NOI-W 02 Mar 06:30 am SOI-W

Lineup Out

McLean Park
New Zealand Womens Domestic T20

Best Player Combinations For
NOI-W vs SOI-W

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best NOI-W Player Combinations

Best NOI-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
I Gaze WK NOI-W
M Downes AR NOI-W
F Devonshire AR NOI-W
M Greig BAT NOI-W
S Shahri BAT NOI-W
N Patel AR NOI-W
G Plimmer BAT NOI-W
M Penfold BOW NOI-W
L Kasperek AR NOI-W
J Penfold BOW NOI-W
P Catton BAT NOI-W
I Gaze
M Downes
F Devonshire
M Greig
S Shahri
N Patel
G Plimmer
M Penfold
L Kasperek
J Penfold
P Catton
1
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
I Gaze
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
M Downes
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
M Greig
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.8
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
S Shahri
Negative Correlation
0.47
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
N Patel
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
G Plimmer
Negative Correlation
0.55
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
M Penfold
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
L Kasperek
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Downes
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Downes
2 player
M Downes
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.57
1 player
M Downes
2 player
F Devonshire
Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
M Downes
2 player
M Greig
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.13
1 player
M Downes
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Downes
2 player
N Patel
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
M Downes
2 player
G Plimmer
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Downes
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
M Downes
2 player
L Kasperek
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
M Downes
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Downes
2 player
P Catton
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.57
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
M Downes
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
F Devonshire
Strong Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
M Greig
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
N Patel
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.3
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
G Plimmer
Weak Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
M Penfold
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
L Kasperek
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
J Penfold
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
P Catton
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
M Greig
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
M Greig
2 player
M Downes
Weak Negative Correlation
0.47
1 player
M Greig
2 player
F Devonshire
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Greig
2 player
M Greig
Strong Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
M Greig
2 player
S Shahri
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
M Greig
2 player
N Patel
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Greig
2 player
G Plimmer
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
M Greig
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
M Greig
2 player
L Kasperek
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
M Greig
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
M Greig
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
-0.8
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
I Gaze
Negative Correlation
-0.13
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
M Downes
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
M Greig
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
S Shahri
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
N Patel
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
G Plimmer
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.85
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
M Penfold
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.13
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
L Kasperek
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
N Patel
2 player
I Gaze
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
N Patel
2 player
M Downes
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
N Patel
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
N Patel
2 player
M Greig
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.27
1 player
N Patel
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
N Patel
2 player
N Patel
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
N Patel
2 player
G Plimmer
Weak Negative Correlation
0.55
1 player
N Patel
2 player
M Penfold
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Patel
2 player
L Kasperek
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
N Patel
2 player
J Penfold
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
N Patel
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
I Gaze
Negative Correlation
0.15
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
M Downes
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
M Greig
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
S Shahri
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
N Patel
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
G Plimmer
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.85
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
M Penfold
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.55
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
L Kasperek
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
J Penfold
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
I Gaze
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
M Downes
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
F Devonshire
Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
-0.85
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
S Shahri
Strong Negative Correlation
0.55
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
N Patel
Positive Correlation
-0.85
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
G Plimmer
Strong Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
M Penfold
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
L Kasperek
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
J Penfold
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
M Downes
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
F Devonshire
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
M Greig
Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
N Patel
Positive Correlation
-0.55
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
G Plimmer
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
M Penfold
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
L Kasperek
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
J Penfold
Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
M Downes
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
F Devonshire
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
N Patel
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
G Plimmer
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
M Penfold
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
L Kasperek
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
J Penfold
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
P Catton
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
P Catton
2 player
M Downes
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
P Catton
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Negative Correlation
0.13
1 player
P Catton
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
0
1 player
P Catton
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
P Catton
2 player
N Patel
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
P Catton
2 player
G Plimmer
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
P Catton
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
P Catton
2 player
L Kasperek
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
P Catton
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Catton
2 player
P Catton
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick M Downes and P Catton together
Positive Correlation

Pick F Devonshire and L Kasperek together
Positive Correlation

Pick S Shahri and G Plimmer together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick N Patel and L Kasperek together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Penfold and L Kasperek together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Penfold and J Penfold together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick L Kasperek and J Penfold together
Positive Correlation

