW
Similar Perfomance
K Dillon 0.7
A Pierre 0.42
S Rambaran 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
D Melville -1
S Thomas -0.7
S Duncan -0.14
S Peters -0.14

Best PPS Player Combinations

Best PPS Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
D Mohammed BOW PPS
A Medina BAT PPS
B Melville BAT PPS
A Alexander BOW PPS
J Kent WK PPS
A Providence AR PPS
D Roberts BOW PPS
R Williams BOW PPS
K Tinto AR PPS
D Mohammed
A Medina
B Melville
A Alexander
J Kent
A Providence
D Roberts
R Williams
K Tinto
1
1 player
D Mohammed
2 player
D Mohammed
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Mohammed
2 player
A Medina
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Mohammed
2 player
B Melville
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Mohammed
2 player
A Alexander
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Mohammed
2 player
J Kent
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Mohammed
2 player
A Providence
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Mohammed
2 player
D Roberts
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Mohammed
2 player
R Williams
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Mohammed
2 player
K Tinto
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Medina
2 player
D Mohammed
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Medina
2 player
A Medina
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Medina
2 player
B Melville
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Medina
2 player
A Alexander
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Medina
2 player
J Kent
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Medina
2 player
A Providence
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Medina
2 player
D Roberts
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Medina
2 player
R Williams
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Medina
2 player
K Tinto
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Melville
2 player
D Mohammed
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Melville
2 player
A Medina
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Melville
2 player
B Melville
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
B Melville
2 player
A Alexander
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Melville
2 player
J Kent
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Melville
2 player
A Providence
Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
B Melville
2 player
D Roberts
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B Melville
2 player
R Williams
No Correlation
0
1 player
B Melville
2 player
K Tinto
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Alexander
2 player
D Mohammed
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Alexander
2 player
A Medina
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
A Alexander
2 player
B Melville
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Alexander
2 player
A Alexander
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
A Alexander
2 player
J Kent
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Alexander
2 player
A Providence
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Alexander
2 player
D Roberts
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
A Alexander
2 player
R Williams
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Alexander
2 player
K Tinto
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Kent
2 player
D Mohammed
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Kent
2 player
A Medina
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Kent
2 player
B Melville
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
J Kent
2 player
A Alexander
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Kent
2 player
J Kent
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Kent
2 player
A Providence
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.54
1 player
J Kent
2 player
D Roberts
Negative Correlation
-0.6
1 player
J Kent
2 player
R Williams
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Kent
2 player
K Tinto
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Providence
2 player
D Mohammed
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Providence
2 player
A Medina
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Providence
2 player
B Melville
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Providence
2 player
A Alexander
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Providence
2 player
J Kent
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Providence
2 player
A Providence
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Providence
2 player
D Roberts
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Providence
2 player
R Williams
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Providence
2 player
K Tinto
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Roberts
2 player
D Mohammed
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Roberts
2 player
A Medina
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
D Roberts
2 player
B Melville
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Roberts
2 player
A Alexander
No Correlation
-0.54
1 player
D Roberts
2 player
J Kent
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Roberts
2 player
A Providence
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Roberts
2 player
D Roberts
Strong Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
D Roberts
2 player
R Williams
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Roberts
2 player
K Tinto
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Williams
2 player
D Mohammed
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Williams
2 player
A Medina
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Williams
2 player
B Melville
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
R Williams
2 player
A Alexander
No Correlation
-0.6
1 player
R Williams
2 player
J Kent
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
R Williams
2 player
A Providence
Weak Negative Correlation
0.45
1 player
R Williams
2 player
D Roberts
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Williams
2 player
R Williams
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Williams
2 player
K Tinto
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Tinto
2 player
D Mohammed
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Tinto
2 player
A Medina
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Tinto
2 player
B Melville
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Tinto
2 player
A Alexander
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Tinto
2 player
J Kent
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Tinto
2 player
A Providence
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Tinto
2 player
D Roberts
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Tinto
2 player
R Williams
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Tinto
2 player
K Tinto
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Pick B Melville and A Providence together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Kent and R Williams together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 J Kent

WK
Similar Perfomance
A Providence 0.2
B Melville 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
R Williams -0.6
D Roberts -0.54
A Alexander -0.22

2 D Roberts

BOW
Similar Perfomance
R Williams 0.45
Opposite Perfomance
J Kent -0.54
B Melville -0.42

3 A Providence

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Kent 0.2
Opposite Perfomance
B Melville -0.7
R Williams -0.25

4 R Williams

BOW
Similar Perfomance
D Roberts 0.45
Opposite Perfomance
J Kent -0.6
A Providence -0.25
A Alexander -0.09

More on PL Labs

MIS vs PPS

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only