CHI 12 Oct 08:00 am LAW

Lineup Out

University of Texas Dallas
National Cricket League T10

Best Player Combinations For
CHI vs LAW

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best CHI Player Combinations

Best CHI Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
M Leask AR CHI
C Lynn BAT CHI
R Uthappa WK CHI
K Gatepalli BOW CHI
I Souness AR CHI
L Julien BAT CHI
S Harmer AR CHI
K Sana BOW CHI
M Louis BAT CHI
R Bopara AR CHI
S Tanvir BOW CHI
M Leask
C Lynn
R Uthappa
K Gatepalli
I Souness
L Julien
S Harmer
K Sana
M Louis
R Bopara
S Tanvir
1
1 player
M Leask
2 player
M Leask
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
M Leask
2 player
C Lynn
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
M Leask
2 player
R Uthappa
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
M Leask
2 player
K Gatepalli
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
M Leask
2 player
I Souness
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
M Leask
2 player
L Julien
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
M Leask
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
M Leask
2 player
K Sana
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Leask
2 player
M Louis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
M Leask
2 player
R Bopara
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
M Leask
2 player
S Tanvir
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
M Leask
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
C Lynn
Strong Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
R Uthappa
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
K Gatepalli
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
I Souness
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
L Julien
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
K Sana
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
M Louis
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
R Bopara
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
S Tanvir
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
M Leask
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
C Lynn
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
R Uthappa
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
K Gatepalli
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
I Souness
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
L Julien
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
K Sana
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
M Louis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
R Bopara
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
S Tanvir
Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
M Leask
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
C Lynn
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
R Uthappa
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
K Gatepalli
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
I Souness
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
L Julien
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
S Harmer
Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
K Sana
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
M Louis
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
R Bopara
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
S Tanvir
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
I Souness
2 player
M Leask
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
I Souness
2 player
C Lynn
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
I Souness
2 player
R Uthappa
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
I Souness
2 player
K Gatepalli
No Correlation
1
1 player
I Souness
2 player
I Souness
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
I Souness
2 player
L Julien
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
I Souness
2 player
S Harmer
Weak Negative Correlation
0.6
1 player
I Souness
2 player
K Sana
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
I Souness
2 player
M Louis
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
I Souness
2 player
R Bopara
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
I Souness
2 player
S Tanvir
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
L Julien
2 player
M Leask
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
L Julien
2 player
C Lynn
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
L Julien
2 player
R Uthappa
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
L Julien
2 player
K Gatepalli
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
L Julien
2 player
I Souness
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Julien
2 player
L Julien
Strong Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
L Julien
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
L Julien
2 player
K Sana
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Julien
2 player
M Louis
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
L Julien
2 player
R Bopara
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
L Julien
2 player
S Tanvir
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
M Leask
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
C Lynn
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
R Uthappa
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
K Gatepalli
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
I Souness
Weak Negative Correlation
0.16
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
L Julien
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
S Harmer
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
K Sana
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
M Louis
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
R Bopara
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
S Tanvir
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
K Sana
2 player
M Leask
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Sana
2 player
C Lynn
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
K Sana
2 player
R Uthappa
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
K Sana
2 player
K Gatepalli
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
K Sana
2 player
I Souness
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
K Sana
2 player
L Julien
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
K Sana
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Sana
2 player
K Sana
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
K Sana
2 player
M Louis
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
K Sana
2 player
R Bopara
Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
K Sana
2 player
S Tanvir
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Louis
2 player
M Leask
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
M Louis
2 player
C Lynn
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Louis
2 player
R Uthappa
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Louis
2 player
K Gatepalli
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Louis
2 player
I Souness
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Louis
2 player
L Julien
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Louis
2 player
S Harmer
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
M Louis
2 player
K Sana
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Louis
2 player
M Louis
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
M Louis
2 player
R Bopara
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
M Louis
2 player
S Tanvir
Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
M Leask
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
C Lynn
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
R Uthappa
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
K Gatepalli
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
I Souness
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
L Julien
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
K Sana
Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
M Louis
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
R Bopara
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
S Tanvir
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
M Leask
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
C Lynn
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
R Uthappa
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
K Gatepalli
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
I Souness
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
L Julien
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
S Harmer
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
K Sana
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
M Louis
Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
R Bopara
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
S Tanvir
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick R Uthappa and S Tanvir together
Positive Correlation