Don’t Pick I Gaze and S Shahri together
Negative Correlation

Don’t Pick I Gaze and G Plimmer together
Negative Correlation

Don’t Pick S Shahri and M Penfold together
Strong Negative Correlation

Don’t Pick G Plimmer and M Penfold together
Strong Negative Correlation

Don’t Pick G Plimmer and J Penfold together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 F Devonshire

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Kasperek 0.6
M Penfold 0.5
J Penfold 0.5
M Greig 0.47
N Patel 0.27
S Shahri 0.13
Opposite Perfomance
M Downes -0.57
I Gaze -0.33
G Plimmer -0.3
P Catton -0.23

2 M Penfold

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Penfold 1
L Kasperek 0.7
I Gaze 0.55
N Patel 0.55
F Devonshire 0.5
Opposite Perfomance
G Plimmer -0.85
S Shahri -0.85
M Greig -0.2
P Catton -0.15

3 L Kasperek

AR
Similar Perfomance
N Patel 0.7
M Penfold 0.7
J Penfold 0.7
F Devonshire 0.6
M Greig 0.47
I Gaze 0.13
Opposite Perfomance
G Plimmer -0.55
M Downes -0.13
S Shahri -0.13
P Catton -0.03

4 J Penfold

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Penfold 1
L Kasperek 0.7
F Devonshire 0.5
N Patel 0.35
M Downes 0.15
M Greig 0.15
S Shahri 0.15
Opposite Perfomance
G Plimmer -0.7
I Gaze -0.15
P Catton -0.15

5 N Patel

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Kasperek 0.7
M Penfold 0.55
I Gaze 0.47
M Greig 0.37
P Catton 0.37
J Penfold 0.35
F Devonshire 0.27
M Downes 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
G Plimmer -0.4
S Shahri -0.27

Best SOI-W Player Combinations

Best SOI-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
S Asmussen BOW SOI-W
J Simmons BOW SOI-W
G Sullivan BOW SOI-W
C Green BOW SOI-W
B James BAT SOI-W
C Blakely BAT SOI-W
H Jensen BOW SOI-W
K Anderson AR SOI-W
F Leydon-Davis AR SOI-W
O Gain BAT SOI-W
P Inglis WK SOI-W
S Asmussen
J Simmons
G Sullivan
C Green
B James
C Blakely
H Jensen
K Anderson
F Leydon-Davis
O Gain
P Inglis
1
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
S Asmussen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
J Simmons
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
G Sullivan
Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
C Green
Negative Correlation
0.13
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
C Blakely
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
K Anderson
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
S Asmussen
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
J Simmons
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
G Sullivan
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
K Anderson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
S Asmussen
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
J Simmons
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
G Sullivan
Strong Positive Correlation
0.85
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
C Green
Strong Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
B James
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
K Anderson
Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
-1
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
O Gain
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.15
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
C Green
2 player
S Asmussen
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Green
2 player
J Simmons
No Correlation
0.85
1 player
C Green
2 player
G Sullivan
Strong Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Green
2 player
C Green
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
C Green
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
C Green
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Green
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Green
2 player
K Anderson
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Green
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
-1
1 player
C Green
2 player
O Gain
Strong Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Green
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
B James
2 player
S Asmussen
No Correlation
0
1 player
B James
2 player
J Simmons
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
B James
2 player
G Sullivan
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
B James
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B James
2 player
B James
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
B James
2 player
C Blakely
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
B James
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
B James
2 player
K Anderson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
B James
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
B James
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
B James
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
S Asmussen
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
J Simmons
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
G Sullivan
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.15
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
B James
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
C Blakely
Strong Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
K Anderson
No Correlation
0.9
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
S Asmussen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
J Simmons
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
G Sullivan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
B James
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
C Blakely
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
H Jensen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
K Anderson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
S Asmussen
No Correlation
0.85
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
J Simmons
Strong Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
G Sullivan
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
C Green
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
K Anderson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
O Gain
Weak Negative Correlation
0.47
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
S Asmussen
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
J Simmons
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
G Sullivan
No Correlation
0
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
B James
Positive Correlation
0.9
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
C Blakely
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
K Anderson
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
O Gain
2 player
S Asmussen
Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
O Gain
2 player
J Simmons
No Correlation
-1
1 player
O Gain
2 player
G Sullivan
Strong Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
O Gain
2 player
C Green
Strong Negative Correlation
0.55
1 player
O Gain
2 player
B James
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
O Gain
2 player
C Blakely
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
O Gain
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
O Gain
2 player
K Anderson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.55
1 player
O Gain
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
O Gain
2 player
O Gain
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
O Gain
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
S Asmussen
Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
J Simmons
Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
G Sullivan
No Correlation
0
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
C Blakely
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
K Anderson
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
P Inglis
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick S Asmussen and C Blakely together
Positive Correlation

