Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
CH-W 06 Jan 05:10 am NS-W

Lineup Out

Saxton Oval
Women New Zealand T20 Domestic

Best Player Combinations For
CH-W vs NS-W

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

CH-W vs NS-W

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best CH-W Player Combinations

Best CH-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
F Devonshire AR CH-W
H Armitage BAT CH-W
E Cunningham BOW CH-W
M Greig BAT CH-W
H Rowe AR CH-W
C Green BOW CH-W
G Atkinson BAT CH-W
R Mair BOW CH-W
T Newton BAT CH-W
K Gaging WK CH-W
O Bartlett BOW CH-W
F Devonshire
H Armitage
E Cunningham
M Greig
H Rowe
C Green
G Atkinson
R Mair
T Newton
K Gaging
O Bartlett
1
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
F Devonshire
Strong Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.85
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
E Cunningham
Strong Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
M Greig
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.21
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
H Rowe
Weak Negative Correlation
0.22
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
G Atkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
K Gaging
Weak Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
O Bartlett
Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
H Armitage
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E Cunningham
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
M Greig
Weak Positive Correlation
0.46
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
H Rowe
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
G Atkinson
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
R Mair
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
T Newton
Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Gaging
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
O Bartlett
No Correlation
0.85
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
F Devonshire
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
E Cunningham
Strong Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
M Greig
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
H Rowe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
C Green
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
G Atkinson
Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
R Mair
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
T Newton
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
K Gaging
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
O Bartlett
Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
M Greig
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
M Greig
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
M Greig
2 player
E Cunningham
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Greig
2 player
M Greig
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Greig
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
M Greig
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
M Greig
2 player
G Atkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
M Greig
2 player
R Mair
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
M Greig
2 player
T Newton
Positive Correlation
0.54
1 player
M Greig
2 player
K Gaging
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
M Greig
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.21
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Negative Correlation
0.46
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
E Cunningham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
H Rowe
Strong Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
G Atkinson
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
R Mair
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
K Gaging
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
O Bartlett
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
C Green
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
C Green
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
C Green
2 player
E Cunningham
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
C Green
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Green
2 player
H Rowe
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Green
2 player
C Green
Strong Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
C Green
2 player
G Atkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
C Green
2 player
R Mair
Weak Positive Correlation
0.41
1 player
C Green
2 player
T Newton
Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
C Green
2 player
K Gaging
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
C Green
2 player
O Bartlett
Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
E Cunningham
Positive Correlation
0.37
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
M Greig
Weak Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
G Atkinson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
T Newton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
K Gaging
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
R Mair
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
R Mair
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
0.59
1 player
R Mair
2 player
E Cunningham
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
R Mair
2 player
M Greig
Weak Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
R Mair
2 player
H Rowe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
R Mair
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
R Mair
2 player
G Atkinson
No Correlation
1
1 player
R Mair
2 player
R Mair
Strong Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
R Mair
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
R Mair
2 player
K Gaging
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
R Mair
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Newton
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
0.41
1 player
T Newton
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
T Newton
2 player
E Cunningham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
T Newton
2 player
M Greig
Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Newton
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0.41
1 player
T Newton
2 player
C Green
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
T Newton
2 player
G Atkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
T Newton
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Newton
2 player
T Newton
Strong Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
T Newton
2 player
K Gaging
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
T Newton
2 player
O Bartlett
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
E Cunningham
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
M Greig
Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0.51
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
C Green
Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
G Atkinson
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
R Mair
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
T Newton
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
K Gaging
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
F Devonshire
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.62
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
E Cunningham
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
M Greig
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
C Green
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
G Atkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
R Mair
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
K Gaging
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
O Bartlett
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick F Devonshire and E Cunningham together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick E Cunningham and O Bartlett together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 H Rowe

AR
Similar Perfomance
H Armitage 0.46
R Mair 0.39
C Green 0.35
E Cunningham 0.22
G Atkinson 0.17
M Greig 0.14
T Newton 0.14
K Gaging 0.04
O Bartlett 0.01
Opposite Perfomance
F Devonshire -0.21