Pick I Souness and K Sana together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Sana and R Bopara together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 K Gatepalli

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Tanvir 0.48
R Uthappa 0.42
L Julien 0.42
M Louis 0.42
C Lynn 0.4
S Harmer 0.4
R Bopara 0.12
M Leask 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
I Souness -0.2
K Sana -0.05

2 S Harmer

AR
Similar Perfomance
K Gatepalli 0.4
S Tanvir 0.39
M Louis 0.23
L Julien 0.16
M Leask 0.1
C Lynn 0.06
R Uthappa 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
I Souness -0.4
K Sana -0.1

3 R Uthappa

WK
Similar Perfomance
S Tanvir 0.6
C Lynn 0.47
L Julien 0.43
K Gatepalli 0.42
M Louis 0.33
I Souness 0.23
K Sana 0.21
M Leask 0.19
S Harmer 0.06
R Bopara 0.05

4 M Louis

BAT
Similar Perfomance
S Tanvir 0.43
K Gatepalli 0.42
M Leask 0.35
R Uthappa 0.33
L Julien 0.33
S Harmer 0.23
K Sana 0.07
C Lynn 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
R Bopara -0.02

5 C Lynn

BAT
Similar Perfomance
R Uthappa 0.47
K Gatepalli 0.4
I Souness 0.28
K Sana 0.2
R Bopara 0.18
L Julien 0.16
S Tanvir 0.13
S Harmer 0.06
M Louis 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
M Leask -0.1

Best LAW Player Combinations

Best LAW Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
G Munsey WK LAW
R Ramesh BOW LAW
W Saleem AR LAW
T David BAT LAW
T Mills BOW LAW
R Raees BOW LAW
T Astle BOW LAW
S Eskinazi BAT LAW
A Rossington WK LAW
J Burns BAT LAW
S Al Hasan AR LAW
G Munsey
R Ramesh
W Saleem
T David
T Mills
R Raees
T Astle
S Eskinazi
A Rossington
J Burns
S Al Hasan
1
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
G Munsey
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
R Ramesh
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
W Saleem
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
T David
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
T Mills
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
R Raees
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
T Astle
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
S Eskinazi
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
A Rossington
Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
J Burns
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
S Al Hasan
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
G Munsey
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
R Ramesh
Strong Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
W Saleem
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
T David
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
T Mills
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
R Raees
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
T Astle
Weak Negative Correlation
0.36
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
S Eskinazi
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
A Rossington
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
J Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
S Al Hasan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
G Munsey
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
R Ramesh
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
W Saleem
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
T David
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
T Mills
No Correlation
0.77
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
R Raees
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
T Astle
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
S Eskinazi
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
A Rossington
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
J Burns
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
S Al Hasan
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
T David
2 player
G Munsey
Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
T David
2 player
R Ramesh
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
T David
2 player
W Saleem
No Correlation
1
1 player
T David
2 player
T David
Strong Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
T David
2 player
T Mills
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
T David
2 player
R Raees
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
T David
2 player
T Astle
Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
T David
2 player
S Eskinazi
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
T David
2 player
A Rossington
Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
T David
2 player
J Burns
No Correlation
0.76
1 player
T David
2 player
S Al Hasan
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
T Mills
2 player
G Munsey
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Mills
2 player
R Ramesh
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
T Mills
2 player
W Saleem
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
T Mills
2 player
T David
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Mills
2 player
T Mills
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
T Mills
2 player
R Raees
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
T Mills
2 player
T Astle
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
T Mills
2 player
S Eskinazi
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
T Mills
2 player
A Rossington
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
T Mills
2 player
J Burns
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
T Mills
2 player
S Al Hasan
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
R Raees
2 player
G Munsey
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
R Raees
2 player
R Ramesh
No Correlation
0.77
1 player
R Raees
2 player
W Saleem
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
R Raees
2 player
T David
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Raees
2 player
T Mills
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Raees
2 player
R Raees
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
R Raees
2 player
T Astle
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
R Raees
2 player
S Eskinazi
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Raees
2 player
A Rossington
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
R Raees
2 player
J Burns
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
R Raees
2 player
S Al Hasan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
T Astle
2 player
G Munsey
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
T Astle
2 player
R Ramesh
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Astle
2 player
W Saleem
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
T Astle
2 player
T David
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
T Astle
2 player
T Mills
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
T Astle
2 player
R Raees
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Astle
2 player
T Astle
Strong Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
T Astle
2 player
S Eskinazi
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
T Astle
2 player
A Rossington
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
T Astle
2 player
J Burns
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
T Astle
2 player
S Al Hasan
Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
G Munsey
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
R Ramesh
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
W Saleem
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
T David
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
T Mills
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
R Raees
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
T Astle
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
S Eskinazi
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.3
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
A Rossington
Weak Negative Correlation
0.53
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
J Burns
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
S Al Hasan
Weak Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
G Munsey
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
R Ramesh
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
W Saleem
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
T David
Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
T Mills
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
R Raees
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
T Astle
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.3
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
S Eskinazi
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
A Rossington
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
J Burns
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
S Al Hasan
Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
J Burns
2 player
G Munsey
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
J Burns
2 player
R Ramesh
Weak Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
J Burns
2 player
W Saleem
Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
J Burns
2 player
T David
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
J Burns
2 player
T Mills
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
J Burns
2 player
R Raees
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
J Burns
2 player
T Astle
No Correlation
0.53
1 player
J Burns
2 player
S Eskinazi
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Burns
2 player
A Rossington
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Burns
2 player
J Burns
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
J Burns
2 player
S Al Hasan
Weak Negative Correlation
0.45
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
G Munsey
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
R Ramesh
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
W Saleem
No Correlation
0.76
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
T David
Positive Correlation
0.62
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
T Mills
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
R Raees
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
T Astle
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
S Eskinazi
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
A Rossington
Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
J Burns
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
S Al Hasan
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick G Munsey and A Rossington together
Positive Correlation

Pick W Saleem and R Raees together
Positive Correlation

Pick T David and T Mills together
Positive Correlation

Pick T David and T Astle together
Positive Correlation

Pick T David and S Al Hasan together
Positive Correlation

Pick T Mills and S Al Hasan together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 T David

BAT
Similar Perfomance
S Al Hasan 0.76
T Mills 0.67
T Astle 0.6
A Rossington 0.54
G Munsey 0.42
R Raees 0.08
S Eskinazi 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
J Burns -0.18
W Saleem -0.12
R Ramesh -0.07

2 T Mills

BOW
Similar Perfomance
T David 0.67
S Al Hasan 0.62
T Astle 0.48
A Rossington 0.26
R Raees 0.23
S Eskinazi 0.23
G Munsey 0.22
W Saleem 0.17
J Burns 0.06

3 A Rossington

WK
Similar Perfomance
G Munsey 0.62
T David 0.54
S Al Hasan 0.4
T Mills 0.26
T Astle 0.23
R Raees 0.2
R Ramesh 0.13
Opposite Perfomance
S Eskinazi -0.3
J Burns -0.14
W Saleem -0.02

4 R Ramesh

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Eskinazi 0.36
S Al Hasan 0.33
J Burns 0.26
W Saleem 0.24
A Rossington 0.13
G Munsey 0.1
R Raees 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
T Astle -0.25
T David -0.07

5 G Munsey

WK
Similar Perfomance
A Rossington 0.62
T Astle 0.47
S Al Hasan 0.45
T David 0.42
T Mills 0.22
R Raees 0.22
S Eskinazi 0.16
R Ramesh 0.1
W Saleem 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
J Burns -0.04

Best CHI Player Combinations

Best CHI Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
M Leask AR CHI
C Lynn BAT CHI
R Uthappa WK CHI
K Gatepalli BOW CHI
I Souness AR CHI
L Julien BAT CHI
S Harmer AR CHI
K Sana BOW CHI
M Louis BAT CHI
R Bopara AR CHI
S Tanvir BOW CHI
M Leask
C Lynn
R Uthappa
K Gatepalli
I Souness
L Julien
S Harmer
K Sana
M Louis
R Bopara
S Tanvir
1
1 player
M Leask
2 player
M Leask
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Leask
2 player
C Lynn
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Leask
2 player
R Uthappa
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
M Leask
2 player
K Gatepalli
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
M Leask
2 player
I Souness
Weak Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
M Leask
2 player
L Julien
Strong Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Leask
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Leask
2 player
K Sana
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Leask
2 player
M Louis
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Leask
2 player
R Bopara
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Leask
2 player
S Tanvir
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
M Leask
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
C Lynn
Strong Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
R Uthappa
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
K Gatepalli
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
I Souness
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
L Julien
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
K Sana
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
M Louis
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
R Bopara
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
S Tanvir
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
M Leask
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
C Lynn
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
R Uthappa
Strong Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
K Gatepalli
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
I Souness
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
L Julien
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
S Harmer
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
K Sana
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
M Louis
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
R Bopara
Negative Correlation
0.71
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
S Tanvir
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
M Leask
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
C Lynn
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
R Uthappa
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
K Gatepalli
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
I Souness
Weak Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
L Julien
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
S Harmer
Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
K Sana
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
M Louis
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
R Bopara
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
S Tanvir
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
I Souness
2 player
M Leask
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
I Souness
2 player
C Lynn
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
I Souness
2 player
R Uthappa
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
I Souness
2 player
K Gatepalli
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
I Souness
2 player
I Souness
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
I Souness
2 player
L Julien
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
I Souness
2 player
S Harmer
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
I Souness
2 player
K Sana
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
I Souness
2 player
M Louis
No Correlation
0
1 player
I Souness
2 player
R Bopara
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
I Souness
2 player
S Tanvir
No Correlation
-1
1 player
L Julien
2 player
M Leask
Strong Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Julien
2 player
C Lynn
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Julien
2 player
R Uthappa
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
L Julien
2 player
K Gatepalli
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Julien
2 player
I Souness
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Julien
2 player
L Julien
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Julien
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Julien
2 player
K Sana
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Julien
2 player
M Louis
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Julien
2 player
R Bopara
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Julien
2 player
S Tanvir
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
M Leask
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
C Lynn
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
R Uthappa
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
K Gatepalli
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
I Souness
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
L Julien
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
S Harmer
Strong Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
K Sana
Strong Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
M Louis
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
R Bopara
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
S Tanvir
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Sana
2 player
M Leask
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
K Sana
2 player
C Lynn
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
K Sana
2 player
R Uthappa
Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
K Sana
2 player
K Gatepalli
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Sana
2 player
I Souness
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
K Sana
2 player
L Julien
No Correlation
-1
1 player
K Sana
2 player
S Harmer
Strong Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K Sana
2 player
K Sana
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
K Sana
2 player
M Louis
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
K Sana
2 player
R Bopara
Positive Correlation
-0.71
1 player
K Sana
2 player
S Tanvir
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Louis
2 player
M Leask
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Louis
2 player
C Lynn
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Louis
2 player
R Uthappa
Weak Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Louis
2 player
K Gatepalli
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Louis
2 player
I Souness
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Louis
2 player
L Julien
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Louis
2 player
S Harmer
Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
M Louis
2 player
K Sana
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Louis
2 player
M Louis
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
M Louis
2 player
R Bopara
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Louis
2 player
S Tanvir
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
M Leask
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
C Lynn
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
R Uthappa
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
K Gatepalli
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
I Souness
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
L Julien
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
S Harmer
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
K Sana
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
M Louis
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
R Bopara
Strong Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
S Tanvir
Strong Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
M Leask
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
C Lynn
No Correlation
0.71
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
R Uthappa
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
K Gatepalli
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
I Souness
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
L Julien
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
S Harmer
Positive Correlation
-0.71
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
K Sana
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
M Louis
Weak Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
R Bopara
Strong Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
S Tanvir
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick R Uthappa and K Gatepalli together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Gatepalli and L Julien together
Positive Correlation

Pick S Harmer and S Tanvir together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Leask and L Julien together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick R Uthappa and R Bopara together
Negative Correlation

Pick K Gatepalli and K Sana together
Negative Correlation

Pick I Souness and S Harmer together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Harmer and K Sana together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick K Sana and M Louis together
Negative Correlation

Pick K Sana and S Tanvir together
Negative Correlation

Pick R Bopara and S Tanvir together
Strong Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 S Harmer

AR
Similar Perfomance
S Tanvir 0.67
K Gatepalli 0.42
M Louis 0.42
R Uthappa 0.33
M Leask 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
K Sana -1
I Souness -0.7
R Bopara -0.42

2 S Tanvir

BOW
Similar Perfomance
R Uthappa 0.71
S Harmer 0.67
M Leask 0.33
K Gatepalli 0.33
M Louis 0.33
C Lynn 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
R Bopara -1
K Sana -0.71
I Souness -0.14
L Julien -0.14

3 K Gatepalli

BOW
Similar Perfomance
R Uthappa 0.67
L Julien 0.67
S Harmer 0.42
M Louis 0.42
S Tanvir 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
K Sana -0.67
M Leask -0.42
I Souness -0.35
R Bopara -0.14

4 M Louis

BAT
Similar Perfomance
S Harmer 0.42
K Gatepalli 0.42
R Uthappa 0.33
S Tanvir 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
K Sana -0.67
R Bopara -0.42
C Lynn -0.33
M Leask -0.14
I Souness -0.14

5 R Uthappa

WK
Similar Perfomance
S Tanvir 0.71
K Gatepalli 0.67
C Lynn 0.43
S Harmer 0.33
M Louis 0.33
L Julien 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
R Bopara -0.67
K Sana -0.43
I Souness -0.14

