ATL 05 Oct 11:00 pm CHI

Lineup Out

University of Texas Dallas
National Cricket League T10

Best Player Combinations For
ATL vs CHI

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best ATL Player Combinations

Best ATL Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
N Jamali BOW ATL
S Chopra BOW ATL
B Russell BOW ATL
K Gadeela AR ATL
J Neesham AR ATL
A Mathews BAT ATL
T Moores WK ATL
T Bruce BAT ATL
D Aziz AR ATL
S Billings WK ATL
N Jamali
S Chopra
B Russell
K Gadeela
J Neesham
A Mathews
T Moores
T Bruce
D Aziz
S Billings
1
1 player
N Jamali
2 player
N Jamali
Strong Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
N Jamali
2 player
S Chopra
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
N Jamali
2 player
B Russell
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Jamali
2 player
K Gadeela
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
N Jamali
2 player
J Neesham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
N Jamali
2 player
A Mathews
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.35
1 player
N Jamali
2 player
T Moores
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.1
1 player
N Jamali
2 player
T Bruce
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
N Jamali
2 player
D Aziz
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
N Jamali
2 player
S Billings
Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
S Chopra
2 player
N Jamali
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Chopra
2 player
S Chopra
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
S Chopra
2 player
B Russell
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
S Chopra
2 player
K Gadeela
Weak Negative Correlation
0.31
1 player
S Chopra
2 player
J Neesham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
S Chopra
2 player
A Mathews
No Correlation
0.57
1 player
S Chopra
2 player
T Moores
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
S Chopra
2 player
T Bruce
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
S Chopra
2 player
D Aziz
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
S Chopra
2 player
S Billings
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
B Russell
2 player
N Jamali
Weak Negative Correlation
0.3
1 player
B Russell
2 player
S Chopra
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
B Russell
2 player
B Russell
Strong Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
B Russell
2 player
K Gadeela
Strong Negative Correlation
0.28
1 player
B Russell
2 player
J Neesham
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
B Russell
2 player
A Mathews
No Correlation
0.57
1 player
B Russell
2 player
T Moores
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
B Russell
2 player
T Bruce
Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
B Russell
2 player
D Aziz
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
B Russell
2 player
S Billings
Weak Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Gadeela
2 player
N Jamali
Positive Correlation
-0.4
1 player
K Gadeela
2 player
S Chopra
Weak Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
K Gadeela
2 player
B Russell
Strong Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K Gadeela
2 player
K Gadeela
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Gadeela
2 player
J Neesham
Negative Correlation
-0.4
1 player
K Gadeela
2 player
A Mathews
Weak Negative Correlation
-1
1 player
K Gadeela
2 player
T Moores
Strong Negative Correlation
0
1 player
K Gadeela
2 player
T Bruce
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
K Gadeela
2 player
D Aziz
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
K Gadeela
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
N Jamali
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
S Chopra
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
B Russell
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
K Gadeela
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
J Neesham
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
A Mathews
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
T Moores
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
T Bruce
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
D Aziz
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
S Billings
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Mathews
2 player
N Jamali
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Mathews
2 player
S Chopra
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
A Mathews
2 player
B Russell
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
A Mathews
2 player
K Gadeela
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.08
1 player
A Mathews
2 player
J Neesham
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Mathews
2 player
A Mathews
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.01
1 player
A Mathews
2 player
T Moores
No Correlation
-0.04
1 player
A Mathews
2 player
T Bruce
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
A Mathews
2 player
D Aziz
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
A Mathews
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
T Moores
2 player
N Jamali
Weak Negative Correlation
0.57
1 player
T Moores
2 player
S Chopra
Positive Correlation
0.57
1 player
T Moores
2 player
B Russell
Positive Correlation
-1
1 player
T Moores
2 player
K Gadeela
Strong Negative Correlation
0.04
1 player
T Moores
2 player
J Neesham
No Correlation
-0.01
1 player
T Moores
2 player
A Mathews
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Moores
2 player
T Moores
Strong Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
T Moores
2 player
T Bruce
Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
T Moores
2 player
D Aziz
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
T Moores
2 player
S Billings
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
N Jamali
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
S Chopra
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
B Russell
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
K Gadeela
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
J Neesham
Positive Correlation
-0.04
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
A Mathews
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
T Moores
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
T Bruce
Strong Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
D Aziz
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
S Billings
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
D Aziz
2 player
N Jamali
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
D Aziz
2 player
S Chopra
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
D Aziz
2 player
B Russell
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
D Aziz
2 player
K Gadeela
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
D Aziz
2 player
J Neesham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
D Aziz
2 player
A Mathews
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
D Aziz
2 player
T Moores
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
D Aziz
2 player
T Bruce
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Aziz
2 player
D Aziz
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
D Aziz
2 player
S Billings
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
S Billings
2 player
N Jamali
Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
S Billings
2 player
S Chopra
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
S Billings
2 player
B Russell
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Billings
2 player
K Gadeela
No Correlation
0.31
1 player
S Billings
2 player
J Neesham
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
S Billings
2 player
A Mathews
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
S Billings
2 player
T Moores
Weak Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
S Billings
2 player
T Bruce
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
S Billings
2 player
D Aziz
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Billings
2 player
S Billings
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick N Jamali and K Gadeela together
Positive Correlation