2 R Mair

BOW
Similar Perfomance
E Cunningham 0.59
H Rowe 0.39
H Armitage 0.33
C Green 0.32
O Bartlett 0.32
K Gaging 0.27
M Greig 0.2
T Newton 0.15
G Atkinson 0.07
F Devonshire 0.06

3 C Green

BOW
Similar Perfomance
K Gaging 0.51
E Cunningham 0.45
O Bartlett 0.42
T Newton 0.41
G Atkinson 0.38
H Rowe 0.35
R Mair 0.32
H Armitage 0.3
F Devonshire 0.22
M Greig 0.09

4 G Atkinson

BAT
Similar Perfomance
K Gaging 0.52
E Cunningham 0.47
C Green 0.38
M Greig 0.37
O Bartlett 0.34
F Devonshire 0.32
T Newton 0.22
H Rowe 0.17
H Armitage 0.15
R Mair 0.07

5 M Greig

BAT
Similar Perfomance
K Gaging 0.54
E Cunningham 0.48
T Newton 0.48
G Atkinson 0.37
H Armitage 0.32
F Devonshire 0.24
O Bartlett 0.21
R Mair 0.2
H Rowe 0.14
C Green 0.09

Best NS-W Player Combinations

Best NS-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
C Atapattu AR NS-W
M Downes BOW NS-W
A Wellington AR NS-W
J Watkin AR NS-W
M Lamplough BAT NS-W
N Patel AR NS-W
S Naidu BOW NS-W
H Topp WK NS-W
C Gurrey BAT NS-W
C Agafili BOW NS-W
C Atapattu
M Downes
A Wellington
J Watkin
M Lamplough
N Patel
S Naidu
H Topp
C Gurrey
C Agafili
1
1 player
C Atapattu
2 player
C Atapattu
Strong Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
C Atapattu
2 player
M Downes
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
C Atapattu
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Negative Correlation
0.55
1 player
C Atapattu
2 player
J Watkin
Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
C Atapattu
2 player
M Lamplough
No Correlation
0.41
1 player
C Atapattu
2 player
N Patel
Positive Correlation
-0.24
1 player
C Atapattu
2 player
S Naidu
Weak Negative Correlation
0.16
1 player
C Atapattu
2 player
H Topp
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
C Atapattu
2 player
C Gurrey
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
C Atapattu
2 player
C Agafili
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
M Downes
2 player
C Atapattu
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Downes
2 player
M Downes
Strong Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
M Downes
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Downes
2 player
J Watkin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
M Downes
2 player
M Lamplough
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
M Downes
2 player
N Patel
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Downes
2 player
S Naidu
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Downes
2 player
H Topp
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
M Downes
2 player
C Gurrey
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
M Downes
2 player
C Agafili
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
C Atapattu
Weak Negative Correlation
0.32
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
M Downes
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
A Wellington
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
J Watkin
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
M Lamplough
Weak Negative Correlation
0.52
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
N Patel
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
S Naidu
Weak Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
H Topp
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
C Gurrey
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
C Agafili
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
C Atapattu
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
M Downes
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.13
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
J Watkin
Strong Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
M Lamplough
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
N Patel
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
S Naidu
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
H Topp
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
C Gurrey
Weak Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
C Agafili
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
M Lamplough
2 player
C Atapattu
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
M Lamplough
2 player
M Downes
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Lamplough
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Negative Correlation
0.29
1 player
M Lamplough
2 player
J Watkin
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Lamplough
2 player
M Lamplough
Strong Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
M Lamplough
2 player
N Patel
Weak Positive Correlation
0.01
1 player
M Lamplough
2 player
S Naidu
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
M Lamplough
2 player
H Topp
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
M Lamplough
2 player
C Gurrey
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
M Lamplough
2 player
C Agafili
No Correlation
0.41
1 player
N Patel
2 player
C Atapattu
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
N Patel
2 player
M Downes
Weak Positive Correlation
0.52
1 player
N Patel
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
N Patel
2 player
J Watkin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
N Patel
2 player
M Lamplough
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
N Patel
2 player
N Patel
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
N Patel
2 player
S Naidu
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
N Patel
2 player
H Topp
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
N Patel
2 player
C Gurrey
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
N Patel
2 player
C Agafili
No Correlation
-0.24
1 player
S Naidu
2 player
C Atapattu
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Naidu
2 player
M Downes
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Naidu
2 player
A Wellington
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
S Naidu
2 player
J Watkin
No Correlation
0.01
1 player
S Naidu
2 player
M Lamplough
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
S Naidu
2 player
N Patel
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Naidu
2 player
S Naidu
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
S Naidu
2 player
H Topp
No Correlation
-0.31
1 player
S Naidu
2 player
C Gurrey
Weak Negative Correlation
0.35
1 player
S Naidu
2 player
C Agafili
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
H Topp
2 player
C Atapattu
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
H Topp
2 player
M Downes
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
H Topp
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
H Topp
2 player
J Watkin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
H Topp
2 player
M Lamplough
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
H Topp
2 player
N Patel
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
H Topp
2 player
S Naidu
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Topp
2 player
H Topp
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
H Topp
2 player
C Gurrey
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
H Topp
2 player
C Agafili
Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
C Gurrey
2 player
C Atapattu
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
C Gurrey
2 player
M Downes
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
C Gurrey
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
C Gurrey
2 player
J Watkin
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
C Gurrey
2 player
M Lamplough
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
C Gurrey
2 player
N Patel
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.31
1 player
C Gurrey
2 player
S Naidu
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Gurrey
2 player
H Topp
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Gurrey
2 player
C Gurrey
Strong Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
C Gurrey
2 player
C Agafili
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
C Agafili
2 player
C Atapattu
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
C Agafili
2 player
M Downes
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
C Agafili
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.09
1 player
C Agafili
2 player
J Watkin
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Agafili
2 player
M Lamplough
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
C Agafili
2 player
N Patel
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Agafili
2 player
S Naidu
Weak Positive Correlation
0.45
1 player
C Agafili
2 player
H Topp
Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
C Agafili
2 player
C Gurrey
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Agafili
2 player
C Agafili
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

High Performing Players

1 N Patel

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Wellington 0.52
C Atapattu 0.41
M Downes 0.35
M Lamplough 0.34
H Topp 0.33
J Watkin 0.3
C Gurrey 0.29
S Naidu 0.12
C Agafili 0.07

2 M Downes

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C Atapattu 0.45
J Watkin 0.35
N Patel 0.35
A Wellington 0.32
M Lamplough 0.28
C Gurrey 0.21
H Topp 0.11
C Agafili 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
S Naidu -0.14

3 C Atapattu

AR
Similar Perfomance
J Watkin 0.55
M Downes 0.45
N Patel 0.41
H Topp 0.16
C Gurrey 0.05
M Lamplough 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
A Wellington -0.4
S Naidu -0.24
C Agafili -0.17

4 J Watkin

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Atapattu 0.55
M Downes 0.35
C Gurrey 0.31
N Patel 0.3
M Lamplough 0.29
H Topp 0.21
C Agafili 0.09
S Naidu 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
A Wellington -0.13

5 C Gurrey

BAT
Similar Perfomance
M Lamplough 0.34
H Topp 0.33
J Watkin 0.31
N Patel 0.29
M Downes 0.21
A Wellington 0.1
C Agafili 0.07
C Atapattu 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
S Naidu -0.31

Best CH-W Player Combinations

Best CH-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
F Devonshire AR CH-W
H Armitage BAT CH-W
E Cunningham BOW CH-W
M Greig BAT CH-W
H Rowe AR CH-W
C Green BOW CH-W
G Atkinson BAT CH-W
R Mair BOW CH-W
T Newton BAT CH-W
K Gaging WK CH-W
O Bartlett BOW CH-W
F Devonshire
H Armitage
E Cunningham
M Greig
H Rowe
C Green
G Atkinson
R Mair
T Newton
K Gaging
O Bartlett
1
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
F Devonshire
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
E Cunningham
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
-0.67
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
H Rowe
Negative Correlation
-0.3
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
C Green
Weak Negative Correlation
0.05
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
G Atkinson
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
K Gaging
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
F Devonshire
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
H Armitage
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
E Cunningham
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
H Rowe
Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
G Atkinson
Negative Correlation
0.5
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
R Mair
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
T Newton
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
K Gaging
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Armitage
2 player
O Bartlett
No Correlation
0.35
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
1
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
E Cunningham
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.75
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
M Greig
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
H Rowe
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
G Atkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
R Mair
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
T Newton
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
K Gaging
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
E Cunningham
2 player
O Bartlett
Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
M Greig
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
M Greig
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
-0.75
1 player
M Greig
2 player
E Cunningham
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Greig
2 player
M Greig
Strong Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
M Greig
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
-0.52
1 player
M Greig
2 player
C Green
Negative Correlation
-0.17
1 player
M Greig
2 player
G Atkinson
No Correlation
-0.17
1 player
M Greig
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Greig
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
M Greig
2 player
K Gaging
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
M Greig
2 player
O Bartlett
Negative Correlation
-0.67
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
F Devonshire
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
E Cunningham
Weak Negative Correlation
0.04
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
H Rowe
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
-0.26
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
G Atkinson
Weak Negative Correlation
0.27
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
R Mair
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
K Gaging
No Correlation
-0.2
1 player
H Rowe
2 player
O Bartlett
No Correlation
-0.3
1 player
C Green
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.17
1 player
C Green
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
C Green
2 player
E Cunningham
No Correlation
-0.52
1 player
C Green
2 player
M Greig
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Green
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Green
2 player
C Green
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
C Green
2 player
G Atkinson
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Green
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Green
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
C Green
2 player
K Gaging
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Green
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
H Armitage
Negative Correlation
0.38
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
E Cunningham
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
-0.26
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
H Rowe
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.1
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
G Atkinson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.39
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
R Mair
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.54
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
T Newton
Negative Correlation
0.75
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
K Gaging
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
G Atkinson
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
R Mair
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
R Mair
2 player
H Armitage
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
R Mair
2 player
E Cunningham
Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
R Mair
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
R Mair
2 player
H Rowe
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Mair
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
-0.39
1 player
R Mair
2 player
G Atkinson
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
R Mair
2 player
R Mair
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
R Mair
2 player
T Newton
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
R Mair
2 player
K Gaging
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
R Mair
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.17
1 player
T Newton
2 player
F Devonshire
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
T Newton
2 player
H Armitage
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
T Newton
2 player
E Cunningham
Weak Negative Correlation
0.08
1 player
T Newton
2 player
M Greig
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Newton
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
T Newton
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
-0.54
1 player
T Newton
2 player
G Atkinson
Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
T Newton
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Newton
2 player
T Newton
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Newton
2 player
K Gaging
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
T Newton
2 player
O Bartlett
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
E Cunningham
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
M Greig
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
C Green
No Correlation
0.75
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
G Atkinson
Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
R Mair
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
T Newton
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
K Gaging
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Gaging
2 player
O Bartlett
Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
F Devonshire
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
H Armitage
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
E Cunningham
Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
M Greig
Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
H Rowe
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
C Green
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
G Atkinson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
R Mair
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
T Newton
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
K Gaging
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
O Bartlett
2 player
O Bartlett
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick H Armitage and H Rowe together
Positive Correlation

Pick G Atkinson and K Gaging together
Positive Correlation

Pick F Devonshire and H Rowe together
Negative Correlation

Pick E Cunningham and M Greig together
Negative Correlation

Pick T Newton and K Gaging together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 H Rowe

AR
Similar Perfomance
H Armitage 0.67
R Mair 0.27
C Green 0.14
M Greig 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
F Devonshire -0.67
G Atkinson -0.26
E Cunningham -0.23
O Bartlett -0.2

2 C Green

BOW
Similar Perfomance
O Bartlett 0.33
T Newton 0.14
H Rowe 0.14
K Gaging 0.11
E Cunningham 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
M Greig -0.52
F Devonshire -0.3
H Armitage -0.17
G Atkinson -0.1

3 R Mair

BOW
Similar Perfomance
H Armitage 0.5
E Cunningham 0.43
H Rowe 0.27
O Bartlett 0.27
K Gaging 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
G Atkinson -0.39
F Devonshire -0.2
M Greig -0.17
T Newton -0.08

4 M Greig

BAT
Similar Perfomance
K Gaging 0.33
T Newton 0.08
H Rowe 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
E Cunningham -0.75
C Green -0.52
O Bartlett -0.5
H Armitage -0.17
G Atkinson -0.17
R Mair -0.17
F Devonshire -0.1

5 H Armitage

BAT
Similar Perfomance
H Rowe 0.67
R Mair 0.5
T Newton 0.27
Opposite Perfomance
G Atkinson -0.45
F Devonshire -0.17
M Greig -0.17
C Green -0.17

Best NS-W Player Combinations

Best NS-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
C Atapattu AR NS-W
M Downes BOW NS-W
A Wellington AR NS-W
J Watkin AR NS-W
M Lamplough BAT NS-W
N Patel AR NS-W
S Naidu BOW NS-W
H Topp WK NS-W
C Gurrey BAT NS-W
C Agafili BOW NS-W
C Atapattu
M Downes
A Wellington
J Watkin
M Lamplough
N Patel
S Naidu
H Topp
C Gurrey
C Agafili
1
1 player
C Atapattu
2 player
C Atapattu
Strong Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Atapattu
2 player
M Downes
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Atapattu
2 player
A Wellington
Negative Correlation
0.6
1 player
C Atapattu
2 player
J Watkin
Positive Correlation
-0.56
1 player
C Atapattu
2 player
M Lamplough
Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Atapattu
2 player
N Patel
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
C Atapattu
2 player
S Naidu
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Atapattu
2 player
H Topp
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Atapattu
2 player
C Gurrey
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
C Atapattu
2 player
C Agafili
Weak Negative Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Downes
2 player
C Atapattu
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
M Downes
2 player
M Downes
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Downes
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
0.08
1 player
M Downes
2 player
J Watkin
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
M Downes
2 player
M Lamplough
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
M Downes
2 player
N Patel
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Downes
2 player
S Naidu
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Downes
2 player
H Topp
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Downes
2 player
C Gurrey
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
M Downes
2 player
C Agafili
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
C Atapattu
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
M Downes
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
A Wellington
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
J Watkin
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
M Lamplough
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
N Patel
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
S Naidu
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
H Topp
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
C Gurrey
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Wellington
2 player
C Agafili
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
C Atapattu
Positive Correlation
0.08
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
M Downes
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
A Wellington
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
J Watkin
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
M Lamplough
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
N Patel
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
S Naidu
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
H Topp
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
C Gurrey
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
J Watkin
2 player
C Agafili
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.56
1 player
M Lamplough
2 player
C Atapattu
Negative Correlation
0.17
1 player
M Lamplough
2 player
M Downes
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Lamplough
2 player
A Wellington
Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
M Lamplough
2 player
J Watkin
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Lamplough
2 player
M Lamplough
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Lamplough
2 player
N Patel
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
M Lamplough
2 player
S Naidu
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
M Lamplough
2 player
H Topp
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
M Lamplough
2 player
C Gurrey
Positive Correlation
-0.29
1 player
M Lamplough
2 player
C Agafili
Weak Negative Correlation
0.2
1 player
N Patel
2 player
C Atapattu
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
N Patel
2 player
M Downes
Weak Positive Correlation
0.67
1 player
N Patel
2 player
A Wellington
Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
N Patel
2 player
J Watkin
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
N Patel
2 player
M Lamplough
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Patel
2 player
N Patel
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
N Patel
2 player
S Naidu
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
N Patel
2 player
H Topp
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
N Patel
2 player
C Gurrey
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
N Patel
2 player
C Agafili
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Naidu
2 player
C Atapattu
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
S Naidu
2 player
M Downes
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Naidu
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
S Naidu
2 player
J Watkin
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Naidu
2 player
M Lamplough
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.11
1 player
S Naidu
2 player
N Patel
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Naidu
2 player
S Naidu
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.6
1 player
S Naidu
2 player
H Topp
Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
S Naidu
2 player
C Gurrey
Strong Negative Correlation
0.27
1 player
S Naidu
2 player
C Agafili
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
H Topp
2 player
C Atapattu
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
H Topp
2 player
M Downes
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
H Topp
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
H Topp
2 player
J Watkin
No Correlation
0
1 player
H Topp
2 player
M Lamplough
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
H Topp
2 player
N Patel
No Correlation
-0.6
1 player
H Topp
2 player
S Naidu
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
H Topp
2 player
H Topp
Strong Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
H Topp
2 player
C Gurrey
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
H Topp
2 player
C Agafili
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
C Gurrey
2 player
C Atapattu
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Gurrey
2 player
M Downes
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Gurrey
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
C Gurrey
2 player
J Watkin
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Gurrey
2 player
M Lamplough
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Gurrey
2 player
N Patel
Weak Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
C Gurrey
2 player
S Naidu
Strong Negative Correlation
0.47
1 player
C Gurrey
2 player
H Topp
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Gurrey
2 player
C Gurrey
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Gurrey
2 player
C Agafili
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
C Agafili
2 player
C Atapattu
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
C Agafili
2 player
M Downes
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Agafili
2 player
A Wellington
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
C Agafili
2 player
J Watkin
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.29
1 player
C Agafili
2 player
M Lamplough
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.22
1 player
C Agafili
2 player
N Patel
Weak Negative Correlation
0.27
1 player
C Agafili
2 player
S Naidu
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
C Agafili
2 player
H Topp
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
C Agafili
2 player
C Gurrey
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
C Agafili
2 player
C Agafili
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick C Atapattu and J Watkin together
Positive Correlation

Pick A Wellington and N Patel together
Positive Correlation

Pick C Atapattu and A Wellington together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Wellington and J Watkin together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Wellington and M Lamplough together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Naidu and H Topp together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Naidu and C Gurrey together
Strong Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 N Patel

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Wellington 0.67
M Downes 0.25
C Atapattu 0.2
C Gurrey 0.2
H Topp 0.18
M Lamplough 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
C Agafili -0.22
J Watkin -0.2
S Naidu -0.11

2 H Topp

WK
Similar Perfomance
C Gurrey 0.47
C Atapattu 0.2
N Patel 0.18
M Downes 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
S Naidu -0.6
C Agafili -0.25
A Wellington -0.14
J Watkin -0.07

3 J Watkin

AR
Similar Perfomance
C Atapattu 0.6
M Downes 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
A Wellington -0.7
M Lamplough -0.4
C Agafili -0.29
N Patel -0.2
S Naidu -0.11
C Gurrey -0.08
H Topp -0.07

4 M Downes

BOW
Similar Perfomance
C Atapattu 0.4
N Patel 0.25
M Lamplough 0.17
H Topp 0.14
C Gurrey 0.14
J Watkin 0.08
Opposite Perfomance
S Naidu -0.4
C Agafili -0.07

5 C Gurrey

BAT
Similar Perfomance
H Topp 0.47
M Lamplough 0.4
N Patel 0.2
M Downes 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
S Naidu -1
C Agafili -0.23
J Watkin -0.08

More on PL Labs

CH-W vs NS-W

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only