Pick S Asmussen and F Leydon-Davis together
Positive Correlation

Pick S Asmussen and O Gain together
Positive Correlation

Pick S Asmussen and P Inglis together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Simmons and K Anderson together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick G Sullivan and C Green together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick C Green and K Anderson together
Positive Correlation

Pick B James and H Jensen together
Positive Correlation

Pick B James and F Leydon-Davis together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Blakely and H Jensen together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Blakely and F Leydon-Davis together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick C Blakely and O Gain together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Blakely and P Inglis together
Positive Correlation

Pick H Jensen and F Leydon-Davis together
Positive Correlation

Pick F Leydon-Davis and P Inglis together
Positive Correlation

Don’t pick S Asmussen and G Sullivan in the same lineup
Negative Correlation

Don’t pick G Sullivan and O Gain in the same lineup
Strong Negative Correlation

Don’t pick C Green and O Gain in the same lineup
Strong Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 C Green

BOW
Similar Perfomance
G Sullivan 0.85
K Anderson 0.7
H Jensen 0.35
B James 0.3
Opposite Perfomance
O Gain -1
S Asmussen -0.5
C Blakely -0.15

2 K Anderson

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Simmons 0.85
C Green 0.7
G Sullivan 0.55
P Inglis 0.47
H Jensen 0.33
F Leydon-Davis 0.27
B James 0.23
C Blakely 0.13
Opposite Perfomance
O Gain -0.4

3 G Sullivan

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C Green 0.85
K Anderson 0.55
H Jensen 0.2
B James 0.15
Opposite Perfomance
O Gain -1
S Asmussen -0.7
C Blakely -0.35
F Leydon-Davis -0.2
P Inglis -0.15

4 J Simmons

BOW
Similar Perfomance
K Anderson 0.85
P Inglis 0.55
F Leydon-Davis 0.35
H Jensen 0.3
S Asmussen 0.2
C Blakely 0.2
Opposite Perfomance
O Gain -0.2

5 H Jensen

BOW
Similar Perfomance
B James 0.7
F Leydon-Davis 0.7
C Blakely 0.6
O Gain 0.5
P Inglis 0.47
C Green 0.35
K Anderson 0.33
J Simmons 0.3
S Asmussen 0.27
G Sullivan 0.2

Best NOI-W Player Combinations

Best NOI-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
I Gaze WK NOI-W
M Downes AR NOI-W
F Devonshire AR NOI-W
M Greig BAT NOI-W
S Shahri BAT NOI-W
N Patel AR NOI-W
G Plimmer BAT NOI-W
M Penfold BOW NOI-W
L Kasperek AR NOI-W
J Penfold BOW NOI-W
P Catton BAT NOI-W
I Gaze
M Downes
F Devonshire
M Greig
S Shahri
N Patel
G Plimmer
M Penfold
L Kasperek
J Penfold
P Catton
1
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
I Gaze
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
M Downes
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
M Greig
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
S Shahri
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
N Patel
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
G Plimmer
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
M Penfold
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
L Kasperek
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
I Gaze
2 player
P Catton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Downes
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Downes
2 player
M Downes
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Downes
2 player
F Devonshire
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Downes
2 player
M Greig
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
M Downes
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
M Downes
2 player
N Patel
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Downes
2 player
G Plimmer
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Downes
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
M Downes
2 player
L Kasperek
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Downes
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Downes
2 player
P Catton
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
M Downes
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
F Devonshire
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
M Greig
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
N Patel
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
G Plimmer
No Correlation
0
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
L Kasperek
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
P Catton
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
M Greig
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Greig
2 player
M Downes
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Greig
2 player
F Devonshire
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Greig
2 player
M Greig
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Greig
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Greig
2 player
N Patel
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Greig
2 player
G Plimmer
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Greig
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Greig
2 player
L Kasperek
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Greig
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Greig
2 player
P Catton
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
I Gaze
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
M Downes
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
M Greig
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
S Shahri
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
N Patel
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
G Plimmer
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
M Penfold
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
L Kasperek
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Shahri
2 player
P Catton
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
N Patel
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
N Patel
2 player
M Downes
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
N Patel
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
N Patel
2 player
M Greig
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
N Patel
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
N Patel
2 player
N Patel
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N Patel
2 player
G Plimmer
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Patel
2 player
M Penfold
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Patel
2 player
L Kasperek
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Patel
2 player
J Penfold
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
N Patel
2 player
P Catton
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
I Gaze
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
M Downes
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
S Shahri
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
N Patel
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
G Plimmer
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
M Penfold
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
L Kasperek
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
J Penfold
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
G Plimmer
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
I Gaze
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
M Downes
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
S Shahri
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
N Patel
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
G Plimmer
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
M Penfold
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
L Kasperek
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
J Penfold
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Penfold
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
M Downes
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
M Greig
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
N Patel
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
G Plimmer
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
M Penfold
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
L Kasperek
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
J Penfold
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
L Kasperek
2 player
P Catton
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
I Gaze
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
M Downes
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
0
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
S Shahri
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
N Patel
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
G Plimmer
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
M Penfold
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
L Kasperek
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
J Penfold
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
J Penfold
2 player
P Catton
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
P Catton
2 player
I Gaze
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
P Catton
2 player
M Downes
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
P Catton
2 player
F Devonshire
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
P Catton
2 player
M Greig
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
P Catton
2 player
S Shahri
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
P Catton
2 player
N Patel
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
P Catton
2 player
G Plimmer
No Correlation
0
1 player
P Catton
2 player
M Penfold
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
P Catton
2 player
L Kasperek
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
P Catton
2 player
J Penfold
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Catton
2 player
P Catton
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick I Gaze and M Penfold together
Positive Correlation