Don’t Pick B Russell and K Gadeela together
Strong Negative Correlation

Don’t Pick K Gadeela and J Neesham together
Negative Correlation

Don’t Pick K Gadeela and T Moores together
Strong Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 A Mathews

BAT
Similar Perfomance
D Aziz 0.24
N Jamali 0.23
S Chopra 0.11
S Billings 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
K Gadeela -0.4
J Neesham -0.08
T Bruce -0.04
B Russell -0.01
T Moores -0.01

2 S Billings

WK
Similar Perfomance
N Jamali 0.5
T Bruce 0.35
J Neesham 0.31
S Chopra 0.28
D Aziz 0.26
T Moores 0.24
B Russell 0.22
A Mathews 0.05

3 B Russell

BOW
Similar Perfomance
T Moores 0.57
T Bruce 0.4
S Chopra 0.3
J Neesham 0.28
S Billings 0.22
Opposite Perfomance
K Gadeela -1
N Jamali -0.23
D Aziz -0.12
A Mathews -0.01

4 J Neesham

AR
Similar Perfomance
T Bruce 0.4
S Chopra 0.31
S Billings 0.31
D Aziz 0.29
B Russell 0.28
N Jamali 0.2
T Moores 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
K Gadeela -0.7
A Mathews -0.08

5 T Bruce

BAT
Similar Perfomance
T Moores 0.5
D Aziz 0.44
B Russell 0.4
J Neesham 0.4
S Billings 0.35
S Chopra 0.28
Opposite Perfomance
N Jamali -0.1
A Mathews -0.04

Best CHI Player Combinations

Best CHI Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
M Leask AR CHI
C Lynn BAT CHI
R Uthappa WK CHI
K Gatepalli BOW CHI
Rehman Qaiser BOW CHI
I Souness AR CHI
L Julien WK CHI
S Harmer AR CHI
K Sana BOW CHI
R Bopara AR CHI
S Tanvir BOW CHI
M Leask
C Lynn
R Uthappa
K Gatepalli
Rehman Qaiser
I Souness
L Julien
S Harmer
K Sana
R Bopara
S Tanvir
1
1 player
M Leask
2 player
M Leask
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
M Leask
2 player
C Lynn
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
M Leask
2 player
R Uthappa
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
M Leask
2 player
K Gatepalli
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
M Leask
2 player
Rehman Qaiser
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
M Leask
2 player
I Souness
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
M Leask
2 player
L Julien
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
M Leask
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
M Leask
2 player
K Sana
Weak Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
M Leask
2 player
R Bopara
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
M Leask
2 player
S Tanvir
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
M Leask
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
C Lynn
Strong Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
R Uthappa
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
K Gatepalli
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
Rehman Qaiser
Negative Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
I Souness
Weak Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
L Julien
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
K Sana
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
R Bopara
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
C Lynn
2 player
S Tanvir
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
M Leask
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
C Lynn
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
R Uthappa
Strong Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
K Gatepalli
Positive Correlation
-0.28
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
Rehman Qaiser
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
I Souness
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
L Julien
Positive Correlation
0.06
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.21
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
K Sana
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
R Bopara
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
R Uthappa
2 player
S Tanvir
Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
M Leask
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
C Lynn
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
R Uthappa
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
K Gatepalli
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
Rehman Qaiser
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
I Souness
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
L Julien
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
S Harmer
Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
K Sana
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
R Bopara
No Correlation
0.48
1 player
K Gatepalli
2 player
S Tanvir
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
Rehman Qaiser
2 player
M Leask
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
Rehman Qaiser
2 player
C Lynn
Negative Correlation
-0.28
1 player
Rehman Qaiser
2 player
R Uthappa
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
Rehman Qaiser
2 player
K Gatepalli
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
Rehman Qaiser
2 player
Rehman Qaiser
Strong Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
Rehman Qaiser
2 player
I Souness
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
Rehman Qaiser
2 player
L Julien
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
Rehman Qaiser
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
Rehman Qaiser
2 player
K Sana
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
Rehman Qaiser
2 player
R Bopara
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
Rehman Qaiser
2 player
S Tanvir
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
I Souness
2 player
M Leask
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
I Souness
2 player
C Lynn
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
I Souness
2 player
R Uthappa
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
I Souness
2 player
K Gatepalli
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
I Souness
2 player
Rehman Qaiser
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
I Souness
2 player
I Souness
Strong Positive Correlation
0.12
1 player
I Souness
2 player
L Julien
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
I Souness
2 player
S Harmer
Weak Negative Correlation
0.6
1 player
I Souness
2 player
K Sana
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
I Souness
2 player
R Bopara
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
I Souness
2 player
S Tanvir
No Correlation
-0.1
1 player
L Julien
2 player
M Leask
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
L Julien
2 player
C Lynn
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
L Julien
2 player
R Uthappa
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
L Julien
2 player
K Gatepalli
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
L Julien
2 player
Rehman Qaiser
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
L Julien
2 player
I Souness
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Julien
2 player
L Julien
Strong Positive Correlation
0.16
1 player
L Julien
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
L Julien
2 player
K Sana
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
L Julien
2 player
R Bopara
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
L Julien
2 player
S Tanvir
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
M Leask
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
C Lynn
No Correlation
0.06
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
R Uthappa
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
K Gatepalli
Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
Rehman Qaiser
No Correlation
-0.4
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
I Souness
Weak Negative Correlation
0.16
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
L Julien
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
S Harmer
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
K Sana
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
R Bopara
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
S Harmer
2 player
S Tanvir
Weak Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
K Sana
2 player
M Leask
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
K Sana
2 player
C Lynn
Weak Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
K Sana
2 player
R Uthappa
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.05
1 player
K Sana
2 player
K Gatepalli
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
K Sana
2 player
Rehman Qaiser
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
K Sana
2 player
I Souness
Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
K Sana
2 player
L Julien
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.1
1 player
K Sana
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
1
1 player
K Sana
2 player
K Sana
Strong Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
K Sana
2 player
R Bopara
Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
K Sana
2 player
S Tanvir
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
M Leask
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
C Lynn
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
R Uthappa
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
K Gatepalli
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
Rehman Qaiser
Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
I Souness
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
L Julien
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
S Harmer
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
K Sana
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
R Bopara
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.07
1 player
R Bopara
2 player
S Tanvir
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
M Leask
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
C Lynn
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
R Uthappa
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
K Gatepalli
Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
Rehman Qaiser
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
I Souness
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
L Julien
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
S Harmer
Weak Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
K Sana
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
R Bopara
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Tanvir
2 player
S Tanvir
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick R Uthappa and S Tanvir together
Positive Correlation

Pick I Souness and K Sana together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Sana and R Bopara together
Positive Correlation

Don’t pick C Lynn and Rehman Qaiser in the same lineup
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 K Gatepalli

BOW
Similar Perfomance
S Tanvir 0.48
R Uthappa 0.42
L Julien 0.42
C Lynn 0.4
S Harmer 0.4
R Bopara 0.12
M Leask 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
Rehman Qaiser -0.33
I Souness -0.2
K Sana -0.05

2 S Harmer

AR
Similar Perfomance
K Gatepalli 0.4
S Tanvir 0.39
L Julien 0.16
M Leask 0.1
C Lynn 0.06
R Uthappa 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
I Souness -0.4
Rehman Qaiser -0.1
K Sana -0.1

3 R Uthappa

WK
Similar Perfomance
S Tanvir 0.6
C Lynn 0.47
L Julien 0.43
K Gatepalli 0.42
I Souness 0.23
K Sana 0.21
M Leask 0.19
S Harmer 0.06
R Bopara 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
Rehman Qaiser -0.28

4 C Lynn

BAT
Similar Perfomance
R Uthappa 0.47
K Gatepalli 0.4
I Souness 0.28
K Sana 0.2
R Bopara 0.18
L Julien 0.16
S Tanvir 0.13
S Harmer 0.06
Opposite Perfomance
Rehman Qaiser -0.7
M Leask -0.1

5 S Tanvir

BOW
Similar Perfomance
R Uthappa 0.6
K Gatepalli 0.48
L Julien 0.4
S Harmer 0.39
M Leask 0.34
Rehman Qaiser 0.15
C Lynn 0.13
K Sana 0.04
Opposite Perfomance
R Bopara -0.07

Best ATL Player Combinations

Best ATL Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad
N Jamali BOW ATL
S Chopra BOW ATL
B Russell BOW ATL
K Gadeela AR ATL
J Neesham AR ATL
A Mathews BAT ATL
T Moores WK ATL
T Bruce BAT ATL
D Aziz AR ATL
S Billings WK ATL
N Jamali
S Chopra
B Russell
K Gadeela
J Neesham
A Mathews
T Moores
T Bruce
D Aziz
S Billings
1
1 player
N Jamali
2 player
N Jamali
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
N Jamali
2 player
S Chopra
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N Jamali
2 player
B Russell
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Jamali
2 player
K Gadeela
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
N Jamali
2 player
J Neesham
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
N Jamali
2 player
A Mathews
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N Jamali
2 player
T Moores
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
N Jamali
2 player
T Bruce
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
N Jamali
2 player
D Aziz
Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
N Jamali
2 player
S Billings
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Chopra
2 player
N Jamali
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
S Chopra
2 player
S Chopra
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Chopra
2 player
B Russell
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Chopra
2 player
K Gadeela
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
S Chopra
2 player
J Neesham
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Chopra
2 player
A Mathews
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Chopra
2 player
T Moores
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Chopra
2 player
T Bruce
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Chopra
2 player
D Aziz
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Chopra
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Russell
2 player
N Jamali
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B Russell
2 player
S Chopra
No Correlation
1
1 player
B Russell
2 player
B Russell
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
B Russell
2 player
K Gadeela
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
B Russell
2 player
J Neesham
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
B Russell
2 player
A Mathews
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
B Russell
2 player
T Moores
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
B Russell
2 player
T Bruce
Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
B Russell
2 player
D Aziz
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
B Russell
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Gadeela
2 player
N Jamali
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Gadeela
2 player
S Chopra
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Gadeela
2 player
B Russell
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
K Gadeela
2 player
K Gadeela
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Gadeela
2 player
J Neesham
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Gadeela
2 player
A Mathews
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Gadeela
2 player
T Moores
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Gadeela
2 player
T Bruce
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
K Gadeela
2 player
D Aziz
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
K Gadeela
2 player
S Billings
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
N Jamali
Weak Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
S Chopra
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
B Russell
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
K Gadeela
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
J Neesham
Strong Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
A Mathews
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
T Moores
No Correlation
0.67
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
T Bruce
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
D Aziz
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
J Neesham
2 player
S Billings
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Mathews
2 player
N Jamali
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Mathews
2 player
S Chopra
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Mathews
2 player
B Russell
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Mathews
2 player
K Gadeela
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
A Mathews
2 player
J Neesham
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Mathews
2 player
A Mathews
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Mathews
2 player
T Moores
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Mathews
2 player
T Bruce
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Mathews
2 player
D Aziz
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
A Mathews
2 player
S Billings
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Moores
2 player
N Jamali
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
T Moores
2 player
S Chopra
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
T Moores
2 player
B Russell
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Moores
2 player
K Gadeela
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Moores
2 player
J Neesham
No Correlation
0
1 player
T Moores
2 player
A Mathews
No Correlation
1
1 player
T Moores
2 player
T Moores
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
T Moores
2 player
T Bruce
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
T Moores
2 player
D Aziz
Weak Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
T Moores
2 player
S Billings
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
N Jamali
Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
S Chopra
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
B Russell
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
K Gadeela
Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
J Neesham
Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
A Mathews
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
T Moores
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
T Bruce
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
D Aziz
Weak Positive Correlation
0.71
1 player
T Bruce
2 player
S Billings
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
D Aziz
2 player
N Jamali
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Aziz
2 player
S Chopra
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
D Aziz
2 player
B Russell
Weak Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
D Aziz
2 player
K Gadeela
Positive Correlation
0.42
1 player
D Aziz
2 player
J Neesham
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Aziz
2 player
A Mathews
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
D Aziz
2 player
T Moores
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
D Aziz
2 player
T Bruce
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
D Aziz
2 player
D Aziz
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
D Aziz
2 player
S Billings
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
S Billings
2 player
N Jamali
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
S Billings
2 player
S Chopra
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Billings
2 player
B Russell
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
S Billings
2 player
K Gadeela
Negative Correlation
0.43
1 player
S Billings
2 player
J Neesham
Positive Correlation
-0.25
1 player
S Billings
2 player
A Mathews
Weak Negative Correlation
0.67
1 player
S Billings
2 player
T Moores
Positive Correlation
0.71
1 player
S Billings
2 player
T Bruce
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Billings
2 player
D Aziz
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Billings
2 player
S Billings
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick N Jamali and D Aziz together
Positive Correlation

