Upcoming
Fixtures
View All
AM-W 22 Dec 04:30 am QUN-W

Lineup Out

Phillip Oval
Womens National Cricket League

Best Player Combinations For
AM-W vs QUN-W

How it Works?

This guide is super useful for identifying player combinations that are likely to score big. Use the filters to identify the best player combinations according to specific match scenarios.

Player correlate positively

Both players generally perform similarly when picked together. They either score high together or score low together. Maximise FPts by picking players that correlate positively with top players.

Player correlate negatively

Both players generally perform in an opposite manner. If one player scores high, the other usually scores low. Avoid picking players that correlate negatively with top player

More on PL Labs

AM-W vs QUN-W

Show Player Combinations on the basis of:

Best AM-W Player Combinations

Best AM-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
G Dignam AR AM-W
K Mack BAT AM-W
H Ferling BOW AM-W
C Leeson AR AM-W
O Porter BAT AM-W
Z Cooke BOW AM-W
A Genford BOW AM-W
A Mushangwe BOW AM-W
G Lyons WK AM-W
A Wikman BAT AM-W
G Dignam
K Mack
H Ferling
C Leeson
O Porter
Z Cooke
A Genford
A Mushangwe
G Lyons
A Wikman
1
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
G Dignam
Strong Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
K Mack
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
H Ferling
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
C Leeson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
O Porter
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
Z Cooke
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
A Genford
Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
A Mushangwe
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
G Lyons
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
A Wikman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
K Mack
2 player
G Dignam
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Mack
2 player
K Mack
Strong Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
K Mack
2 player
H Ferling
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
K Mack
2 player
C Leeson
No Correlation
0.18
1 player
K Mack
2 player
O Porter
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
K Mack
2 player
Z Cooke
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
K Mack
2 player
A Genford
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
K Mack
2 player
A Mushangwe
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
K Mack
2 player
G Lyons
Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
K Mack
2 player
A Wikman
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
G Dignam
Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
1
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
H Ferling
Strong Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
C Leeson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.5
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
O Porter
Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
Z Cooke
Positive Correlation
0.04
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
A Genford
No Correlation
0.47
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
A Mushangwe
Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
G Lyons
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
A Wikman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
C Leeson
2 player
G Dignam
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
C Leeson
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
C Leeson
2 player
H Ferling
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Leeson
2 player
C Leeson
Strong Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
C Leeson
2 player
O Porter
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
C Leeson
2 player
Z Cooke
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
C Leeson
2 player
A Genford
No Correlation
-0.47
1 player
C Leeson
2 player
A Mushangwe
Negative Correlation
0.07
1 player
C Leeson
2 player
G Lyons
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
C Leeson
2 player
A Wikman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
O Porter
2 player
G Dignam
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
O Porter
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
O Porter
2 player
H Ferling
Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
O Porter
2 player
C Leeson
No Correlation
1
1 player
O Porter
2 player
O Porter
Strong Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
O Porter
2 player
Z Cooke
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
O Porter
2 player
A Genford
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
O Porter
2 player
A Mushangwe
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
O Porter
2 player
G Lyons
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
O Porter
2 player
A Wikman
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
G Dignam
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
K Mack
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
H Ferling
Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
C Leeson
No Correlation
0.25
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
O Porter
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
Z Cooke
Strong Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
A Genford
Weak Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
A Mushangwe
Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
G Lyons
No Correlation
0.07
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
A Wikman
No Correlation
0.5
1 player
A Genford
2 player
G Dignam
Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
A Genford
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
0.04
1 player
A Genford
2 player
H Ferling
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
A Genford
2 player
C Leeson
No Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Genford
2 player
O Porter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Genford
2 player
Z Cooke
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Genford
2 player
A Genford
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Genford
2 player
A Mushangwe
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
A Genford
2 player
G Lyons
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
A Genford
2 player
A Wikman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
G Dignam
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
K Mack
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
H Ferling
Positive Correlation
-0.47
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
C Leeson
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
O Porter
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
Z Cooke
Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
A Genford
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
A Mushangwe
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
G Lyons
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
A Wikman
No Correlation
0.34
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
G Dignam
Weak Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
K Mack
Positive Correlation
0.51
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
H Ferling
Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
C Leeson
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
O Porter
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
Z Cooke
No Correlation
0.37
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
A Genford
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
A Mushangwe
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
G Lyons
Strong Positive Correlation
0.32
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
A Wikman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
G Dignam
Weak Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
H Ferling
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
C Leeson
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
O Porter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
Z Cooke
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
A Genford
Weak Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
A Mushangwe
No Correlation
0.32
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
G Lyons
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
A Wikman
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick Z Cooke and A Mushangwe together
Positive Correlation