Pick F Devonshire and M Greig together
Positive Correlation

Pick N Patel and M Penfold together
Positive Correlation

Pick N Patel and J Penfold together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Downes and F Devonshire together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Downes and M Greig together
Negative Correlation

Pick F Devonshire and P Catton together
Negative Correlation

Pick M Greig and P Catton together
Negative Correlation

Pick N Patel and G Plimmer together
Negative Correlation

Pick G Plimmer and L Kasperek together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 L Kasperek

AR
Similar Perfomance
N Patel 0.7
M Penfold 0.7
J Penfold 0.7
I Gaze 0.23
F Devonshire 0.23
M Greig 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
G Plimmer -0.7
M Downes -0.23
S Shahri -0.23
P Catton -0.23

2 N Patel

AR
Similar Perfomance
M Penfold 0.7
L Kasperek 0.7
J Penfold 0.7
I Gaze 0.23
F Devonshire 0.23
M Greig 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
G Plimmer -0.7
M Downes -0.23
S Shahri -0.23
P Catton -0.23

3 F Devonshire

AR
Similar Perfomance
M Greig 0.7
S Shahri 0.23
N Patel 0.23
L Kasperek 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
P Catton -0.7
M Downes -0.7
I Gaze -0.23

4 I Gaze

WK
Similar Perfomance
M Penfold 0.7
M Downes 0.23
N Patel 0.23
L Kasperek 0.23
P Catton 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
S Shahri -0.7
G Plimmer -0.7
F Devonshire -0.23
M Greig -0.23

5 J Penfold

BOW
Similar Perfomance
N Patel 0.7
M Penfold 0.7
L Kasperek 0.7
Opposite Perfomance
G Plimmer -0.7