Pick K Gadeela and D Aziz together
Positive Correlation

Pick J Neesham and T Bruce together
Positive Correlation

Pick T Moores and S Billings together
Positive Correlation

Pick T Bruce and S Billings together
Positive Correlation

Pick N Jamali and B Russell together
Negative Correlation

Pick N Jamali and T Moores together
Negative Correlation

Pick N Jamali and T Bruce together
Negative Correlation

Pick S Chopra and K Gadeela together
Negative Correlation

Pick K Gadeela and A Mathews together
Negative Correlation

Pick K Gadeela and T Bruce together
Negative Correlation

Pick K Gadeela and S Billings together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 S Billings

WK
Similar Perfomance
T Bruce 0.71
T Moores 0.67
J Neesham 0.43
Opposite Perfomance
K Gadeela -0.7
A Mathews -0.25
N Jamali -0.23

2 T Bruce

BAT
Similar Perfomance
S Billings 0.71
J Neesham 0.67
B Russell 0.43
T Moores 0.33
D Aziz 0.33
Opposite Perfomance
N Jamali -0.7
K Gadeela -0.7
S Chopra -0.14
A Mathews -0.14

3 A Mathews

BAT
Similar Perfomance
N Jamali 0.23
J Neesham 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
K Gadeela -0.7
S Chopra -0.25
B Russell -0.25
S Billings -0.25
T Bruce -0.14

4 J Neesham

AR
Similar Perfomance
T Bruce 0.67
S Billings 0.43
D Aziz 0.42
S Chopra 0.14
B Russell 0.14
A Mathews 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
K Gadeela -0.7
N Jamali -0.23
T Moores -0.14

5 B Russell

BOW
Similar Perfomance
T Bruce 0.43
T Moores 0.33
J Neesham 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
N Jamali -0.7
K Gadeela -0.7
D Aziz -0.33
A Mathews -0.25

Best CHI Player Combinations

Best CHI Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Full Squad

No data found

No data found

High Performing Players

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved