Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
CM-W 07 Jan 10:50 am OS-W

Lineup Out

Hagley Oval
Women New Zealand T20 Domestic

Best Player Combinations For
CM-W vs OS-W

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

CM-W vs OS-W

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best CM-W Player Combinations

Best CM-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
I Sharp BAT CM-W
M Penna AR CM-W
L Hughes WK CM-W
N Cox BAT CM-W
K Ebrahim AR CM-W
G Sullivan BOW CM-W
M Banks BOW CM-W
K Anderson AR CM-W
A Gerken WK CM-W
J Dean BAT CM-W
S Pandey BOW CM-W
I Sharp
M Penna
L Hughes
N Cox
K Ebrahim
G Sullivan
M Banks
K Anderson
A Gerken
J Dean
S Pandey
1
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
I Sharp
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
L Hughes
Weak Positive Correlation
0.49
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
N Cox
Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
K Ebrahim
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
G Sullivan
No Correlation
-0.21
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
M Banks
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.13
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
K Anderson
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
A Gerken
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
J Dean
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
S Pandey
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Penna
2 player
I Sharp
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Penna
2 player
M Penna
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Penna
2 player
L Hughes
Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
M Penna
2 player
N Cox
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Penna
2 player
K Ebrahim
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Penna
2 player
G Sullivan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
M Penna
2 player
M Banks
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
M Penna
2 player
K Anderson
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Penna
2 player
A Gerken
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Penna
2 player
J Dean
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Penna
2 player
S Pandey
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
I Sharp
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
M Penna
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
L Hughes
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
N Cox
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
K Ebrahim
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
G Sullivan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
M Banks
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
K Anderson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
A Gerken
Weak Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
J Dean
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
S Pandey
No Correlation
0.49
1 player
N Cox
2 player
I Sharp
Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
N Cox
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
N Cox
2 player
L Hughes
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N Cox
2 player
N Cox
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
N Cox
2 player
K Ebrahim
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
N Cox
2 player
G Sullivan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
N Cox
2 player
M Banks
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
N Cox
2 player
K Anderson
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
N Cox
2 player
A Gerken
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
N Cox
2 player
J Dean
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N Cox
2 player
S Pandey
Negative Correlation
0.03
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
I Sharp
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
M Penna
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
L Hughes
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
N Cox
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
K Ebrahim
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
G Sullivan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
M Banks
Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
K Anderson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
A Gerken
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
J Dean
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
S Pandey
Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
I Sharp
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
M Penna
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
L Hughes
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
N Cox
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
K Ebrahim
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
G Sullivan
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
M Banks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
K Anderson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.24
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
A Gerken
Weak Negative Correlation
0.07
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
J Dean
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
S Pandey
Positive Correlation
-0.21
1 player
M Banks
2 player
I Sharp
Weak Negative Correlation
0.06
1 player
M Banks
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
M Banks
2 player
L Hughes
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
M Banks
2 player
N Cox
No Correlation
0.41
1 player
M Banks
2 player
K Ebrahim
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
M Banks
2 player
G Sullivan
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Banks
2 player
M Banks
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Banks
2 player
K Anderson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
M Banks
2 player
A Gerken
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
M Banks
2 player
J Dean
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Banks
2 player
S Pandey
Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
I Sharp
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
M Penna
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
L Hughes
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
N Cox
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
K Ebrahim
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
G Sullivan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
M Banks
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
K Anderson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
A Gerken
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
J Dean
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
S Pandey
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
I Sharp
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
L Hughes
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
N Cox
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
K Ebrahim
No Correlation
-0.24
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
G Sullivan
Weak Negative Correlation
0.03
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
M Banks
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
K Anderson
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
A Gerken
Strong Positive Correlation
0.78
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
J Dean
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
S Pandey
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
J Dean
2 player
I Sharp
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Dean
2 player
M Penna
Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
J Dean
2 player
L Hughes
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
J Dean
2 player
N Cox
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
J Dean
2 player
K Ebrahim
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
J Dean
2 player
G Sullivan
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
J Dean
2 player
M Banks
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Dean
2 player
K Anderson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.78
1 player
J Dean
2 player
A Gerken
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Dean
2 player
J Dean
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
J Dean
2 player
S Pandey
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
I Sharp
Negative Correlation
0.4
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
M Penna
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
L Hughes
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
N Cox
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
K Ebrahim
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
G Sullivan
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
M Banks
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
K Anderson
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
A Gerken
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
J Dean
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
S Pandey
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick K Ebrahim and S Pandey together
Positive Correlation

Pick G Sullivan and S Pandey together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Banks and S Pandey together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Anderson and S Pandey together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Gerken and J Dean together
Positive Correlation

Don’t Pick I Sharp and S Pandey together
Negative Correlation

Don’t Pick N Cox and S Pandey together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 M Banks

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Pandey 0.7
K Ebrahim 0.41
K Anderson 0.33
G Sullivan 0.27
L Hughes 0.18
N Cox 0.16
J Dean 0.13
M Penna 0.06
A Gerken 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
I Sharp -0.21

2 K Anderson

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Pandey 0.7
G Sullivan 0.39
M Penna 0.36
K Ebrahim 0.36
M Banks 0.33
J Dean 0.33
L Hughes 0.25
N Cox 0.1
A Gerken 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
I Sharp -0.13

3 G Sullivan

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Pandey 0.7
K Anderson 0.39
M Penna 0.35
K Ebrahim 0.3
M Banks 0.27
L Hughes 0.23
N Cox 0.2
J Dean 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
A Gerken -0.24
I Sharp -0.05

4 L Hughes

WK
Similar Perfomance
J Dean 0.59
M Penna 0.42
N Cox 0.42
A Gerken 0.39
I Sharp 0.36
K Anderson 0.25
K Ebrahim 0.23
G Sullivan 0.23
M Banks 0.18

5 N Cox

BAT
Similar Perfomance
I Sharp 0.49
J Dean 0.48
L Hughes 0.42
A Gerken 0.28
G Sullivan 0.2
M Banks 0.16
K Ebrahim 0.12
K Anderson 0.1
Opposite Perfomance
S Pandey -0.7
M Penna -0.1

Best OS-W Player Combinations

Best OS-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
A Browning AR OS-W
K Gordon BOW OS-W
B James WK OS-W
E Carson BOW OS-W
C Blakely BAT OS-W
H Jensen AR OS-W
E Black AR OS-W
F Leydon-Davis AR OS-W
O Gain BAT OS-W
P Inglis WK OS-W
S Bates AR OS-W
A Browning
K Gordon
B James
E Carson
C Blakely
H Jensen
E Black
F Leydon-Davis
O Gain
P Inglis
S Bates
1
1 player
A Browning
2 player
A Browning
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Browning
2 player
K Gordon
Negative Correlation
-0.05
1 player
A Browning
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
A Browning
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
A Browning
2 player
C Blakely
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
A Browning
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
A Browning
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
A Browning
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
A Browning
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Browning
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
A Browning
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
A Browning
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
K Gordon
Strong Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
B James
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
E Carson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
B James
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
B James
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
1
1 player
B James
2 player
B James
Strong Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
B James
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
B James
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
B James
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
B James
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
B James
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.61
1 player
B James
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
B James
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
B James
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
E Carson
2 player
A Browning
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Carson
2 player
K Gordon
Strong Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
E Carson
2 player
B James
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Carson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
E Carson
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
E Carson
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
E Carson
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
E Carson
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
E Carson
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
E Carson
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
A Browning
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
C Blakely
Strong Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
A Browning
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
H Jensen
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
S Bates
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
E Black
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
E Black
2 player
K Gordon
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
E Black
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Carson
Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
E Black
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
E Black
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Black
Strong Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
E Black
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
E Black
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
E Black
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
E Black
2 player
S Bates
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
K Gordon
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
C Blakely
Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
O Gain
2 player
A Browning
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
O Gain
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
0.61
1 player
O Gain
2 player
B James
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
O Gain
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
O Gain
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
O Gain
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
O Gain
2 player
O Gain
Strong Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
O Gain
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
O Gain
2 player
S Bates
Weak Negative Correlation
0.3
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
A Browning
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
B James
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
O Gain
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
P Inglis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
S Bates
2 player
A Browning
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
S Bates
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
S Bates
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
S Bates
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
S Bates
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
S Bates
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
S Bates
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
S Bates
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
S Bates
2 player
O Gain
Weak Negative Correlation
0.16
1 player
S Bates
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Bates
2 player
S Bates
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick K Gordon and E Carson together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick B James and O Gain together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 S Bates

AR
Similar Perfomance
E Black 0.41
E Carson 0.35
A Browning 0.32
H Jensen 0.22
P Inglis 0.16
B James 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
O Gain -0.22
K Gordon -0.1
F Leydon-Davis -0.03
C Blakely -0.02

2 E Black

AR
Similar Perfomance
E Carson 0.48
K Gordon 0.47
S Bates 0.41
F Leydon-Davis 0.39
H Jensen 0.34
P Inglis 0.28
B James 0.21
A Browning 0.1
O Gain 0.09
C Blakely 0.07

3 E Carson

BOW
Similar Perfomance
K Gordon 1
E Black 0.48
S Bates 0.35
A Browning 0.28
F Leydon-Davis 0.25
P Inglis 0.21
H Jensen 0.19
B James 0.15
C Blakely 0.11
O Gain 0.1

4 H Jensen

AR
Similar Perfomance
F Leydon-Davis 0.51
P Inglis 0.37
E Black 0.34
K Gordon 0.27
A Browning 0.22
S Bates 0.22
E Carson 0.19
B James 0.18
C Blakely 0.15
O Gain 0.11

5 P Inglis

WK
Similar Perfomance
F Leydon-Davis 0.44
B James 0.4
H Jensen 0.37
C Blakely 0.36
O Gain 0.32
A Browning 0.3
E Black 0.28
E Carson 0.21
K Gordon 0.18
S Bates 0.16

Best CM-W Player Combinations

Best CM-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
I Sharp BAT CM-W
M Penna AR CM-W
L Hughes WK CM-W
N Cox BAT CM-W
K Ebrahim AR CM-W
G Sullivan BOW CM-W
M Banks BOW CM-W
K Anderson AR CM-W
A Gerken WK CM-W
J Dean BAT CM-W
S Pandey BOW CM-W
I Sharp
M Penna
L Hughes
N Cox
K Ebrahim
G Sullivan
M Banks
K Anderson
A Gerken
J Dean
S Pandey
1
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
I Sharp
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
L Hughes
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
N Cox
Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
K Ebrahim
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
G Sullivan
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
M Banks
Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
K Anderson
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
A Gerken
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
J Dean
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
I Sharp
2 player
S Pandey
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Penna
2 player
I Sharp
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Penna
2 player
M Penna
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Penna
2 player
L Hughes
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Penna
2 player
N Cox
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Penna
2 player
K Ebrahim
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Penna
2 player
G Sullivan
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Penna
2 player
M Banks
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
M Penna
2 player
K Anderson
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Penna
2 player
A Gerken
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Penna
2 player
J Dean
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Penna
2 player
S Pandey
Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
I Sharp
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
L Hughes
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
N Cox
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
K Ebrahim
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
G Sullivan
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
M Banks
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
K Anderson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.18
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
A Gerken
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
J Dean
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
L Hughes
2 player
S Pandey
Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
N Cox
2 player
I Sharp
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
N Cox
2 player
M Penna
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
N Cox
2 player
L Hughes
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Cox
2 player
N Cox
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
N Cox
2 player
K Ebrahim
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
N Cox
2 player
G Sullivan
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
N Cox
2 player
M Banks
No Correlation
-0.73
1 player
N Cox
2 player
K Anderson
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
N Cox
2 player
A Gerken
Weak Negative Correlation
0.17
1 player
N Cox
2 player
J Dean
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N Cox
2 player
S Pandey
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
I Sharp
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
L Hughes
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
N Cox
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
K Ebrahim
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
G Sullivan
No Correlation
0.71
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
M Banks
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
K Anderson
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
A Gerken
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
J Dean
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Ebrahim
2 player
S Pandey
Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
I Sharp
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
L Hughes
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
N Cox
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
K Ebrahim
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
G Sullivan
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
M Banks
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
K Anderson
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
A Gerken
Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
J Dean
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Sullivan
2 player
S Pandey
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
M Banks
2 player
I Sharp
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Banks
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
M Banks
2 player
L Hughes
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
M Banks
2 player
N Cox
No Correlation
0.71
1 player
M Banks
2 player
K Ebrahim
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
M Banks
2 player
G Sullivan
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Banks
2 player
M Banks
Strong Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
M Banks
2 player
K Anderson
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
M Banks
2 player
A Gerken
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
M Banks
2 player
J Dean
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Banks
2 player
S Pandey
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
I Sharp
Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
M Penna
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
L Hughes
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.73
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
N Cox
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
K Ebrahim
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
G Sullivan
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
M Banks
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
K Anderson
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
A Gerken
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
J Dean
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Anderson
2 player
S Pandey
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
I Sharp
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
L Hughes
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
N Cox
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
K Ebrahim
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
G Sullivan
Negative Correlation
-0.18
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
M Banks
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
K Anderson
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
A Gerken
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
J Dean
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Gerken
2 player
S Pandey
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Dean
2 player
I Sharp
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Dean
2 player
M Penna
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Dean
2 player
L Hughes
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
J Dean
2 player
N Cox
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Dean
2 player
K Ebrahim
Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
J Dean
2 player
G Sullivan
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
J Dean
2 player
M Banks
No Correlation
-0.38
1 player
J Dean
2 player
K Anderson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Dean
2 player
A Gerken
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
J Dean
2 player
J Dean
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Dean
2 player
S Pandey
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
I Sharp
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
M Penna
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
L Hughes
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
N Cox
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
K Ebrahim
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
G Sullivan
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
M Banks
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
K Anderson
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
A Gerken
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
J Dean
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Pandey
2 player
S Pandey
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick K Ebrahim and M Banks together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Penna and S Pandey together
Negative Correlation

Pick L Hughes and S Pandey together
Negative Correlation

Pick N Cox and K Anderson together
Negative Correlation

Pick K Ebrahim and J Dean together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Dean and S Pandey together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 M Banks

BOW
Similar Perfomance
K Ebrahim 0.71
S Pandey 0.7
G Sullivan 0.22
K Anderson 0.17
Opposite Perfomance
I Sharp -0.5
L Hughes -0.2
A Gerken -0.18
M Penna -0.14
J Dean -0.07
N Cox -0.04

2 K Anderson

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Pandey 0.7
G Sullivan 0.18
M Banks 0.17
Opposite Perfomance
N Cox -0.73
I Sharp -0.5
M Penna -0.42
J Dean -0.38
L Hughes -0.25
K Ebrahim -0.14

3 G Sullivan

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Pandey 0.7
M Banks 0.22
K Anderson 0.18
Opposite Perfomance
A Gerken -0.5
J Dean -0.27
I Sharp -0.2
L Hughes -0.13
N Cox -0.09

4 L Hughes

WK
Similar Perfomance
I Sharp 0.38
J Dean 0.33
A Gerken 0.18
M Penna 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
S Pandey -0.7
K Anderson -0.25
M Banks -0.2
K Ebrahim -0.14
G Sullivan -0.13
N Cox -0.04

5 N Cox

BAT
Similar Perfomance
I Sharp 0.43
M Penna 0.23
J Dean 0.17
Opposite Perfomance
K Anderson -0.73
S Pandey -0.7
A Gerken -0.25
G Sullivan -0.09
L Hughes -0.04
M Banks -0.04

Best OS-W Player Combinations

Best OS-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
A Browning AR OS-W
K Gordon BOW OS-W
B James WK OS-W
E Carson BOW OS-W
C Blakely BAT OS-W
H Jensen AR OS-W
E Black AR OS-W
F Leydon-Davis AR OS-W
O Gain BAT OS-W
P Inglis WK OS-W
S Bates AR OS-W
A Browning
K Gordon
B James
E Carson
C Blakely
H Jensen
E Black
F Leydon-Davis
O Gain
P Inglis
S Bates
1
1 player
A Browning
2 player
A Browning
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Browning
2 player
K Gordon
Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
A Browning
2 player
B James
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Browning
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Browning
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Browning
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
A Browning
2 player
E Black
Weak Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
A Browning
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Strong Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Browning
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
A Browning
2 player
P Inglis
Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
A Browning
2 player
S Bates
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
A Browning
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
K Gordon
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
B James
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
E Carson
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
H Jensen
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
O Gain
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
K Gordon
2 player
S Bates
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
B James
2 player
A Browning
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B James
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
B James
2 player
B James
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
B James
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
B James
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.24
1 player
B James
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Negative Correlation
0.04
1 player
B James
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
B James
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
B James
2 player
O Gain
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
B James
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
-0.39
1 player
B James
2 player
S Bates
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
E Carson
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
E Carson
2 player
K Gordon
Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
E Carson
2 player
B James
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Carson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
E Carson
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0
1 player
E Carson
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
E Carson
2 player
E Black
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
E Carson
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Carson
2 player
O Gain
Weak Negative Correlation
0.04
1 player
E Carson
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
E Carson
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
A Browning
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Negative Correlation
0.21
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
B James
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
C Blakely
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
-0.31
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
E Black
Weak Negative Correlation
0.17
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
-0.15
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
-0.44
1 player
C Blakely
2 player
S Bates
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
K Gordon
Positive Correlation
-0.24
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
B James
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
-0.13
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
H Jensen
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
-0.16
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
H Jensen
2 player
S Bates
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
E Black
2 player
A Browning
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
E Black
2 player
K Gordon
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
E Black
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Carson
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.31
1 player
E Black
2 player
C Blakely
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
E Black
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Black
2 player
E Black
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.3
1 player
E Black
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.28
1 player
E Black
2 player
O Gain
Weak Negative Correlation
0.03
1 player
E Black
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
E Black
2 player
S Bates
Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
A Browning
Strong Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
B James
No Correlation
-0.05
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
E Black
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
P Inglis
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.79
1 player
F Leydon-Davis
2 player
S Bates
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
O Gain
2 player
A Browning
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
O Gain
2 player
K Gordon
Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
O Gain
2 player
B James
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Carson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.15
1 player
O Gain
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
-0.16
1 player
O Gain
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
-0.28
1 player
O Gain
2 player
E Black
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
O Gain
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
No Correlation
1
1 player
O Gain
2 player
O Gain
Strong Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
O Gain
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
-0.24
1 player
O Gain
2 player
S Bates
Weak Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
A Browning
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
B James
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
C Blakely
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
H Jensen
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
E Black
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Weak Negative Correlation
0.15
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
O Gain
No Correlation
1
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
P Inglis
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
P Inglis
2 player
S Bates
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
S Bates
2 player
A Browning
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Bates
2 player
K Gordon
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.39
1 player
S Bates
2 player
B James
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
S Bates
2 player
E Carson
No Correlation
-0.44
1 player
S Bates
2 player
C Blakely
Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
S Bates
2 player
H Jensen
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
S Bates
2 player
E Black
Positive Correlation
-0.79
1 player
S Bates
2 player
F Leydon-Davis
Negative Correlation
-0.24
1 player
S Bates
2 player
O Gain
Weak Negative Correlation
0.04
1 player
S Bates
2 player
P Inglis
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Bates
2 player
S Bates
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick A Browning and P Inglis together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Browning and S Bates together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Gordon and H Jensen together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Browning and K Gordon together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Browning and B James together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Browning and F Leydon-Davis together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick K Gordon and O Gain together
Negative Correlation

Pick F Leydon-Davis and S Bates together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 E Black

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Bates 0.42
E Carson 0.25
B James 0.04
P Inglis 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
A Browning -0.33
C Blakely -0.31
F Leydon-Davis -0.3
O Gain -0.28

2 E Carson

BOW
Similar Perfomance
K Gordon 0.7
E Black 0.25
A Browning 0.14
S Bates 0.08
P Inglis 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
O Gain -0.33
C Blakely -0.12
F Leydon-Davis -0.05
B James -0.04

3 S Bates

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Browning 0.67
E Black 0.42
E Carson 0.08
P Inglis 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
F Leydon-Davis -0.79
C Blakely -0.44
B James -0.39
H Jensen -0.27
O Gain -0.24
K Gordon -0.23

4 P Inglis

WK
Similar Perfomance
A Browning 0.67
K Gordon 0.33
O Gain 0.15
E Carson 0.04
S Bates 0.04
E Black 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
F Leydon-Davis -0.25
C Blakely -0.07
H Jensen -0.04

5 H Jensen

AR
Similar Perfomance
K Gordon 0.7
F Leydon-Davis 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
S Bates -0.27
B James -0.24
O Gain -0.16
A Browning -0.14
C Blakely -0.13
P Inglis -0.04

More on PL Labs

CM-W vs OS-W

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only