Best SOI-W Player Combinations

Best SOI-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
S Asmussen BOW SOI-W
J Simmons BOW SOI-W
G Sullivan BOW SOI-W
C Green BOW SOI-W
B James BAT SOI-W
C Blakely BAT SOI-W
H Jensen BOW SOI-W
K Anderson AR SOI-W
F Leydon-Davis AR SOI-W
O Gain BAT SOI-W
P Inglis WK SOI-W
S Asmussen
J Simmons
G Sullivan
C Green
B James
C Blakely
H Jensen
K Anderson
F Leydon-Davis
O Gain
P Inglis
1
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
S Asmussen
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
J Simmons
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
G Sullivan
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
C Green
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
C Blakely
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
K Anderson
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Asmussen
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
S Asmussen
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
J Simmons
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
G Sullivan
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
C Green
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
B James
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
C Blakely
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
H Jensen
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
K Anderson
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
O Gain
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
J Simmons
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
S Asmussen
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
J Simmons
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
G Sullivan
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
C Green
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
B James
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
C Blakely
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
H Jensen
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
K Anderson
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
O Gain
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Green
2 player
S Asmussen
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Green
2 player
J Simmons
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Green
2 player
G Sullivan
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Green
2 player
C Green
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Green
2 player
B James
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Green
2 player
C Blakely
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Green
2 player
H Jensen
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Green
2 player
K Anderson
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Green
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Green
2 player
O Gain
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Green
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
B James
2 player
S Asmussen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B James
2 player
J Simmons
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B James
2 player
G Sullivan
No Correlation
0
1 player
B James
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
1
1 player
B James
2 player
B James
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
B James
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
B James
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
B James
2 player
K Anderson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
B James
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
B James
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
B James
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
S Asmussen
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
J Simmons
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
G Sullivan
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
C Green
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
C Blakely
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
K Anderson
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
S Asmussen
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
J Simmons
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
G Sullivan
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
C Green
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
C Blakely
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
H Jensen
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
K Anderson
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
S Asmussen
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
J Simmons
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
G Sullivan
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
C Green
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
B James
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
C Blakely
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
H Jensen
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
K Anderson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
O Gain
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
S Asmussen
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
J Simmons
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
G Sullivan
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
C Green
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
C Blakely
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
K Anderson
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
O Gain
2 player
S Asmussen
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
O Gain
2 player
J Simmons
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
O Gain
2 player
G Sullivan
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
O Gain
2 player
C Green
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
O Gain
2 player
B James
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
O Gain
2 player
C Blakely
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
O Gain
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
O Gain
2 player
K Anderson
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
O Gain
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
O Gain
2 player
O Gain
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
O Gain
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
S Asmussen
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
J Simmons
No Correlation
0
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
G Sullivan
No Correlation
0
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
K Anderson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
P Inglis
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick S Asmussen and H Jensen together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Simmons and G Sullivan together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Simmons and C Green together
Positive Correlation

Pick G Sullivan and K Anderson together
Positive Correlation

Pick B James and O Gain together
Positive Correlation

Pick H Jensen and O Gain together
Positive Correlation

Pick F Leydon-Davis and O Gain together
Positive Correlation

Pick S Asmussen and J Simmons together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Asmussen and C Green together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Asmussen and K Anderson together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Simmons and B James together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Simmons and C Blakely together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Simmons and H Jensen together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Simmons and F Leydon-Davis together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Simmons and O Gain together
Negative Correlation

Pick G Sullivan and C Blakely together
Negative Correlation

Pick G Sullivan and H Jensen together
Negative Correlation

Pick G Sullivan and F Leydon-Davis together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Green and C Blakely together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Green and H Jensen together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Green and F Leydon-Davis together
Negative Correlation

Pick C Blakely and K Anderson together
Negative Correlation

Pick H Jensen and K Anderson together
Negative Correlation

Pick K Anderson and F Leydon-Davis together
Negative Correlation

Pick K Anderson and O Gain together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 K Anderson

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Simmons 0.7
G Sullivan 0.7
C Green 0.7
P Inglis 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
S Asmussen -0.7
C Blakely -0.7
H Jensen -0.7
F Leydon-Davis -0.7
O Gain -0.7
B James -0.23

2 C Green

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Simmons 0.7
G Sullivan 0.7
K Anderson 0.7
Opposite Perfomance
S Asmussen -0.7
C Blakely -0.7
H Jensen -0.7
F Leydon-Davis -0.7
O Gain -0.7

3 G Sullivan

BOW
Similar Perfomance
J Simmons 0.7
C Green 0.7
K Anderson 0.7
Opposite Perfomance
S Asmussen -0.7
C Blakely -0.7
H Jensen -0.7
F Leydon-Davis -0.7
O Gain -0.7

4 J Simmons

BOW
Similar Perfomance
G Sullivan 0.7
C Green 0.7
K Anderson 0.7
Opposite Perfomance
S Asmussen -0.7
B James -0.7
C Blakely -0.7
H Jensen -0.7
F Leydon-Davis -0.7
O Gain -0.7

5 P Inglis

WK
Similar Perfomance
B James 0.23
K Anderson 0.23
Opposite Perfomance
S Asmussen -0.23
C Blakely -0.23
H Jensen -0.23
F Leydon-Davis -0.23

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved