Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
CH-W 04 Jan 05:10 am WB-W

Lineup Out

Saxton Oval
Women New Zealand T20 Domestic

Best Player Combinations For
CH-W vs WB-W

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

CH-W vs WB-W

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best CH-W Player Combinations

Best CH-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

No data found

Best WB-W Player Combinations

Best WB-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

No data found

Best CH-W Player Combinations

Best CH-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
F Devonshire AR CH-W
E McLeod BAT CH-W
H Armitage BAT CH-W
M Greig BAT CH-W
H Rowe AR CH-W
C Green BOW CH-W
G Atkinson BAT CH-W
R Mair BOW CH-W
T Newton BAT CH-W
K Gaging WK CH-W
O Bartlett BOW CH-W
F Devonshire
E McLeod
H Armitage
M Greig
H Rowe
C Green
G Atkinson
R Mair
T Newton
K Gaging
O Bartlett
1
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
F Devonshire
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
E McLeod
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
H Rowe
Negative Correlation
-0.3
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
C Green
Weak Negative Correlation
0.1
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
G Atkinson
No Correlation
-0.24
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
R Mair
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
K Gaging
Weak Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
O Bartlett
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
E McLeod
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
M Greig
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
H Rowe
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
C Green
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
G Atkinson
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
R Mair
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
T Newton
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
K Gaging
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
E McLeod
2 player
O Bartlett
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E McLeod
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
H Armitage
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
H Rowe
Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
-0.5
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
G Atkinson
Negative Correlation
0.54
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
R Mair
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Gaging
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Greig
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
M Greig
2 player
E McLeod
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
M Greig
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Greig
2 player
M Greig
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
M Greig
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
-0.52
1 player
M Greig
2 player
C Green
Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
M Greig
2 player
G Atkinson
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
M Greig
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
0
1 player
M Greig
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Greig
2 player
K Gaging
Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
M Greig
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
F Devonshire
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
E McLeod
Weak Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
H Rowe
Strong Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
-0.31
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
G Atkinson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.27
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
R Mair
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
K Gaging
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
O Bartlett
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
C Green
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Green
2 player
E McLeod
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.17
1 player
C Green
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
-0.52
1 player
C Green
2 player
M Greig
Negative Correlation
0.19
1 player
C Green
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Green
2 player
C Green
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
C Green
2 player
G Atkinson
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Green
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Green
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Green
2 player
K Gaging
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Green
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
E McLeod
Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
H Armitage
Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
-0.31
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
H Rowe
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
G Atkinson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
R Mair
Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
T Newton
Negative Correlation
0.56
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
K Gaging
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
O Bartlett
No Correlation
-0.24
1 player
R Mair
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
R Mair
2 player
E McLeod
Weak Negative Correlation
0.54
1 player
R Mair
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
R Mair
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
R Mair
2 player
H Rowe
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Mair
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
R Mair
2 player
G Atkinson
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R Mair
2 player
R Mair
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
R Mair
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Mair
2 player
K Gaging
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
R Mair
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
T Newton
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
T Newton
2 player
E McLeod
Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
T Newton
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Newton
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Newton
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Newton
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
T Newton
2 player
G Atkinson
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Newton
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Newton
2 player
T Newton
Strong Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
T Newton
2 player
K Gaging
Strong Negative Correlation
-0.42
1 player
T Newton
2 player
O Bartlett
Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
E McLeod
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
M Greig
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
0.56
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
G Atkinson
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
R Mair
Weak Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
T Newton
Strong Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
K Gaging
Strong Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
O Bartlett
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
E McLeod
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.38
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
M Greig
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
G Atkinson
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
R Mair
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
T Newton
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
K Gaging
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
O Bartlett
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick E McLeod and T Newton together
Positive Correlation

Pick H Armitage and H Rowe together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Gaging and O Bartlett together
Positive Correlation

Pick F Devonshire and H Rowe together
Negative Correlation

Pick E McLeod and G Atkinson together
Negative Correlation

Pick E McLeod and K Gaging together
Negative Correlation

Pick E McLeod and O Bartlett together
Negative Correlation

Pick T Newton and K Gaging together
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

Best WB-W Player Combinations

Best WB-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

No data found

More on PL Labs

CH-W vs WB-W

PerfectLineup © 2025. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only