High Performing Players

1 C Leeson

AR
Similar Perfomance
A Wikman 0.27
H Ferling 0.24
G Dignam 0.22
K Mack 0.14
G Lyons 0.07
O Porter 0.05
Z Cooke 0.03
A Genford 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
A Mushangwe -0.47

2 K Mack

BAT
Similar Perfomance
G Dignam 0.43
G Lyons 0.4
A Mushangwe 0.23
Z Cooke 0.22
H Ferling 0.18
O Porter 0.18
C Leeson 0.14
A Genford 0.13
A Wikman 0.05

3 Z Cooke

BOW
Similar Perfomance
A Mushangwe 0.6
H Ferling 0.48
O Porter 0.25
K Mack 0.22
A Genford 0.2
A Wikman 0.07
C Leeson 0.03
G Lyons 0.03
Opposite Perfomance
G Dignam -0.03

4 H Ferling

BOW
Similar Perfomance
G Lyons 0.51
O Porter 0.5
Z Cooke 0.48
A Mushangwe 0.47
G Dignam 0.43
A Wikman 0.39
C Leeson 0.24
K Mack 0.18
A Genford 0.04

5 A Wikman

BAT
Similar Perfomance
H Ferling 0.39
G Dignam 0.38
G Lyons 0.32
C Leeson 0.27
O Porter 0.26
A Genford 0.26
Z Cooke 0.07
K Mack 0.05
A Mushangwe 0.03

Best QUN-W Player Combinations

Best QUN-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
L Winfield-Hill WK QUN-W
L Hamilton BOW QUN-W
S Ginger AR QUN-W
M Wrigley WK QUN-W
G Redmayne WK QUN-W
N Hancock BOW QUN-W
G Harris AR QUN-W
C Sippel BOW QUN-W
C Knott AR QUN-W
L Harris BAT QUN-W
J Jonassen AR QUN-W
L Winfield-Hill
L Hamilton
S Ginger
M Wrigley
G Redmayne
N Hancock
G Harris
C Sippel
C Knott
L Harris
J Jonassen
1
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Strong Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
L Hamilton
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
S Ginger
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
M Wrigley
No Correlation
0.45
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
G Redmayne
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
0
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
0.55
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
C Sippel
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
L Harris
Positive Correlation
0.22
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.53
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
L Hamilton
Strong Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
S Ginger
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.02
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
M Wrigley
No Correlation
0.44
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
G Redmayne
Positive Correlation
0.24
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
N Hancock
Weak Positive Correlation
0.13
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
0.6
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
C Sippel
Positive Correlation
0.66
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
C Knott
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
L Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
J Jonassen
Positive Correlation
0.34
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.3
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
L Hamilton
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
S Ginger
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.16
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
M Wrigley
No Correlation
0.39
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
0.1
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
C Sippel
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
0.15
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
-0.02
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
-0.16
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
S Ginger
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
M Wrigley
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
1
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
G Harris
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
C Sippel
Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
C Knott
Weak Negative Correlation
0.82
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
L Harris
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.62
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
J Jonassen
Negative Correlation
0.45
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Positive Correlation
0.44
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
L Hamilton
Positive Correlation
0.39
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
S Ginger
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
M Wrigley
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
G Redmayne
Strong Positive Correlation
0.17
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
0.36
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
G Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
C Sippel
Positive Correlation
0.09
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
0.03
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0.24
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
L Hamilton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.18
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
S Ginger
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
M Wrigley
No Correlation
0.17
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
N Hancock
Strong Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
G Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
C Sippel
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.02
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
-0.03
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
J Jonassen
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Harris
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0.13
1 player
G Harris
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
0.16
1 player
G Harris
2 player
S Ginger
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Harris
2 player
M Wrigley
Strong Positive Correlation
0.36
1 player
G Harris
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.31
1 player
G Harris
2 player
N Hancock
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
G Harris
2 player
G Harris
Strong Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
G Harris
2 player
C Sippel
Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
G Harris
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
G Harris
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
G Harris
2 player
J Jonassen
Positive Correlation
0.55
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Positive Correlation
0.6
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
L Hamilton
Positive Correlation
0.1
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
S Ginger
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
M Wrigley
Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
G Redmayne
Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
0.43
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
G Harris
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
C Sippel
Strong Positive Correlation
0.38
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.28
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
L Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
J Jonassen
Positive Correlation
0.35
1 player
C Knott
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.66
1 player
C Knott
2 player
L Hamilton
Positive Correlation
0.19
1 player
C Knott
2 player
S Ginger
No Correlation
-0.22
1 player
C Knott
2 player
M Wrigley
Weak Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
C Knott
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
0.26
1 player
C Knott
2 player
N Hancock
Weak Positive Correlation
0.07
1 player
C Knott
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
0.38
1 player
C Knott
2 player
C Sippel
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Knott
2 player
C Knott
Strong Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
C Knott
2 player
L Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
C Knott
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.48
1 player
L Harris
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Positive Correlation
0.21
1 player
L Harris
2 player
L Hamilton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.15
1 player
L Harris
2 player
S Ginger
No Correlation
0.82
1 player
L Harris
2 player
M Wrigley
Strong Positive Correlation
0.03
1 player
L Harris
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
0.02
1 player
L Harris
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
0.19
1 player
L Harris
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
0.28
1 player
L Harris
2 player
C Sippel
Weak Positive Correlation
0.26
1 player
L Harris
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
L Harris
2 player
L Harris
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
L Harris
2 player
J Jonassen
No Correlation
0.22
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.47
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
L Hamilton
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
S Ginger
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.62
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
M Wrigley
Negative Correlation
0.27
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.03
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
0.54
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
G Harris
Positive Correlation
0.43
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
C Sippel
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.15
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
1
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
J Jonassen
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick L Hamilton and C Sippel together
Positive Correlation

Pick L Hamilton and C Knott together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Wrigley and G Harris together
Strong Positive Correlation

Pick M Wrigley and C Sippel together
Positive Correlation

Pick M Wrigley and L Harris together
Strong Positive Correlation

Don’t pick M Wrigley and J Jonassen in the same lineup
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 C Knott

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Hamilton 0.66
C Sippel 0.38
L Winfield-Hill 0.35
J Jonassen 0.27
N Hancock 0.26
L Harris 0.26
S Ginger 0.19
G Redmayne 0.09
G Harris 0.07
Opposite Perfomance
M Wrigley -0.22

2 J Jonassen

AR
Similar Perfomance
G Harris 0.54
L Hamilton 0.47
C Sippel 0.43
G Redmayne 0.27
C Knott 0.27
L Winfield-Hill 0.22
S Ginger 0.2
Opposite Perfomance
M Wrigley -0.62
L Harris -0.15
N Hancock -0.03

3 C Sippel

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Wrigley 0.7
L Hamilton 0.6
L Winfield-Hill 0.55
G Redmayne 0.47
G Harris 0.43
J Jonassen 0.43
C Knott 0.38
L Harris 0.28
N Hancock 0.19
S Ginger 0.1

4 G Redmayne

WK
Similar Perfomance
C Sippel 0.47
L Winfield-Hill 0.45
L Hamilton 0.44
S Ginger 0.39
G Harris 0.36
J Jonassen 0.27
N Hancock 0.17
C Knott 0.09
L Harris 0.03

5 N Hancock

BOW
Similar Perfomance
G Harris 0.31
C Knott 0.26
L Hamilton 0.24
C Sippel 0.19
S Ginger 0.18
G Redmayne 0.17
M Wrigley 0.14
L Winfield-Hill 0.1
L Harris 0.02
Opposite Perfomance
J Jonassen -0.03

Best AM-W Player Combinations

Best AM-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
G Dignam AR AM-W
K Mack BAT AM-W
H Ferling BOW AM-W
C Leeson AR AM-W
O Porter BAT AM-W
Z Cooke BOW AM-W
A Genford BOW AM-W
A Mushangwe BOW AM-W
G Lyons WK AM-W
A Wikman BAT AM-W
G Dignam
K Mack
H Ferling
C Leeson
O Porter
Z Cooke
A Genford
A Mushangwe
G Lyons
A Wikman
1
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
G Dignam
Strong Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
K Mack
Positive Correlation
-0.11
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
H Ferling
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
C Leeson
No Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
O Porter
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
Z Cooke
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
A Genford
Weak Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
A Mushangwe
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.5
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
G Lyons
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Dignam
2 player
A Wikman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.56
1 player
K Mack
2 player
G Dignam
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
K Mack
2 player
K Mack
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.36
1 player
K Mack
2 player
H Ferling
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
K Mack
2 player
C Leeson
No Correlation
-0.16
1 player
K Mack
2 player
O Porter
No Correlation
0.12
1 player
K Mack
2 player
Z Cooke
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
K Mack
2 player
A Genford
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
K Mack
2 player
A Mushangwe
Weak Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
K Mack
2 player
G Lyons
No Correlation
-0.12
1 player
K Mack
2 player
A Wikman
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
G Dignam
No Correlation
-0.36
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
K Mack
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
H Ferling
Strong Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
C Leeson
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
O Porter
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
Z Cooke
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
A Genford
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
A Mushangwe
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
G Lyons
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
H Ferling
2 player
A Wikman
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Leeson
2 player
G Dignam
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
C Leeson
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
C Leeson
2 player
H Ferling
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Leeson
2 player
C Leeson
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
C Leeson
2 player
O Porter
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
C Leeson
2 player
Z Cooke
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Leeson
2 player
A Genford
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Leeson
2 player
A Mushangwe
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
C Leeson
2 player
G Lyons
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.29
1 player
C Leeson
2 player
A Wikman
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
O Porter
2 player
G Dignam
Negative Correlation
-0.16
1 player
O Porter
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
0.27
1 player
O Porter
2 player
H Ferling
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
O Porter
2 player
C Leeson
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
O Porter
2 player
O Porter
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.45
1 player
O Porter
2 player
Z Cooke
Negative Correlation
0.11
1 player
O Porter
2 player
A Genford
No Correlation
0
1 player
O Porter
2 player
A Mushangwe
No Correlation
-0.35
1 player
O Porter
2 player
G Lyons
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
O Porter
2 player
A Wikman
Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
G Dignam
Weak Negative Correlation
0.12
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
H Ferling
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
C Leeson
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
O Porter
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
Z Cooke
Strong Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
A Genford
Positive Correlation
0.23
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
A Mushangwe
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
G Lyons
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
Z Cooke
2 player
A Wikman
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Genford
2 player
G Dignam
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
A Genford
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
-0.29
1 player
A Genford
2 player
H Ferling
Weak Negative Correlation
0
1 player
A Genford
2 player
C Leeson
No Correlation
0.11
1 player
A Genford
2 player
O Porter
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
A Genford
2 player
Z Cooke
Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Genford
2 player
A Genford
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Genford
2 player
A Mushangwe
No Correlation
-0.43
1 player
A Genford
2 player
G Lyons
Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
A Genford
2 player
A Wikman
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
G Dignam
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.23
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
K Mack
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
H Ferling
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
C Leeson
No Correlation
0
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
O Porter
No Correlation
0.23
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
Z Cooke
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
A Genford
No Correlation
1
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
A Mushangwe
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
G Lyons
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Mushangwe
2 player
A Wikman
Negative Correlation
-0.5
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
G Dignam
Negative Correlation
0.09
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
0
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
H Ferling
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
C Leeson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
O Porter
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
Z Cooke
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
A Genford
Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
A Mushangwe
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
G Lyons
Strong Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
G Lyons
2 player
A Wikman
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
G Dignam
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
K Mack
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
H Ferling
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.29
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
C Leeson
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.43
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
O Porter
Negative Correlation
-0.35
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
Z Cooke
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
A Genford
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.7
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
A Mushangwe
Negative Correlation
0.27
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
G Lyons
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
A Wikman
2 player
A Wikman
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

Pick Z Cooke and A Genford together
Positive Correlation

Pick G Dignam and O Porter together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Mushangwe and G Lyons together
Negative Correlation

Pick A Mushangwe and A Wikman together
Negative Correlation

High Performing Players

1 C Leeson

AR
Similar Perfomance
H Ferling 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
G Lyons -0.33
A Wikman -0.29
O Porter -0.22
K Mack -0.07
Z Cooke -0.07

2 K Mack

BAT
Similar Perfomance
G Dignam 0.56
Z Cooke 0.12
G Lyons 0.09
Opposite Perfomance
H Ferling -0.36
A Mushangwe -0.23
O Porter -0.16
A Genford -0.14
A Wikman -0.12
C Leeson -0.07

3 Z Cooke

BOW
Similar Perfomance
A Genford 0.7
A Mushangwe 0.23
K Mack 0.12
H Ferling 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
O Porter -0.45
A Wikman -0.35
G Dignam -0.23
G Lyons -0.23
C Leeson -0.07

4 H Ferling

BOW
Similar Perfomance
O Porter 0.27
A Mushangwe 0.23
A Wikman 0.2
Z Cooke 0.11
C Leeson 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
K Mack -0.36
A Genford -0.29
G Dignam -0.11

5 O Porter

BAT
Similar Perfomance
H Ferling 0.27
A Genford 0.11
Opposite Perfomance
G Dignam -0.7
Z Cooke -0.45
A Wikman -0.43
G Lyons -0.35
C Leeson -0.22
K Mack -0.16

Best QUN-W Player Combinations

Best QUN-W Player Combinations

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad

High Performing Players

  • Show result for
  • Played Last Match
  • Full Squad
L Winfield-Hill WK QUN-W
L Hamilton BOW QUN-W
S Ginger AR QUN-W
M Wrigley WK QUN-W
G Redmayne WK QUN-W
N Hancock BOW QUN-W
G Harris AR QUN-W
C Sippel BOW QUN-W
C Knott AR QUN-W
L Harris BAT QUN-W
J Jonassen AR QUN-W
L Winfield-Hill
L Hamilton
S Ginger
M Wrigley
G Redmayne
N Hancock
G Harris
C Sippel
C Knott
L Harris
J Jonassen
1
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
L Hamilton
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.2
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
S Ginger
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
M Wrigley
No Correlation
-0.27
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.09
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
-0.23
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
G Harris
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
C Sippel
Weak Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
L Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Winfield-Hill
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Negative Correlation
1
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
L Hamilton
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
S Ginger
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
M Wrigley
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.56
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
N Hancock
Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
G Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
C Sippel
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Hamilton
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.2
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
0
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
1
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
S Ginger
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
M Wrigley
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
C Sippel
Negative Correlation
-0.12
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
L Harris
Weak Negative Correlation
0.25
1 player
S Ginger
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
S Ginger
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
M Wrigley
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
G Harris
Positive Correlation
0.7
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
C Sippel
Positive Correlation
-0.42
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
C Knott
Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
L Harris
Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
M Wrigley
2 player
J Jonassen
Negative Correlation
-0.27
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
L Hamilton
Weak Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
S Ginger
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
M Wrigley
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
G Redmayne
Strong Positive Correlation
0.05
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
G Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
C Sippel
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.22
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
C Knott
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.41
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
L Harris
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
G Redmayne
2 player
J Jonassen
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
No Correlation
-0.56
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
L Hamilton
Negative Correlation
0
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
S Ginger
No Correlation
0.14
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
M Wrigley
No Correlation
0.05
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
1
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
N Hancock
Strong Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
-0.18
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
C Sippel
No Correlation
-0.07
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
-0.25
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
L Harris
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.33
1 player
N Hancock
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.23
1 player
G Harris
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Negative Correlation
0.23
1 player
G Harris
2 player
L Hamilton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Harris
2 player
S Ginger
No Correlation
0.7
1 player
G Harris
2 player
M Wrigley
Positive Correlation
0.2
1 player
G Harris
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Positive Correlation
0.11
1 player
G Harris
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
1
1 player
G Harris
2 player
G Harris
Strong Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
G Harris
2 player
C Sippel
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.09
1 player
G Harris
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
-0.14
1 player
G Harris
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
0.42
1 player
G Harris
2 player
J Jonassen
Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
-0.45
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
S Ginger
Negative Correlation
0.7
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
M Wrigley
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.18
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
G Harris
Weak Positive Correlation
1
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
C Sippel
Strong Positive Correlation
0
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
0.4
1 player
C Sippel
2 player
J Jonassen
Positive Correlation
0.27
1 player
C Knott
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
C Knott
2 player
L Hamilton
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.12
1 player
C Knott
2 player
S Ginger
No Correlation
-0.42
1 player
C Knott
2 player
M Wrigley
Negative Correlation
-0.22
1 player
C Knott
2 player
G Redmayne
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.07
1 player
C Knott
2 player
N Hancock
No Correlation
-0.09
1 player
C Knott
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
0
1 player
C Knott
2 player
C Sippel
No Correlation
1
1 player
C Knott
2 player
C Knott
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.08
1 player
C Knott
2 player
L Harris
No Correlation
0.29
1 player
C Knott
2 player
J Jonassen
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
L Harris
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.14
1 player
L Harris
2 player
L Hamilton
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
L Harris
2 player
S Ginger
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
L Harris
2 player
M Wrigley
Positive Correlation
-0.41
1 player
L Harris
2 player
G Redmayne
Negative Correlation
-0.25
1 player
L Harris
2 player
N Hancock
Weak Negative Correlation
-0.14
1 player
L Harris
2 player
G Harris
No Correlation
-0.11
1 player
L Harris
2 player
C Sippel
No Correlation
-0.08
1 player
L Harris
2 player
C Knott
No Correlation
1
1 player
L Harris
2 player
L Harris
Strong Positive Correlation
-0.45
1 player
L Harris
2 player
J Jonassen
Negative Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
L Winfield-Hill
Weak Positive Correlation
0.33
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
L Hamilton
Weak Positive Correlation
0.25
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
S Ginger
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.7
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
M Wrigley
Negative Correlation
0.14
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
G Redmayne
No Correlation
-0.33
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
N Hancock
Weak Negative Correlation
0.42
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
G Harris
Positive Correlation
0.4
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
C Sippel
Positive Correlation
0.29
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
C Knott
Weak Positive Correlation
-0.45
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
L Harris
Negative Correlation
1
1 player
J Jonassen
2 player
J Jonassen
Strong Positive Correlation
Strong Positive Correlation
No Correlation
Strong Negative Correlation

