365/10
50 Overs
231/10
40.1 Overs
English Domestic One Day Cup, MID vs NOT Scorecard, Dream11 Team Analysis: Get the full details for the completed match between Middlesex and Nottinghamshire Scorecards, Dream11 team analysis with actual fantasy points earned, top fantasy performers and comparison of 1st and 2nd innings for the match MID vs NOT
If it is a more batsmen-friendly pitch, pick more batsmen and batting all-rounders in your lineup
If it is a more bowler-friendly pitch, pick more bowlers and bowling all-rounders in your lineup
Similarly, if the Pitch is Pace-friendly, then it means that the pitch is favoring pacers more, so you have to pick more pacers over spinners in your lineup
If the Pitch is Spin-friendly, then it means that pitch is favoring spinners more, so you have to pick more spinners over pacers in your lineup
Get the latest prediction for the upcoming match between MID and NOT. Check the full details and the schedule and also the name of a player who will be going to play in the match MID vs NOT in the sections below
Showing the playing 11 of the Middlesex
team for the match MID vs NOT
Showing the playing 11 of the Nottinghamshire
team for the match MID vs NOT
Get the full analysis of the dream team for the completed match, with the actual fantasy points scored by the players in the match
Here is the list of the top fantasy players for the last matches
Check out the latest scorecard for the exciting match between the Middlesex and the Nottinghamshire in the sections below
BATSMAN | R | B | 4S | 6S | SR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mark Stoneman b BA Hutton |
35 | 27 | 5 | 1 | 129.63 |
Joe Benjamin Cracknell c D Schadendorf b LA Patterson-White |
35 | 41 | 4 | 1 | 85.37 |
Sam Robson b BA Hutton |
17 | 16 | 2 | 1 | 106.25 |
Jack Davies c Calvin Harrison b TW Loten |
19 | 32 | 0 | 1 | 59.38 |
Ryan Higgins c H Hameed b LW James |
88 | 58 | 10 | 3 | 151.72 |
Martin Andersson c Calvin Harrison b LW James |
100 | 81 | 10 | 2 | 123.46 |
John Simpson c Benjamin Martindale b TW Loten |
0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 |
Luke Hollman c LA Patterson-White b Dane Paterson |
35 | 34 | 2 | 0 | 102.94 |
Joshua De Caires c LA Patterson-White b LW James |
2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 66.67 |
Ethan Bamber runout (D Schadendorf / M Montgomery) |
5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 |
Ishaan Kaushal Not out |
1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 |
BOWLER | 0 | M | R | W | ER |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brett Hutton | 8.0 | 1 | 35 | 2 | 4.38 |
Dane Paterson | 9.0 | 0 | 77 | 1 | 8.56 |
Lyndon James | 10.0 | 0 | 82 | 3 | 8.20 |
Liam Patterson-White | 10.0 | 0 | 57 | 1 | 5.70 |
Tom Loten | 8.0 | 0 | 61 | 2 | 7.63 |
Calvin Harrison | 5.0 | 0 | 47 | 0 | 9.40 |
BATSMAN | R | B | 4S | 6S | SR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ben Slater c JA Simpson b ER Bamber |
25 | 30 | 3 | 0 | 83.33 |
Benjamin Martindale c J Davies b ER Bamber |
11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 122.22 |
Lyndon James c MD Stoneman b I Kaushal |
7 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 43.75 |
Haseeb Hameed b ER Bamber |
15 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 115.38 |
Matthew Montgomery c JD Caires b Ryan Higgins |
40 | 45 | 4 | 0 | 88.89 |
Liam Patterson-White c J Davies b Ryan Higgins |
8 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 47.06 |
Dane Schadendorf c JA Simpson b Ryan Higgins |
19 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 146.15 |
Calvin Harrison c Joe Cracknell b SD Robson |
41 | 51 | 4 | 0 | 80.39 |
Tom Loten c JA Simpson b SD Robson |
44 | 40 | 4 | 2 | 110.00 |
Brett Hutton c MK Andersson b LBK Hollman |
10 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 200.00 |
Dane Paterson Not out |
7 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 350.00 |
BOWLER | 0 | M | R | W | ER |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ishaan Kaushal | 8.0 | 0 | 45 | 1 | 5.63 |
Ethan Bamber | 7.0 | 1 | 32 | 3 | 4.57 |
Ryan Higgins | 10.0 | 1 | 40 | 3 | 4.00 |
Martin Andersson | 3.0 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 8.67 |
Luke Hollman | 5.0 | 0 | 41 | 1 | 8.20 |
Sam Robson | 4.1 | 0 | 23 | 2 | 5.52 |
Joshua De Caires | 3.0 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 7.67 |
Innings-wise Comparison of the performance of both the teams on the basis of score, 4s, 6s, wicket lost, fantasy points and much more
PerfectLineup © 2024. All Rights Reserved
Disclaimer - PerfectLineup is an educational tool providing detailed analysis of sports players based on their past performances. We are not associated with any gaming activity and do not host any kind of paid or free contests or pool games. Our focus is purely on data-driven solutions to enhance our users' knowledge.
Perfect Lineup is not affiliated in any way to and claims no association, in any capacity whatsoever, with the Residents of the states of SIKKIM, ASSAM, ODISHA, TELANGANA, NAGALAND, ANDHRA PRADESH and where otherwise prohibited by law are not eligible to access Perfect Lineup.
This platform is applicable for users 18+ Only