Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
HEA 01 Jan 01:45 pm STA

Lineup Out

The Gabba
Australian T20 League

Best Player Combinations For
HEA vs STA

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

HEA vs STA

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best HEA Player Combinations

Best HEA Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
M Kuhnemann BOW HEA
M Swepson BOW HEA
M Renshaw AR HEA
M Bryant BAT HEA
W Prestwidge BOW HEA
C Munro BAT HEA
T Banton WK HEA
X Bartlett BOW HEA
S Johnson BOW HEA
N McSweeney BAT HEA
P Walter AR HEA
M Kuhnemann
M Swepson
M Renshaw
M Bryant
W Prestwidge
C Munro
T Banton
X Bartlett
S Johnson
N McSweeney
P Walter
1
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
M Kuhnemann
Strong Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
M Swepson
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
M Renshaw
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
M Bryant
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
W Prestwidge
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
C Munro
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
T Banton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
X Bartlett
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
S Johnson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
N McSweeney
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
0.41
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
M Kuhnemann
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
M Swepson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
M Renshaw
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
M Bryant
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
W Prestwidge
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
C Munro
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
T Banton
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
X Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
S Johnson
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
N McSweeney
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
M Kuhnemann
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
M Swepson
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
M Renshaw
Strong Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
M Bryant
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
W Prestwidge
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
C Munro
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
T Banton
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
X Bartlett
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
S Johnson
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
N McSweeney
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
M Kuhnemann
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
M Swepson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
M Renshaw
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
M Bryant
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
W Prestwidge
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
C Munro
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
T Banton
Weak Negative Correlation
0.32
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
X Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
S Johnson
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
N McSweeney
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
M Kuhnemann
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
M Swepson
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
M Renshaw
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
M Bryant
No Correlation
1
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
W Prestwidge
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
C Munro
No Correlation
0
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
T Banton
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
X Bartlett
No Correlation
0
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
S Johnson
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
N McSweeney
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
P Walter
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Munro
2 player
M Kuhnemann
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
C Munro
2 player
M Swepson
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
C Munro
2 player
M Renshaw
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
C Munro
2 player
M Bryant
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Munro
2 player
W Prestwidge
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Munro
2 player
C Munro
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Munro
2 player
T Banton
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Munro
2 player
X Bartlett
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
C Munro
2 player
S Johnson
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Munro
2 player
N McSweeney
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Munro
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
T Banton
2 player
M Kuhnemann
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Banton
2 player
M Swepson
Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
T Banton
2 player
M Renshaw
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
T Banton
2 player
M Bryant
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Banton
2 player
W Prestwidge
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Banton
2 player
C Munro
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Banton
2 player
T Banton
Strong Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
T Banton
2 player
X Bartlett
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
T Banton
2 player
S Johnson
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Banton
2 player
N McSweeney
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
T Banton
2 player
P Walter
Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
M Kuhnemann
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
M Swepson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
M Renshaw
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
M Bryant
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
W Prestwidge
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
C Munro
No Correlation
0.85
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
T Banton
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
X Bartlett
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
S Johnson
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
N McSweeney
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
P Walter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
M Kuhnemann
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
M Swepson
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
M Renshaw
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
M Bryant
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
W Prestwidge
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
C Munro
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
T Banton
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
X Bartlett
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
S Johnson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
N McSweeney
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
M Kuhnemann
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
M Swepson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
M Renshaw
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
M Bryant
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
W Prestwidge
Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
C Munro
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
T Banton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
X Bartlett
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
S Johnson
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
N McSweeney
Strong Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
P Walter
2 player
M Kuhnemann
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
P Walter
2 player
M Swepson
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
P Walter
2 player
M Renshaw
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
P Walter
2 player
M Bryant
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
P Walter
2 player
W Prestwidge
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
P Walter
2 player
C Munro
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
P Walter
2 player
T Banton
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
P Walter
2 player
X Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
P Walter
2 player
S Johnson
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
P Walter
2 player
N McSweeney
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Walter
2 player
P Walter
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick M Swepson and T Banton together
Positive Correlation

Pick W Prestwidge and P Walter together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Munro and T Banton together
Positive Correlation

Pick T Banton and X Bartlett together
Strong Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 S Johnson

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Kuhnemann 0.26
N McSweeney 0.22
M Renshaw 0.18
M Swepson 0.11
P Walter 0.11
M Bryant 0.01
Opposite Perfomance
T Banton -0.5
C Munro -0.08

2 X Bartlett

BOW
Similar Perfomance
T Banton 0.85
P Walter 0.39
M Bryant 0.32
M Swepson 0.23
N McSweeney 0.16
W Prestwidge 0.15
C Munro 0.14
M Renshaw 0.09
M Kuhnemann 0.04

3 M Renshaw

AR
Similar Perfomance
W Prestwidge 0.55
M Bryant 0.39
S Johnson 0.18
N McSweeney 0.18
P Walter 0.17
X Bartlett 0.09
M Kuhnemann 0.08
M Swepson 0.07
C Munro 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
T Banton -0.15

4 M Kuhnemann

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Swepson 0.41
M Bryant 0.31
S Johnson 0.26
T Banton 0.2
N McSweeney 0.2
W Prestwidge 0.15
C Munro 0.11
M Renshaw 0.08
P Walter 0.05
X Bartlett 0.04

5 N McSweeney

BAT
Similar Perfomance
W Prestwidge 0.4
T Banton 0.35
M Swepson 0.29
S Johnson 0.22
M Kuhnemann 0.2
M Renshaw 0.18
X Bartlett 0.16
P Walter 0.16
M Bryant 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
C Munro -0.09

Best STA Player Combinations

Best STA Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
H Cartwright BAT STA
M Stoinis AR STA
J Paris BOW STA
M Steketee BOW STA
S Harper WK STA
T Fraser Rogers BAT STA
G Maxwell AR STA
U Mir BOW STA
D Lawrence AR STA
B Duckett BAT STA
P Siddle BOW STA
H Cartwright
M Stoinis
J Paris
M Steketee
S Harper
T Fraser Rogers
G Maxwell
U Mir
D Lawrence
B Duckett
P Siddle
1
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
H Cartwright
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
M Stoinis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
J Paris
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
M Steketee
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
S Harper
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
G Maxwell
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
U Mir
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
D Lawrence
Weak Negative Correlation
0.1
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
B Duckett
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
P Siddle
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
H Cartwright
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
M Stoinis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
J Paris
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
M Steketee
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
S Harper
Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
G Maxwell
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
U Mir
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
D Lawrence
Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
B Duckett
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
P Siddle
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
J Paris
2 player
H Cartwright
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
J Paris
2 player
M Stoinis
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Paris
2 player
J Paris
Strong Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
J Paris
2 player
M Steketee
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
J Paris
2 player
S Harper
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
J Paris
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
J Paris
2 player
G Maxwell
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
J Paris
2 player
U Mir
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Paris
2 player
D Lawrence
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Paris
2 player
B Duckett
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Paris
2 player
P Siddle
Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
H Cartwright
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
M Stoinis
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
J Paris
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
M Steketee
Strong Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
S Harper
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
G Maxwell
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
U Mir
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
D Lawrence
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
B Duckett
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
P Siddle
Strong Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
S Harper
2 player
H Cartwright
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
S Harper
2 player
M Stoinis
Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
S Harper
2 player
J Paris
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
S Harper
2 player
M Steketee
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Harper
2 player
S Harper
Strong Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
S Harper
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
No Correlation
-0.19
1 player
S Harper
2 player
G Maxwell
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
S Harper
2 player
U Mir
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Harper
2 player
D Lawrence
Negative Correlation
-0.6
1 player
S Harper
2 player
B Duckett
Negative Correlation
0.26
1 player
S Harper
2 player
P Siddle
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
H Cartwright
Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
M Stoinis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
J Paris
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
M Steketee
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
S Harper
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
G Maxwell
No Correlation
0.52
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
U Mir
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
D Lawrence
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
B Duckett
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
P Siddle
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
H Cartwright
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
M Stoinis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
J Paris
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
M Steketee
Negative Correlation
-0.19
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
S Harper
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
G Maxwell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
U Mir
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
D Lawrence
Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
B Duckett
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
P Siddle
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
U Mir
2 player
H Cartwright
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
U Mir
2 player
M Stoinis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
U Mir
2 player
J Paris
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
U Mir
2 player
M Steketee
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
U Mir
2 player
S Harper
Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
U Mir
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
U Mir
2 player
G Maxwell
No Correlation
1
1 player
U Mir
2 player
U Mir
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
U Mir
2 player
D Lawrence
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
U Mir
2 player
B Duckett
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
U Mir
2 player
P Siddle
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
H Cartwright
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
M Stoinis
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
J Paris
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
M Steketee
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
S Harper
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
G Maxwell
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
U Mir
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
D Lawrence
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
B Duckett
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
P Siddle
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
H Cartwright
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
M Stoinis
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
J Paris
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
M Steketee
No Correlation
-0.6
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
S Harper
Negative Correlation
0.3
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
G Maxwell
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
U Mir
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
D Lawrence
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
B Duckett
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
P Siddle
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
H Cartwright
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
M Stoinis
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
J Paris
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
M Steketee
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
S Harper
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
G Maxwell
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
U Mir
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
D Lawrence
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
B Duckett
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
P Siddle
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick J Paris and P Siddle together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Steketee and P Siddle together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick G Maxwell and D Lawrence together
Positive Correlation

Don’t pick S Harper and D Lawrence in the same lineup
Negative Correlation

Don’t pick S Harper and B Duckett in the same lineup
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 G Maxwell

AR
Similar Perfomance
D Lawrence 0.6
M Stoinis 0.25
T Fraser Rogers 0.18
P Siddle 0.18
H Cartwright 0.17
J Paris 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
M Steketee -0.43
S Harper -0.19
U Mir -0.18
B Duckett -0.13

2 H Cartwright

BAT
Similar Perfomance
T Fraser Rogers 0.45
M Stoinis 0.25
U Mir 0.2
P Siddle 0.2
S Harper 0.19
G Maxwell 0.17
J Paris 0.13
B Duckett 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
D Lawrence -0.28
M Steketee -0.03

3 M Stoinis

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Harper 0.47
D Lawrence 0.42
U Mir 0.34
T Fraser Rogers 0.31
J Paris 0.3
H Cartwright 0.25
G Maxwell 0.25
Opposite Perfomance
M Steketee -0.13
B Duckett -0.13
P Siddle -0.05

4 T Fraser Rogers

BAT
Similar Perfomance
U Mir 0.52
M Steketee 0.5
J Paris 0.47
H Cartwright 0.45
M Stoinis 0.31
B Duckett 0.3
G Maxwell 0.18
S Harper 0.06

5 S Harper

WK
Similar Perfomance
M Stoinis 0.47
U Mir 0.44
M Steketee 0.43
P Siddle 0.26
H Cartwright 0.19
T Fraser Rogers 0.06
J Paris 0.01
Opposite Perfomance
D Lawrence -0.7
B Duckett -0.6
G Maxwell -0.19

Best HEA Player Combinations

Best HEA Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
M Kuhnemann BOW HEA
M Swepson BOW HEA
M Renshaw AR HEA
M Bryant BAT HEA
W Prestwidge BOW HEA
C Munro BAT HEA
T Banton WK HEA
X Bartlett BOW HEA
S Johnson BOW HEA
N McSweeney BAT HEA
P Walter AR HEA
M Kuhnemann
M Swepson
M Renshaw
M Bryant
W Prestwidge
C Munro
T Banton
X Bartlett
S Johnson
N McSweeney
P Walter
1
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
M Kuhnemann
Strong Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
M Swepson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.39
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
M Renshaw
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
M Bryant
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
W Prestwidge
Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
C Munro
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
T Banton
Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
X Bartlett
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
S Johnson
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
N McSweeney
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Kuhnemann
2 player
P Walter
Weak Negative Correlation
0.36
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
M Kuhnemann
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
M Swepson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.26
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
M Renshaw
Weak Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
M Bryant
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
W Prestwidge
Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
C Munro
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
T Banton
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
X Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
S Johnson
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
N McSweeney
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Swepson
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
-0.39
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
M Kuhnemann
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.26
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
M Swepson
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
M Renshaw
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
M Bryant
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
W Prestwidge
Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
C Munro
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
T Banton
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
X Bartlett
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
S Johnson
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
N McSweeney
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Renshaw
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
M Kuhnemann
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
M Swepson
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
M Renshaw
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
M Bryant
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
W Prestwidge
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
C Munro
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
T Banton
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
X Bartlett
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
S Johnson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
N McSweeney
No Correlation
-1
1 player
M Bryant
2 player
P Walter
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
M Kuhnemann
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
M Swepson
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
M Renshaw
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
M Bryant
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
W Prestwidge
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
C Munro
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
T Banton
No Correlation
0
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
X Bartlett
No Correlation
0
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
S Johnson
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
N McSweeney
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
W Prestwidge
2 player
P Walter
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Munro
2 player
M Kuhnemann
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Munro
2 player
M Swepson
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Munro
2 player
M Renshaw
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
C Munro
2 player
M Bryant
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Munro
2 player
W Prestwidge
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
C Munro
2 player
C Munro
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Munro
2 player
T Banton
Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Munro
2 player
X Bartlett
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
C Munro
2 player
S Johnson
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
C Munro
2 player
N McSweeney
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Munro
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Banton
2 player
M Kuhnemann
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Banton
2 player
M Swepson
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Banton
2 player
M Renshaw
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Banton
2 player
M Bryant
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Banton
2 player
W Prestwidge
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Banton
2 player
C Munro
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Banton
2 player
T Banton
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Banton
2 player
X Bartlett
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Banton
2 player
S Johnson
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Banton
2 player
N McSweeney
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Banton
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
M Kuhnemann
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
M Swepson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
M Renshaw
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
M Bryant
No Correlation
0
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
W Prestwidge
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
C Munro
No Correlation
0
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
T Banton
No Correlation
1
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
X Bartlett
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.41
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
S Johnson
Negative Correlation
-0.29
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
N McSweeney
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
X Bartlett
2 player
P Walter
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
M Kuhnemann
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
M Swepson
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
M Renshaw
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
M Bryant
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
W Prestwidge
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
C Munro
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
T Banton
No Correlation
-0.41
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
X Bartlett
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
S Johnson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
N McSweeney
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
S Johnson
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
M Kuhnemann
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
M Swepson
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
M Renshaw
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
M Bryant
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
W Prestwidge
Positive Correlation
-0.45
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
C Munro
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
T Banton
Negative Correlation
-0.29
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
X Bartlett
Weak Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
S Johnson
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
N McSweeney
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
N McSweeney
2 player
P Walter
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
P Walter
2 player
M Kuhnemann
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
P Walter
2 player
M Swepson
No Correlation
0
1 player
P Walter
2 player
M Renshaw
No Correlation
-1
1 player
P Walter
2 player
M Bryant
Strong Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
P Walter
2 player
W Prestwidge
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
P Walter
2 player
C Munro
No Correlation
0
1 player
P Walter
2 player
T Banton
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
P Walter
2 player
X Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
P Walter
2 player
S Johnson
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
P Walter
2 player
N McSweeney
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Walter
2 player
P Walter
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick M Kuhnemann and T Banton together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Renshaw and W Prestwidge together
Positive Correlation

Pick W Prestwidge and N McSweeney together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Kuhnemann and W Prestwidge together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Swepson and W Prestwidge together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Bryant and W Prestwidge together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Bryant and P Walter together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick W Prestwidge and C Munro together
Negative Correlation

Pick T Banton and N McSweeney together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 X Bartlett

BOW
Similar Perfomance
P Walter 0.33
M Swepson 0.29
Opposite Perfomance
S Johnson -0.41
N McSweeney -0.29
M Renshaw -0.18
M Kuhnemann -0.1
C Munro -0.09
M Bryant -0.08

2 M Kuhnemann

BOW
Similar Perfomance
T Banton 0.7
M Swepson 0.36
C Munro 0.2
Opposite Perfomance
W Prestwidge -0.7
M Renshaw -0.39
P Walter -0.33
N McSweeney -0.18
X Bartlett -0.1
M Bryant -0.07
S Johnson -0.05

3 M Renshaw

AR
Similar Perfomance
W Prestwidge 0.7
N McSweeney 0.17
S Johnson 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
M Kuhnemann -0.39
M Swepson -0.26
X Bartlett -0.18
M Bryant -0.09
C Munro -0.09

4 P Walter

AR
Similar Perfomance
W Prestwidge 0.7
X Bartlett 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
M Bryant -1
M Kuhnemann -0.33
N McSweeney -0.17
S Johnson -0.08

5 N McSweeney

BAT
Similar Perfomance
W Prestwidge 0.7
S Johnson 0.38
M Renshaw 0.17
Opposite Perfomance
T Banton -0.7
C Munro -0.45
X Bartlett -0.29
M Bryant -0.2
M Kuhnemann -0.18
P Walter -0.17
M Swepson -0.14

Best STA Player Combinations

Best STA Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
H Cartwright BAT STA
M Stoinis AR STA
J Paris BOW STA
M Steketee BOW STA
S Harper WK STA
T Fraser Rogers BAT STA
G Maxwell AR STA
U Mir BOW STA
D Lawrence AR STA
B Duckett BAT STA
P Siddle BOW STA
H Cartwright
M Stoinis
J Paris
M Steketee
S Harper
T Fraser Rogers
G Maxwell
U Mir
D Lawrence
B Duckett
P Siddle
1
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
H Cartwright
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
M Stoinis
No Correlation
-0.64
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
J Paris
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
M Steketee
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
S Harper
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
G Maxwell
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
U Mir
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
D Lawrence
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
B Duckett
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
H Cartwright
2 player
P Siddle
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
H Cartwright
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
M Stoinis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
J Paris
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
M Steketee
Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
S Harper
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
G Maxwell
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
U Mir
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
D Lawrence
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
B Duckett
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Stoinis
2 player
P Siddle
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.64
1 player
J Paris
2 player
H Cartwright
Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Paris
2 player
M Stoinis
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Paris
2 player
J Paris
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Paris
2 player
M Steketee
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Paris
2 player
S Harper
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Paris
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
J Paris
2 player
G Maxwell
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
J Paris
2 player
U Mir
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Paris
2 player
D Lawrence
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Paris
2 player
B Duckett
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Paris
2 player
P Siddle
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
H Cartwright
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
M Stoinis
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
J Paris
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
M Steketee
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
S Harper
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
G Maxwell
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
U Mir
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
D Lawrence
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
B Duckett
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Steketee
2 player
P Siddle
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Harper
2 player
H Cartwright
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
S Harper
2 player
M Stoinis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Harper
2 player
J Paris
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Harper
2 player
M Steketee
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Harper
2 player
S Harper
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Harper
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
S Harper
2 player
G Maxwell
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Harper
2 player
U Mir
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Harper
2 player
D Lawrence
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Harper
2 player
B Duckett
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Harper
2 player
P Siddle
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
H Cartwright
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
M Stoinis
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
J Paris
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
M Steketee
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
S Harper
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
G Maxwell
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
U Mir
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
D Lawrence
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
B Duckett
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Fraser Rogers
2 player
P Siddle
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
H Cartwright
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
M Stoinis
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
J Paris
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
M Steketee
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
S Harper
Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
G Maxwell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
U Mir
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
D Lawrence
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
B Duckett
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
G Maxwell
2 player
P Siddle
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
U Mir
2 player
H Cartwright
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
U Mir
2 player
M Stoinis
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
U Mir
2 player
J Paris
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
U Mir
2 player
M Steketee
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
U Mir
2 player
S Harper
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
U Mir
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
U Mir
2 player
G Maxwell
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
U Mir
2 player
U Mir
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
U Mir
2 player
D Lawrence
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
U Mir
2 player
B Duckett
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
U Mir
2 player
P Siddle
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
H Cartwright
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
M Stoinis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
J Paris
No Correlation
0
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
M Steketee
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
S Harper
Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
G Maxwell
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
U Mir
No Correlation
1
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
D Lawrence
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
B Duckett
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
D Lawrence
2 player
P Siddle
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
H Cartwright
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
M Stoinis
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
J Paris
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
M Steketee
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
S Harper
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
G Maxwell
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
U Mir
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
D Lawrence
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
B Duckett
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
B Duckett
2 player
P Siddle
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
H Cartwright
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
M Stoinis
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
J Paris
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
M Steketee
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
S Harper
No Correlation
0
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
T Fraser Rogers
No Correlation
0
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
G Maxwell
No Correlation
0
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
U Mir
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
D Lawrence
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
B Duckett
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
P Siddle
2 player
P Siddle
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick M Steketee and T Fraser Rogers together
Positive Correlation

Pick U Mir and B Duckett together
Positive Correlation

Pick D Lawrence and P Siddle together
Positive Correlation

Pick H Cartwright and J Paris together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Stoinis and M Steketee together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Stoinis and B Duckett together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Paris and B Duckett together
Negative Correlation

Pick G Maxwell and U Mir together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 H Cartwright

BAT
Similar Perfomance
T Fraser Rogers 0.07
M Stoinis 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
J Paris -0.64
D Lawrence -0.42
B Duckett -0.23
U Mir -0.14
P Siddle -0.14
G Maxwell -0.08

2 T Fraser Rogers

BAT
Similar Perfomance
M Steketee 0.7
J Paris 0.4
S Harper 0.08
H Cartwright 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
D Lawrence -0.42
U Mir -0.33
G Maxwell -0.27
M Stoinis -0.04

3 G Maxwell

AR
Similar Perfomance
D Lawrence 0.42
M Stoinis 0.17
J Paris 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
U Mir -0.67
S Harper -0.56
T Fraser Rogers -0.27
B Duckett -0.23
H Cartwright -0.08

4 M Stoinis

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Harper 0.38
D Lawrence 0.35
J Paris 0.2
G Maxwell 0.17
H Cartwright 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
M Steketee -0.7
B Duckett -0.7
P Siddle -0.33
U Mir -0.14
T Fraser Rogers -0.04

5 S Harper

WK
Similar Perfomance
M Stoinis 0.38
U Mir 0.14
P Siddle 0.14
T Fraser Rogers 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
D Lawrence -0.7
B Duckett -0.7
G Maxwell -0.56
J Paris -0.14

More on PL Labs

HEA vs STA

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only