No data found

High Performing Players

1 C Knott

AR
Similar Perfomance
L Hamilton 0.33
J Jonassen 0.29
L Winfield-Hill 0.27
Opposite Perfomance
M Wrigley -0.42
G Redmayne -0.22
S Ginger -0.12
G Harris -0.09
L Harris -0.08
N Hancock -0.07

2 C Sippel

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Wrigley 0.7
J Jonassen 0.4
L Winfield-Hill 0.33
G Harris 0.33
G Redmayne 0.29
Opposite Perfomance
S Ginger -0.45
N Hancock -0.18
L Harris -0.11

3 J Jonassen

AR
Similar Perfomance
G Harris 0.42
C Sippel 0.4
L Winfield-Hill 0.33
L Hamilton 0.33
C Knott 0.29
S Ginger 0.25
G Redmayne 0.14
Opposite Perfomance
M Wrigley -0.7
L Harris -0.45
N Hancock -0.33

4 N Hancock

BOW
Similar Perfomance
M Wrigley 0.14
G Harris 0.11
G Redmayne 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
L Hamilton -0.56
J Jonassen -0.33
L Harris -0.25
C Sippel -0.18
L Winfield-Hill -0.09
C Knott -0.07

5 G Redmayne

WK
Similar Perfomance
S Ginger 0.33
C Sippel 0.29
G Harris 0.2
J Jonassen 0.14
N Hancock 0.05
Opposite Perfomance
L Harris -0.41
L Hamilton -0.33
L Winfield-Hill -0.27
C Knott -0.22
M Wrigley -0.14

More on PL Labs

AM-W vs QUN-W

PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved

Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.

Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.

This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only