Best LAW Player Combinations

Best LAW Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
G Munsey WK LAW
R Ramesh BOW LAW
W Saleem AR LAW
T David BAT LAW
T Mills BOW LAW
R Raees BOW LAW
T Astle BOW LAW
S Eskinazi BAT LAW
A Rossington WK LAW
J Burns BAT LAW
S Al Hasan AR LAW
G Munsey
R Ramesh
W Saleem
T David
T Mills
R Raees
T Astle
S Eskinazi
A Rossington
J Burns
S Al Hasan
1
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
G Munsey
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
R Ramesh
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
W Saleem
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
T David
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
T Mills
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
R Raees
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
T Astle
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
S Eskinazi
Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
A Rossington
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
J Burns
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Munsey
2 player
S Al Hasan
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
G Munsey
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
R Ramesh
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
W Saleem
No Correlation
0
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
T David
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
T Mills
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
R Raees
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
T Astle
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
S Eskinazi
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
A Rossington
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
J Burns
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Ramesh
2 player
S Al Hasan
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
G Munsey
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
R Ramesh
No Correlation
1
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
W Saleem
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.67
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
T David
Negative Correlation
-0.71
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
T Mills
Negative Correlation
0.71
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
R Raees
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
T Astle
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
S Eskinazi
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
A Rossington
Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
J Burns
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
W Saleem
2 player
S Al Hasan
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
T David
2 player
G Munsey
No Correlation
0
1 player
T David
2 player
R Ramesh
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
T David
2 player
W Saleem
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
T David
2 player
T David
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
T David
2 player
T Mills
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
T David
2 player
R Raees
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
T David
2 player
T Astle
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
T David
2 player
S Eskinazi
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
T David
2 player
A Rossington
No Correlation
-1
1 player
T David
2 player
J Burns
Strong Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
T David
2 player
S Al Hasan
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Mills
2 player
G Munsey
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Mills
2 player
R Ramesh
No Correlation
-0.71
1 player
T Mills
2 player
W Saleem
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
T Mills
2 player
T David
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Mills
2 player
T Mills
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.43
1 player
T Mills
2 player
R Raees
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Mills
2 player
T Astle
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Mills
2 player
S Eskinazi
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Mills
2 player
A Rossington
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Mills
2 player
J Burns
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Mills
2 player
S Al Hasan
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
R Raees
2 player
G Munsey
Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
R Raees
2 player
R Ramesh
Negative Correlation
0.71
1 player
R Raees
2 player
W Saleem
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
R Raees
2 player
T David
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
R Raees
2 player
T Mills
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R Raees
2 player
R Raees
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Raees
2 player
T Astle
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Raees
2 player
S Eskinazi
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Raees
2 player
A Rossington
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
R Raees
2 player
J Burns
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Raees
2 player
S Al Hasan
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
T Astle
2 player
G Munsey
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
T Astle
2 player
R Ramesh
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Astle
2 player
W Saleem
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Astle
2 player
T David
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Astle
2 player
T Mills
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Astle
2 player
R Raees
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Astle
2 player
T Astle
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
T Astle
2 player
S Eskinazi
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
T Astle
2 player
A Rossington
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Astle
2 player
J Burns
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Astle
2 player
S Al Hasan
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
G Munsey
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
R Ramesh
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
W Saleem
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
T David
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
T Mills
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
R Raees
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
T Astle
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
S Eskinazi
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
A Rossington
Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
J Burns
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Eskinazi
2 player
S Al Hasan
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
G Munsey
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
R Ramesh
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
W Saleem
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
T David
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
T Mills
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
R Raees
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
T Astle
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
S Eskinazi
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
A Rossington
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
J Burns
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Rossington
2 player
S Al Hasan
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Burns
2 player
G Munsey
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Burns
2 player
R Ramesh
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
J Burns
2 player
W Saleem
Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
J Burns
2 player
T David
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Burns
2 player
T Mills
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Burns
2 player
R Raees
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Burns
2 player
T Astle
Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
J Burns
2 player
S Eskinazi
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Burns
2 player
A Rossington
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Burns
2 player
J Burns
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Burns
2 player
S Al Hasan
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
G Munsey
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
R Ramesh
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
W Saleem
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
T David
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
T Mills
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
R Raees
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
T Astle
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
S Eskinazi
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
A Rossington
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
J Burns
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Al Hasan
2 player
S Al Hasan
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick T Astle and S Al Hasan together
Positive Correlation

Pick W Saleem and T David together
Negative Correlation

Pick W Saleem and T Mills together
Negative Correlation

Pick T David and J Burns together
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick T Astle and J Burns together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Eskinazi and A Rossington together
Negative Correlation

Pick J Burns and S Al Hasan together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 T Mills

BOW
Similar Perfomance
T David 0.33
T Astle 0.14
A Rossington 0.14
S Al Hasan 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
W Saleem -0.71
R Raees -0.43
G Munsey -0.14
R Ramesh -0.14
S Eskinazi -0.14
J Burns -0.14

2 A Rossington

WK
Similar Perfomance
G Munsey 0.35
R Ramesh 0.23
T Astle 0.23
T David 0.14
T Mills 0.14
S Al Hasan 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
S Eskinazi -0.7
W Saleem -0.42
R Raees -0.14
J Burns -0.14

3 R Ramesh

BOW
Similar Perfomance
G Munsey 0.35
A Rossington 0.23
S Al Hasan 0.23
S Eskinazi 0.14
J Burns 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
R Raees -0.42
T Astle -0.35
W Saleem -0.14
T Mills -0.14

4 S Al Hasan

AR
Similar Perfomance
T David 0.7
T Astle 0.7
R Ramesh 0.23
T Mills 0.14
A Rossington 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
J Burns -0.7
W Saleem -0.42
R Raees -0.14
S Eskinazi -0.14

5 T David

BAT
Similar Perfomance
T Astle 0.7
S Al Hasan 0.7
T Mills 0.33
G Munsey 0.14
A Rossington 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
J Burns -1
W Saleem -0.67
R Raees -0.33
S Eskinazi -0.33

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved